General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe UK election offers a valuable lesson: hardline Far Left activism can be politically fatal.
Especially when paired with credible accusations of anti-Semitism as well as being utterly divorced from the traditional base of your party, particularly outside of college-educated urban areas.
RandySF
(83,646 posts)so he tried to talk about everything else.
ArtTownsend
(439 posts)Johonny
(26,076 posts)Bexit did what it was supposed to do. Use a false narative and xenophobia to drive liberal leaning voters to vote against their best interest. This election appeased a lot of inner racism in people, but they're not going to be prepared for the real neo-liberal agenda they just put in place. Theocracy and plutocracy lay at the heart of the conservative's neo-liberal agenda. They give not a shit for the poor and middle class whose role is to obey.
leftstreet
(40,338 posts)Amishman
(5,928 posts)plus rail and some telecoms.
Plus massive spending, which was criticized as to how to pay for it (sound familiar?)
If there is a lesson to learn, it is that charisma matters (especially broad appeal) and that incrementalism is a better tactic than promising total transformation
Recursion
(56,582 posts)roamer65
(37,905 posts)Johnson is not a UK PM, hes an English one.
Northern Ireland will unite with the Irish republic, then Scotland will leave.
Driving the final stake into the barely-beating heart of the British "Empire." It's about time.
The irony is rich, very rich.
RelativelyJones
(898 posts)safeinOhio
(37,510 posts)your concern about us "far Left".
still_one
(98,883 posts)government into businesses
Baclava
(12,047 posts)tman
(1,251 posts)Last edited Fri Dec 13, 2019, 11:43 AM - Edit history (1)
Take it from someone who lives there.
Cosmocat
(15,404 posts)Unfortunately is not confined to our borders.
That somehow when whipped into a nationalist lather people in mass will readily come to believe completely immoral and corrupt fascist are more safe than those who soberly propose the common sense measures that would most benefit their best interests.
DFW
(60,100 posts)If a country is forced to choose between two completely unappealing candidates to lead them, they will go with the one already in place. The devil you know, e.g.
Labour should have had this in a cakewalk. Two things turned this around for the Tories. First, instead of offering a clear "stay" option to Johnson's "leave," they didn't distinguish themselves from the Tories on the Brexit issue, handing Johnson a get out of jail free card by letting him claim, "see? everyone wants to leave," when that is anything but clear. Second, Corbyn is SUCH an unappealing, repellent personality (at least in public), the Party ceded the media to Johnson. Johnson may act like a buffoon, but like a half-way amiable buffoon. He disguises the danger he presents (as did Trump to some extent) until it's too late.
An unappealing candidate in your top spot is what is fatal. An appealing candidate is a plus. This is how we took the White House from Bush, senior. This is also why McCain had no chance in the world. It is also why, if the Democratic Party chooses to go further left then we have before, that Warren will fare better than Sanders. However, if ANY halfway charismatic Democrat competes with Trump, especially in his current deranged state, we should win the election handily. Whether or not we win the counting afterward is, still a completely different issue--unfortunately.
delisen
(7,345 posts)Bush Sr ignored the faltering economy and was deemed out of touch.He failed to address the main issue of most voters.
Clinton campaign hammered Bush on the economy. He addressed the main issue.
Boomerproud
(9,270 posts)M/I complex and the media. He did nothing for Americans because he had no clue or interest.
jpak
(41,780 posts)Unrec