Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Jarqui

(10,421 posts) Sat Nov 23, 2019, 02:50 AM Nov 2019

Judge Napolitano: Enough Evidence 'to Justify About Three or Four Articles of Impeachment

Another Conservative media member conceding on the articles of impeachment

Napolitano has been going this way for some time.

He still doesn't think Trump will be removed.

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Judge Napolitano: Enough Evidence 'to Justify About Three or Four Articles of Impeachment (Original Post) Jarqui Nov 2019 OP

He documents 6 articles of impeachment grantcart Nov 2019 #1

And he's right about trump not being removed. joshdawg Nov 2019 #2

Probably right but there are still some unknown landmines ahead grantcart Nov 2019 #4

Good info! kentuck Nov 2019 #3

grantcart

(53,061 posts)

1. He documents 6 articles of impeachment

Reply to Jarqui (Original post)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 05:16 AM

Nov 2019

joshdawg

(2,705 posts)

2. And he's right about trump not being removed.

Reply to grantcart (Reply #1)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 05:49 AM

Nov 2019

All 53 republican Senators will vote to keep him in office.
Impeachment will be the same..........no republican rep will vote to impeach.

JMHO.

grantcart

(53,061 posts)

4. Probably right but there are still some unknown landmines ahead

Reply to joshdawg (Reply #2)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 12:14 PM

Nov 2019

They ate still working in the tax returns which could detail criminal activity

NY State could indict on insurance fraud etc.

kentuck

(112,539 posts)

3. Good info!

Reply to Jarqui (Original post)

Sat Nov 23, 2019, 07:27 AM

Nov 2019

from the other side.

Reply to this discussion