General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums***IMPEACHMENT INQUIRY HEARING NOV 21 THREAD 2***
Thread #1 here - https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212713690
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,328 posts)hibbing
(10,097 posts)Uh oh, and an elitist Harvard graduate too.
Peace
hibbing
(10,097 posts)Pachamama
(16,887 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)(how can we tell? )
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)califootman
(120 posts)I could listen to that voice all day.
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)She said she has a "working class accent" so within England that often limits her ability to move up... but she didn't have that issue here in the U.S.
Meaning to we in the U.S., she has a "British accent" and no matter the dialect (that Americans aren't cognizant of) - it's "Anglo-Saxon" (in quotes ).
I can even hear some Scottish brogue in there too (I used to work with a science advisor who was a Scot).
polichick
(37,152 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 21, 2019, 11:54 AM - Edit history (1)
Mersky
(4,980 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)Mersky
(4,980 posts)Shrike47
(6,913 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)EarlG
(21,947 posts)She still has her Geordie accent
Roland99
(53,342 posts)Nicholas FandosCongressional Correspondent
It is kind of amazing how many immigrants or children of immigrants this impeachment inquiry has heard from: Hill. Yovanovitch. Vindman. Sondland.
crickets
(25,963 posts)Pachamama
(16,887 posts)Her family was poor and coal miners who came to the US to work in WV coal mines...
Mike 03
(16,616 posts)and won't be intimidated by anyone. Almost like testifying here today is trivial compared to what she's experienced.
H2O Man
(73,536 posts)She is outstanding.
H2O Man
(73,536 posts)I could listen to Dr. Fiona Hill forever.
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)Seriously - it is such a great voice I want to add it to the voice of Matthew McConaughy for my Calm app... I mean this in a completely serious and positive way...
H2O Man
(73,536 posts)Chairman Schiff just said the republicans are uncomfortable with what she is saying!
Pachamama
(16,887 posts)Gee...could it be because she is telling them they are defending the Russians?
And that she is an expert who is credible?
And strong and smart....
H2O Man
(73,536 posts)to see if the usual shit-splatters on the republican side try to challenge her.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)I'm totally picturing Madeleine's voice from Last of the Mohicans when Nathaniel is trying to get Colonel Munro to let the men leave to protect their homes and she comes in to his defense.
Bayard
(22,061 posts)H2O Man
(73,536 posts)I think that was her most outstanding movie. Loved it. (I was at Onondaga when they were seeking "extras" for the movie, another reason I love it to this day. And, of course, I always admired Russell Means.)
Roland99
(53,342 posts)Yeah. Its a fave of mine
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,328 posts)If you missed them, Thursday TOONs are a quick way to get an outline of how we got here.
demmiblue
(36,841 posts)Hill: "Our nation is being torn apart. Truth is questioned. Our highly professional and expert career foreign service is being undermined."
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,328 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)crickets
(25,963 posts)Mersky
(4,980 posts)Pachamama
(16,887 posts)Thanks for posting!
Mersky
(4,980 posts)And you're very welcome! Am so glad to, really.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)carry Fiona Hill's sweat..the saying Russians are coming...the republicans and this admin, the Russians are here....
Fiona Hill..will NOT put up with their Russian propaganda...she takes my breathe away with her story..
Why does the movie "How Green Was My Valley" come to mind..
Arkansas Granny
(31,515 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)to point the blame away from themselves.
Miles Archer
(18,837 posts)Quick...someone check Nunes' shorts for damage.
Ms. Hill is ripping the whole "the Russians didn't do it" narrative to shreds. and Schiff is backing her up, and now asking her about Russia blaming it on Ukraine...Hill responds "WELL, THAT IS ABSOLUTELY THE CASE."
Happy Hoosier
(7,294 posts)... is gonna have their ass handed to them.
demmiblue
(36,841 posts)SKKY
(11,804 posts)Super, super smart, and very well spoken.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)"Do as we say not what we do" - regarding Drumpf telling Ukraine to investigate "corruption" yet the U.S. wants Ukraine to investigate the U.S. President's rival.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,328 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)because he referenced his "colleagues" having suddenly discovered that term.
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)Ninga
(8,275 posts)madaboutharry
(40,209 posts)I am looking forward to what happens when some of these republicans ask her bullshit questions.
crickets
(25,963 posts)Hill is sharp - neither Castor nor any of the Repubs are going to get any nonsense past her.
Nailed it!
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)that Zelensky had apparently been quoted as mentioning and Holmes confirmed that it apparently had to do with the Burisma/Biden issue.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)The Democrats lawyer, Daniel S. Goldman, joined the House Intelligence Committee earlier this year, bringing expertise in prosecuting criminals and mobsters as a former assistant United States attorney in New York. Mr. Goldman, a 43-year-old father of five, is also well-versed in talking about investigations into President Trump as a paid legal expert on MSNBC. Republicans who have spent dozens of hours with Mr. Goldman sequestered in the Intelligence Committees basement offices conceded they had come to have a grudging respect for his work.
Mr. Goldman has been open about his low opinion of Mr. Trump. In a Twitter post last December, Mr. Goldman compared Mr. Trump to mob bosses he had prosecuted, saying Mob bosses are far smarter and way more savvy and discrete than Trump.
That same month, he wrote that the president, doesnt care about the country, just himself. Shameful. He used the hashtag #TrumpResign and LOL-ed in response to one of Mr. Trumps many Witch Hunt! tweets.
...
In questioning key witnesses in private depositions and in public, Mr. Goldman brings the staccato cadence of a seasoned prosecutor, often asking witnesses questions that would elicit yes or no responses. His years in the high profile United States attorneys office in the Southern District of New York and his time on MSNBC prepared him for the spotlight of the televised impeachment proceedings.
crickets
(25,963 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)and Holmes had asked Sondland what that meant - and the response was the "Biden" thing.
crickets
(25,963 posts)asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)to share an appetizer..magnificent..I'm in awe...
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)hibbing
(10,097 posts)catbyte
(34,374 posts)onecaliberal
(32,828 posts)Mersky
(4,980 posts)Is what Sondland replied when Holmes asked him to clarify 'big stuff'.
avebury
(10,952 posts)totally amazing. I totally hope that the Rethugs are stupid enough to go after her so that we can watch her totally smack them down.
Is there a state we can get her to move to so she can run for US Senate?
earthside
(6,960 posts)These two witnesses are absolutely the most perfect to wrap-up the last two weeks of testimony.
Holmes and Hill are presenting a great summary.
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)and whether she had ever heard anything like what has been described.
And she was about to invoke Executive Privilege and her lawyer had an exchange with Goldman about narrowing the answer to the "unclassified" part of what happened with this particular call.
hlthe2b
(102,228 posts)I hope all who can, ARE watching/listening.
mucifer
(23,533 posts)people may be watching it later on youtube people do have to work.
Roland99
(53,342 posts)ABC/NBC/CBS generally draw 6-9 million viewers each for their evening news programs (lowest rated still millions more than Faux has on cable)
mucifer
(23,533 posts)It's not yesterday's ratings. I don't think we have that yet
Roland99
(53,342 posts)guess cable choices are more prevalent 9-5
The_Counsel
(1,660 posts)...when he said that the ratings are/were in the crapper???
Surprise!
...
...
...okay, not really.
jayfish
(10,039 posts)This also doesn't take into account live streaming and radio listeners.
Mike 03
(16,616 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,328 posts)hlthe2b
(102,228 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)(former President) and Holmes felt that he was engaging in corruption.
crickets
(25,963 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)crickets
(25,963 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)blaze
(6,359 posts)They'll ask Hill questions they know are protected by executive privilege, so she can't answer anything.
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)mucifer
(23,533 posts)Lots to choose from and I don't have cable tv
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)and decided to wait it out.
Thankfully all this stuff is archived so I can always go back to it (back in the day I would have been taping all of this ).
Mersky
(4,980 posts)Thats just not cool. Would think theyd delay that. Sheesh.
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)But now was not the time.
jayfish
(10,039 posts)They need to dedicate 15 minutes worth of questioning to dismantle this crap. What good does it do to simply say "it has no basis in fact" when Nunenuts and his cadre just bring it up as a real thing 15 minutes later. It must be burned to the ground.
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)and she confirmed that it was because Ghoul was on TV all the time making all kinds of incendiary and explosive comments.
riversedge
(70,195 posts)31 min ago
Fiona Hill: Ukraine election meddling is a "fictional narrative" told by Russia
https://www.cnn.com/politics/live-news/impeachment-hearing-11-21-19/index.html
Former White House Russia expert Fiona Hill will tell the House Intelligence Committee that the idea that Ukraine meddled in the 2016 US presidential election is a "fictional narrative that has been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services."
Here's what she will say, according to a copy of her prepared remarks:
"Based on questions and statements I have heard, some of you on this committee appear to believe that Russia and its security services did not conduct a campaign against our country and that perhaps, somehow, for some reason, Ukraine did," she will say.
Hill will continue:
""This is a fictional narrative that has been perpetrated and propagated by the Russian security services themselves."
"
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,328 posts)OAITW r.2.0
(24,455 posts)Hill categorically denied that there was any evidence of Crowdstrike/Biden corruption in the Ukraine. Holmes says this is a tactic that strongly implicates Russian, and gives the reason's why this Republican talking points(s) benefit Russia.
Who you gonna believe? Trump/Nunes/Jordan.....or Hill and Holmes? No contest.
I wonder if Putin put the gameplan in play at the Helsinki secret meeting?
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)And confirmed that Ghouliani repeatedly that "Burisma" meant the "Bidens".
hlthe2b
(102,228 posts)crickets
(25,963 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)WASHINGTON Kashyap Patel is a lawyer who has sometimes run afoul of the rules.
As a lawyer in Florida, Mr. Patel, 37, entered and then dropped out of a charity bachelor auction featuring some colleagues after a blogger pointed out that his license to practice in the state appeared out of date. In 2016, as a counterterrorism prosecutor for the Justice Department, he was berated by a federal judge who then issued an Order on Ineptitude directed at the entire agency. And over the summer, in a trip arranged outside official channels, he traveled to London, where he tried unsuccessfully to meet with Christopher Steele, the author of the dossier that purported to details links between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to multiple people with knowledge of the trip.
After less than a year as a Republican staff member on the House Intelligence Committee, Mr. Patel has found himself in the middle of another controversy. According to congressional sources, he is the primary author of the politically charged memo, released on Friday by the committee chairman, Representative Devin Nunes, over the opposition of the F.B.I. and the intelligence community, that accuses federal officials of bias against President Trump.
Democrats, led by Representative Adam B. Schiff, the ranking minority member on the committee, were scathing in their criticism of both the report and the decision to release it to the public.
...
Over the summer, Mr. Nunes dispatched Mr. Patel and another member of the committees Republican staff to London, where they showed up unannounced at the offices of Mr. Steele, a former British intelligence official.
Told Mr. Steele was not there, Mr. Patel and Douglas E. Presley, a professional staff member, managed to track him down at the offices of his lawyers. There, they said they were seeking only to establish contact with Mr. Steele, but were rebuffed and left without meeting him, according to two people with knowledge of the encounter.
crickets
(25,963 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)herding cats
(19,564 posts)I heard his name and ran in to rewind and soak it all in. It will definitely be a fire under Nunes that they went there.
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)re: Energy sector and other reforms and then talks about how the Ukrainians started asking about the "meeting" with the President. She noted that Bolton pushed back and tried to change the subject.... And then Sondland butted in and declared that a "meeting" would occur - which caused Bolton to stiffen.
Sondland then told her that this had been discussed with Mulvaney.
crickets
(25,963 posts)Did they really think no one, none of the professional around them, would figure out their game and push back? Mind boggles every time the story is told.
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)What we are seeing out is how "business people" operate.
THEY "make the rules". The federal government does NOT operate that way and so here we are with the "clash of culture" - "business vs government".
Roland99
(53,342 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)crickets
(25,963 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)and told her to go to the lawyers (Eisenberg) and to tell the lawyers that Bolton didn't want to be a part of that "drug deal".
BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)BumRushDaShow
(128,874 posts)Mersky
(4,980 posts)So any claims that he doesn't know xzy, or pulls any stunts involving ignorance of Hill's testimony, he'll have to explain what the heck he was doing there.
asiliveandbreathe
(8,203 posts)I wonder if there are enough red taxis in DC as ALL the admin must be haling at this time...
joost5
(421 posts)Link to tweet
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1197298747136450560&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.dailykos.com%2Fstory%2F2019%2F11%2F20%2F1900872%2F-Check-out-this-unintentionally-hilarious-Donald-Trump-tweet
Mersky
(4,980 posts)There should be no contest whatsoever.