General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)So have been trying to keep the threads at not too much over 100 posts each.
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)I missed the first half hour and was able to get the missed highlights by reading the first thread.
I'm not on dialup, but it feels like it sometimes. It takes several seconds for the OP to display as my slow carrier looks up youtube, etc.
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)Years ago when I was on dialup and then DSL (before I got Comcast digital) it was a nuisance!!!!
SummerSnow
(12,608 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)Towlie
(5,577 posts)"Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, I have one final thing I want you to consider. Ladies and gentlemen, this is Chewbacca. Chewbacca is a Wookiee from the planet Kashyyyk. But Chewbacca lives on the planet Endor. Now think about it; that does not make sense! Why would a Wookiee, an 8-foot-tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of 2-foot-tall Ewoks? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense!"
underpants
(196,495 posts)louis-t
(24,618 posts)Gidney N Cloyd
(19,847 posts)nolabear
(43,850 posts)Is there a required adjournment time? Could he just say We have to get through this. Bring supplies.
crickets
(26,168 posts)heads off some of the senseless parliamentary inquiries right away.
Again.
ancianita
(43,307 posts)Most excellent Chairman Nadler!
crickets
(26,168 posts)CapnSteve
(405 posts)I hope they get his position on Pres. Clinton's impeachment (he was for it and removal). And now he is against. Hmm...
napi21
(45,806 posts)professor of law, and very common sense man. My jaw dropped when I heard him saying how wrong the Dems were to do this impeachment. I hope to hear from him again to understand his rational.
RainCaster
(13,717 posts)So we will get to hear his musings.
backtoblue
(13,197 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(179,005 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)He took no shit from Jonathan Turley!
greatauntoftriplets
(179,005 posts)yet he has a way of getting to the heart of things quickly. Great mind.
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)crickets
(26,168 posts)They're getting right to the point of what Trump has done and why these acts are impeachable.
C_U_L8R
(49,384 posts)He may as well take a stroll around the block... maybe he can go read the Constitution.
The_Counsel
(1,757 posts)The Dems have no real use for Turley other than as a whipping boy.
No need to come off as complete bullies. At least not right away anyway...
underpants
(196,495 posts)backtoblue
(13,197 posts)They showed a clip of Bill Taylor's testimony and it seems like so long ago....these patriots will be quoted and studied far into our future histories.
(Also, I was smoking a J when the screen went to Taylor. Took me a second to figure out he wasnt back lol)
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)backtoblue
(13,197 posts)tazkcmo
(7,419 posts)I just got home from work and I'm catching up reading the threads. I too need to Mary Jane! BTW, thank you for doing this.
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)backtoblue
(13,197 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)crickets
(26,168 posts)Turley treated it as amusing. It's appalling he didn't seem to have the decency to be embarrassed.
Arthur_Frain
(2,358 posts)Im betting that a further point could have been made by pointing out that everything he was about to add had no bearing on the actual impeachment hearings.
This is like Christmas for me today, i didnt even know this was going to be televised! I absolutely love how the democrats seem to have decided to treat the republicans accordingly, and conduct the entire proceedings as if it were under the banner of the XXXX for Idiots guides.
ancianita
(43,307 posts)Auggie
(33,150 posts)ancianita
(43,307 posts)crickets
(26,168 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)crickets
(26,168 posts)bluestarone
(22,179 posts)She is the women of the year so far in my books!! She is super on FIRE!!!! The Rethugs would be wise to STAY AWAY from questioning her!!
Mersky
(5,340 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)At a less elevated level, I loved her calling out presumed Satan's agent Pastor Doug Collins for his attempt to slander her integrity.
Satch59
(1,354 posts)Cant imagine GOP will ask her any question... shes fantastic and heres to all the women of these hearings...superstars!
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)crickets
(26,168 posts)Last time I checked, betrayal of national security is treason. Everyone seems to dance around that word, but it is there.
blogslut
(39,167 posts)Are they going to ice out the three sane witnesses and just ask questions from Turley?
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)backtoblue
(13,197 posts)45 for only counsel or ranking member without being able to yield time to others?
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)although I hadn't been able to find anything for their rules as explicit as what the Intelligence Committee had put into place for their hearings (i.e., there wasn't an actual House resolution).
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)Nadler referenced House Resolution 660 - which is what the Intelligence Committee used (I think there was a section in there that did reference the Judiciary Committee but it was not as detailed as the Intelligence rules.
Wednesdays
(22,603 posts)Raftergirl
(1,856 posts)I think its quite typical. When my cousin (a sports economist) had to testify regarding college athletes being paid, only the Ds asked him any questions. This was a few years ago when the Rs had the majority. They had 3 witnesses on their side (one was Ken Starr who was President of Baylor at the time.) The Rs didnt ask my cousin one question.
Ninga
(9,012 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)Mersky
(5,340 posts)Hes sharp. I like his hair - mesmerizing.
luvs2sing
(2,234 posts)Love the questions and the hair!
Mersky
(5,340 posts)I think hes stunning.
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)flamingdem
(40,891 posts)luvs2sing
(2,234 posts)and why does she look so bereft?
PatSeg
(53,214 posts)It looks like she is even blinking back tears.
luvs2sing
(2,234 posts)Prof. Karlan talked about her mail order turkey.
underpants
(196,495 posts)You have to give those of us who arent watching some more info on that.
PatSeg
(53,214 posts)who looks very sad, though I can't tie it to anything Karlan is saying, as she has looked like that for some time. The blinking is rather persistent, so maybe she has a problem with her contacts, but she sure does look sad.
PatSeg
(53,214 posts)about who she is.
luvs2sing
(2,234 posts)mail order turkey for Thanksgiving because she was too busy preparing for this hearing. There is a woman sitting behind her who has been looking on the verge of tears through the whole hearing. I dont know who she is, but the turkey comment seemed to almost push her over the edge.
So that is when it appears to have started then? I wasn't watching her until I read your comment.
luvs2sing
(2,234 posts)I was trying to figure out earlier if there were tears on her face or overzealous highlighter. She has looked this way from the beginning.
PatSeg
(53,214 posts)luvs2sing
(2,234 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 4, 2019, 02:17 PM - Edit history (1)
She didnt look weepy then. So maybe connected to him.
hlthe2b
(113,971 posts)luvs2sing
(2,234 posts)One of the witnesses. Massive brain fart.
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)a crime - the attempt itself becomes its own crime.
ancianita
(43,307 posts)crickets
(26,168 posts)- as was illustrated by the charges brought against Richard Nixon. I love how Nixon has been the example several times now. Funny how Clinton's case just doesn't seem to apply to this testimony.
The_Counsel
(1,757 posts)You don't get to get away with attempting a crime just because you suck at it.
To paraphrase Andy Dufresne in "The Shawshank Redemption": Maybe Team Trump should have considered being better criminals...?
backtoblue
(13,197 posts)Showing on cspan 3 and online only
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)I know that regular CSPAN will break away if the House is in session.
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)Mersky
(5,340 posts)When Sondland described that Ukraine didnt actually have to investigate for corruption, that they only had announce such. She went on to say that this showed it wasnt about corruption, but only the appearance of pursuing dirt on a particularly hard political opponent.
Further, she said that the Constitution is indifferent about who is the next president. It only cares about the three elections. I took this to mean the Constitution doesnt exist to protect tRumps re-election.
Ill rewatch this section from ~ 11:52am ET. Is so good.
On edit: added "the appearance" as that more correctly conveys Karlan's sentiment within my rather rough paraphrasing. Thanks, Hermit-the-Prog, for catching that drop!
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)Trump didn't want any conclusions; he wanted some 'clouds and shadows' to point through for as long as needed.
Example:
In NYT's Hillary Clinton Coverage, An Obsession With 'Clouds' And 'Shadows'
Mersky
(5,340 posts)I'll edit and note my post. Thanks!
crickets
(26,168 posts)BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)Mersky
(5,340 posts)Im gonna borrow that phrase for later.
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)Mersky
(5,340 posts)Needed the recess, yes, I did.
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)Mersky
(5,340 posts)Am anticipating a few built-in breaks this afternoon. Repugs will likely just display how much theyve given up on their responsibilities.
nolabear
(43,850 posts)They have nothing on whether its impeachable, so I expect them to attack the integrity, honesty, and absence of prejudice of the witnesses.
Theyve been so measured and so patriotic.
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)and their counsel will probably do misleading questioning the other 3...
ETA - and at Collins' presser outside the hearing room, he literally just said that they were going to focus on working Turley for their side.
nolabear
(43,850 posts)crickets
(26,168 posts)the Republicans will get their soundbites, but they will not be very convincing ones.
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)crickets
(26,168 posts)I thought it was going to be dry and uninteresting, and I could not have been more pleasantly surprised. This is the most fascinating live civics lesson ever. I am so impressed at the depth of knowledge and passion present in the witnesses, Turley notwithstanding. I hope teachers are posting these hearings as assignments to their students.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)Ukrainian soldiers died during the 55 day hostage taking of aid...I mean "pause" ?
Would that be too crude?
crickets
(26,168 posts)I wouldn't either, and I wish more of a point was made that our president got many people killed by illegally withholding aid already passed by Congress.
So, no. It would not be too crude at all.
backtoblue
(13,197 posts)This may be one of the biggest learning experiences ive sat and watched.
Raftergirl
(1,856 posts)But I expect the next 45 minutes will turn into a shit show - with the Rs and Turkey having to twist themselves into pretzels.
So Im off to do my errands and Ill listen to MSNBC on Sirius in the car.
Wednesdays
(22,603 posts)Now that we're returning from recess?
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)crickets
(26,168 posts)2. He is taking his time getting around to actually addressing a witness;
3. Turley isn't getting a question for now, just an open mic.
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)Mersky
(5,340 posts)Being a transcribers nightmare
backtoblue
(13,197 posts)Announces his chair is freezing his ass...what a fake asshole
ChubbyStar
(3,191 posts)I understand it is painful if they get too cold!
Mersky
(5,340 posts)When the hearing resumes, maybe hell ask for a kleenex? Ya know, because hes allergic to facts, laws, Dems...
I kinda wished he had a chapstick habit. Constantly reapplying seems fitting somehow.
Gidney N Cloyd
(19,847 posts)PatSeg
(53,214 posts)Someone should offer him a jacket, hint, hint. Thinks he's being a maverick, but he's really just being an asshole.
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)rainy
(6,321 posts)So not as compelling as the others.
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)and he's doing a poor job of it.
crickets
(26,168 posts)he's just not a very good actor. nt
BumRushDaShow
(169,760 posts)dweller
(28,410 posts)and jazz (and yep, he does
jazz hands)
🤣
✌🏼
Mersky
(5,340 posts)With the majority counsel, because hes not here to have an exchange. The majority knows hes there to obfuscate and bamboozle up a ledge for rw media to try to stand on.
Hehhhh, dog will hunt language. Bleh. Is trying to narrow the definition of bribery down to say you cant ever accuse a president of bribery. Is logic from the same legal circles that have made it increasingly difficult to exact justice in a political environment awash in outsized influences from the wealthy and power hungry.
Oh gawd, trap door crime will be on faux news chyrons. Editing to add: this trap door language is projection.
rainy
(6,321 posts)out to vote no. Too fast, wont work bla bla bla past impeachments.....
gristy
(10,733 posts)is remarkable. I presume/hope there is a no-smoking ordinance in that room!