Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tony_FLADEM

(3,023 posts)
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 10:55 PM Sep 2012

The National Lampoon Theory of Obama's Second Term

Everybody seems to be buzzing about this Ramesh Ponnuru column today in which he argues that if Obama is reelected, the congressional GOP, far from letting up as the Potus has suggested ("the fever will break," or some such), will contrive to become even more unhinged.

Ramesh is a smart fellow and all, but I don't see why this idea is worthy of attention. It's obvious and has been obvious for weeks, months. Years. Just because Obama expresses a wish pretty clearly doesn't make it so. The GOP will double down against him, no secret there.

Ponnuru, between the lines, intends this as a kind of warning shot--i.e., if this country reelects Obama, it's just asking for dysfunction, so better to elect Romney so the government can work again. This is a GOP tactic first identified and named by Al Franken, back when he was an author. I forget exactly what he called it, but it was 2000, and he described it as roughly governing by hostage.

That is: You want unity and a decrease in polarization? Okay. Elect us. If you don't, polarization continues apace and in fact increases.



http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/04/the-national-lampoon-theory-of-obama-s-second-term.html

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The National Lampoon Theory of Obama's Second Term (Original Post) Tony_FLADEM Sep 2012 OP
the republican argument is that they may not be better drivers, but they sure suck as passengers. unblock Sep 2012 #1

unblock

(52,331 posts)
1. the republican argument is that they may not be better drivers, but they sure suck as passengers.
Tue Sep 4, 2012, 11:01 PM
Sep 2012

as passengers they always try to grab the steering wheel and poke the driver and so on. so the argument is, better to let them driver because democrats are better passengers.

scorched earth negotiation at its finest.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The National Lampoon Theo...