General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe GOP is literally dying off

Only one age group skews more Republican than Democratic.
And they're rapidly dying off.
We *MUST* get the young people to the polls.
Mister Ed
(6,820 posts)Johnny2X2X
(23,698 posts)The Republicans realized this a couple decades ago, and rather than change their positions to respond to voters, they decided to prevent people from voting.
mylightningtoo
(58 posts)Response to scheming daemons (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
gopiscrap
(24,551 posts)riversedge
(79,563 posts)scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)As Silent and Boomer generation voters die off.... more Gen Zs turn 18.
And the Millennials and Gen Xs get older and more likely to vote.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,936 posts)That needs to change. We got to get the younger generations to care about politics and get them to treat participation as something other than a "hobby".
not_the_one
(2,227 posts)will get, and keep the interest up among their generation.
We HAVE to get them involved, it is THEIR life and world, now. THEY need to start making the decisions.
We have tried, but seemed to have failed. But we can surely help to give them the support they need.
I am a boomer, and proud of it. We had lofty goals, but life happens, and many of us have lost the direction we were heading in. We can STILL be majorly influential, though.
I am going to do my part.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,936 posts)bluescribbler
(2,477 posts)I'm a lifelong Democrat. Many of my peers have gone to their maker.
Unfortunately, as people age, many tend to become more conservative. Once they have something tangible to protect, such as a home, an income, or a position of status, they fight to protect it. They will abandon positions and principles they once held if they feel their assets to be threatened. I hope this doesn't happen to me, or to the younger generations. Remember, when I was young, my generation fought for civil rights, fought against war, fought for women's' rights and for LGBTQ+ rights. And yet, now many of my peers have forsaken those fights.
Aristus
(71,707 posts)I just keep drifting further and further to the left as I get older.
Turning right, whether it's related to acquisition of assets or not, is likely tied to decreasing empathy as one grows more isolated from one's fellow human beings.
bluescribbler
(2,477 posts)I too have more material assets than ever before in my life. I am also childless, by choice. But I do have a 34 year old niece whom I love dearly. I also have a girlfriend who has a 6 and 4 year old grandchildren. I worry for them as they grow into the world they will inherit. That is why I am still a Democrat, (of the Kennedy, Warren stripe.
Thekaspervote
(35,815 posts)redstatebluegirl
(12,766 posts)Those are the ones who become more conservative as they age. They are terrified and the GOP feeds on people's fears.
Hermit-The-Prog
(36,631 posts)We need to take care of each other and break the propaganda machine.
luvtheGWN
(1,343 posts)It's long past time that Democrats (and Liberals in my country) should continuously hammer home - over and over and over -- being conservative is NOT what you think it is.
I watched part of The View this morning, and Meghan McCain was so very proud to state she was a conservative Conservative. I wish someone would ask her what that actually means. "I think it does not mean (anymore) what you think it does", and even her father, whose name she drops at every GD opportunity, wouldn't be today's conservative - in either country.
The stupid....it burns.
sacto95834
(393 posts)It seems those with little to nothing are angry with the world. They need somebody to blame for their lot in life and the Republican talking points fuel their anger and gives them a target.
I often wonder if they were successful in say banishing everybody of color and their lives do not change and will likely only get worse, what then?
appalachiablue
(43,882 posts)for the woes (and ignorance)-- more femnazis, urbanites, environmentalists, disloyal non patriots, etc.
DENVERPOPS
(13,003 posts)go after the fear of anyone who isn't white............
Ohiogal
(39,820 posts)But the older I get, the more liberal I get.
I have 3 twenty something sons and I want them to live in a better world than what we have now.
Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)The world changes. People, depending on their psychology, often do not.
Old conservatives are poorly adapted to change, and resist it. The more dramatic the change, the stronger their resistance to it. These are my in-laws. Once staunch blue-collar Democrats, they are now grumpy retired Trumpists wasting away their afternoons complaining about how the world was so much better when they were younger (i.e., when they understood it).
Old liberals are well adapted to change, and are more or less welcoming of it. They watch new movies. They listen to new music. They try new foods. They travel. They read. They challenge themselves. Change to these people is far less threatening. These are my parents, whose politics have remained largely unchanged for all the years I've known them.
treestar
(82,383 posts)is more engagement with older, isolated people, rather than courting the elusive young vote.
treestar
(82,383 posts)something like, you turn conservative when you have something to conserve.
Aristus
(71,707 posts)They destroy everything they get their greedy hands on...
LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)Haggis for Breakfast
(6,831 posts)our version of a republican president was Eisenhower !!!!
Aquaria
(1,076 posts)The stats people would have broken their data down into five-year segments, rather than the broader trends they tend to use. The silents may have been drowned out (yet again) from having so many boomers creeping into the 65+ demographics in 2016, the first election where enough of them crossed the threshold to make a major impact in that group.
Haggis for Breakfast
(6,831 posts)Act_of_Reparation
(9,116 posts)
Eyeball_Kid
(7,604 posts)There are fewer people who can do the nation's work.
onetexan
(13,913 posts)the young are the future, and a force to be reckoned with. Liberal young people make liberal older adults.
secondwind
(16,903 posts)dewsgirl
(14,964 posts)Eyeball_Kid
(7,604 posts)fleur-de-lisa
(14,703 posts)They know they cannot maintain power without stealing elections.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)albacore
(2,746 posts)But.
Like a brain-shot rhino....still staggering forward, and capable of great damage in its death throes.
We have to wary.
Until the twitching stops.
warrior1
(12,325 posts)greatauntoftriplets
(178,640 posts)MaryMagdaline
(7,939 posts)shame on us
DENVERPOPS
(13,003 posts)they totally own the Dept. of Justice.........THAT is the slam dunk........
I dread, as everyone else should, the morning of Nov. 4th. If we were all worried about Y2K, it won't hold a candle to what we will see on the morning after the election, esp if the Dem wins the presidency.........
It will be Katie Bar The Door.......
WASF
brush
(61,033 posts)It's as I've always said, the boomer generation has always been split down the middle, meaning that the whole generation are not trumper/repugs.
Even during the 60s-70s there were activists/protest participants v the young repugs/hard hat crowd.
And boomer numbers are still holding that blue/red dichotomy (slightly more blue) even as boomers have gotten older.
robbob
(3,740 posts)Last edited Wed Dec 18, 2019, 01:22 AM - Edit history (1)
as a rebuke to that tendency of people as they get older to criticize the upcoming generations. Theres that famous quote (that I wont bother looking up) which rails against the youth of today, who are lazy and disrespectful, etc. etc. that was supposedly written 2,000 years ago by a Greek philosopher.
So I see the whole ok, boomer not so much as a political rebuke as just a generational eye roll as us older folks when we start with the back in my day, we knew the meaning of a hard days work, we didnt sit inside playing video games and so on.
brush
(61,033 posts)Polybius
(21,531 posts)As an Xer, I did many things that are now mainstream that were frowned upon by Boomers and Silents, such as having an earring or playing video games on a nice sunny day. I try not to judge Z's, but some times I've become that out-of-touch old guy that I once hated.
MaryMagdaline
(7,939 posts)We have the science showing us that global warming is killing the future; we have the means to reverse it; we have the worldwide political structure to combat it; we choose to let the world slip away. Ok boomer is about as mild as it gets.
Thekaspervote
(35,815 posts)Repukes would defend the constitution and the rule of law, so being a card carrying member of the gop was not equal to being a nazi!!
JIMHO: Otherwise I do think the number of self described Dems among boomers would be much larger
brush
(61,033 posts)staunchly against the Russians. Now it's just the opposite.
Many are borderline traitors as they worship the Russian asset in the WH.
Mariana
(15,613 posts)That's just a fact. It will be wonderful if that doesn't happen again.
brush
(61,033 posts)It doesn't change the fact that the majority of Boomers voted for Trump in 2016. It will be wonderful if that doesn't happen again.
brush
(61,033 posts)millennials.
Aquaria
(1,076 posts)Pew:

From this article: https://www.people-press.org/2018/08/09/an-examination-of-the-2016-electorate-based-on-validated-voters/
CNN/Roper:
18-29 Clinton: 55%, Traitor: 36%
30-44 Clinton: 51%, Traitor: 41%
45-64 Clinton: 44%, Traitor: 52%
65 & over Clinton: 45%, Traitor: 52%
https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/how-groups-voted-2016
BBC/Edison:

https://www.bbc.com/news/election-us-2016-37922587
Do you need more examples? I can provide them.
brush
(61,033 posts)Polybius
(21,531 posts)It's pretty easy to figure it out, if you know when each Generation started and ended.
brush
(61,033 posts)not all Democrats or repugs.
So you don't really know how many Dems or repugs voted for trump, or GenXers either for that matter, whose percentages are close to boomers.
Polybius
(21,531 posts)It would have been nice if it just said "Boomer" or "Silents" but at least it had "50-64" and "65+" categories, so we know how those two groups voted.
I didn't miscalculate anything. You asked for proof that the majority of Boomers voted for Trump. You got it, and it's clear as day.
brush
(61,033 posts)grouped with the the silent generation who voted heavily for trump.
You need more accurate research as you've proved nothing.
Polybius
(21,531 posts)The other poster did. You should be grateful to him/her for it, because it at least gave you most of what you asked for. It was petty helpful. No reason to get nasty, were all Democrats here.
brush
(61,033 posts)Last edited Thu Dec 19, 2019, 07:15 PM - Edit history (1)
the majority of boomers voted for trump when it's as I've said all along, a generation split down the middle since the 60s-70s between activists/protest participants v young repugs/the hardhat crowd.
It remains so. Many of the most prominent posters here on this very progressive, Democratic site are Democratic boomers still adhering to their progressive stances from before and resent being characterized as trump voters.
Polybius
(21,531 posts)The other poster said that. It was actually a surprise to me, because I thought that Boomers were more liberal on average.
Mariana
(15,613 posts)That's ridiculous. The majority of Boomers voted for Trump. Saying that doesn't "disparage" anyone except the Boomers who voted for Trump. It's really weird that this offends you so much, because it says exactly nothing bad about Boomers who voted for Clinton.
brush
(61,033 posts)Aquaria
(1,076 posts)The statisticians dont break it down by your particular standards, so you throw a tantrum rather than doing a small bit of thinking?
Whats wrong with you?
In 2016, 13 of the 20 years of the 45-64 age group were Boomers. They are also the vast majority of that age group segment, since the biggest birth number years of all time happened in the mid- to late-50s. Those people would have been in their late 50s and early 60s in 2016.
Seven years of the 65+ age group were also both Boomers and the vast majority of that age group as well, for two reasons: 1) The sheer numbers of them born in 1945-1951 in comparison to previous years, and then 2) the dramatic drops that happen in the population at every five year point after age 65, because, you know, old age kills more people than anything else.
You can also figure out that gen Xers were part of the 45-64 age group (about 7 years of it), but almost the entirety of the 30-44 group (around 13 of its 15-year span), while millennials would have taken up all of the 18-30, and only 2 years of the 30-44.
Comprehending the breakdown by your arbitrary standard would have taken only some basic arithmetic and a nominal bit of flexible thinking, rather than being the typical spoiled boomer and wanting everything handed to you on a silver platter.
And before you get all pissy about that appellation, Im a late boomer who is embarrassed to be forced into that category, given how those of us at the tail end of the boomers have ZERO in common with the rest of you. Those of us born as JFK babies were no older than 8 when Woodstock happened, FFS. What would we know know about the classic boomer 60s peace love dope experiences? I know as much about that as I do about what lies under the frosted crust of Europa.
brush
(61,033 posts)It's split down the middle as it's always been.
Aquaria
(1,076 posts)Keep living in denial, there, when all the numbers say otherwise.
pstokely
(10,853 posts)?
Esperanto.Mark
(17 posts)Mass transit has changed dramatically over the past century, increasing diversity and enriching our global perspective. The internet (if used correctly) has greatly accelerated this process.
What worldview we are exposed to at an early age seems to greatly impact our future decision making for the rest of our lives.
Sea Glass
(52 posts)The younger generations don't buy into propaganda like many older people. They tend to see through lies spewed by corporations, politicians, and religious leaders. They know their very existence has been put in jeopardy by Republicans and their anti-environment allies.
Esperanto.Mark
(17 posts)in a generation in which you have access to most of recorded knowledge in the palm of your hand can be pretty enlightening...
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(24,604 posts)BlueTexasMan
(179 posts)We the elders of Texas that still use our brains (busy being born) have been instrumental in turning our county blue last election! The others, I imagine, they just stopped thinking years ago, or never did. They probably hobble to the voter booths because they don't like long hair. My mother (still alive) told me, " Don't tell Daddy you voted for a black man." Sad and typical. Keep on truckin'! We WILL overcome!
Aristus
(71,707 posts)I've lived in reliably-blue Washington State for decades now. I appreciate the things you and your fellow blue Texans are doing to turn my erstwhile home state into a blue state. I have nothing but fond memories of growing up in Texas, but they are soured by its current status as a red haven.
Aquaria
(1,076 posts)San Antonio, the rest of South Texas and the other major cities are blue now.
We get more purple with each passing year, as well. Once Texas flips, its over for the traitor conservatrash party.
And then it could very well be taco trucks on every corner. I certainly dont have to go too far to find one, even in my uptight white Northwest Side neighborhood.
You know la raza are taking over when you have taco trucks almost on the doorstep of Shavano Park, guey.
Aristus
(71,707 posts)Crunchy Frog
(28,214 posts)Aristus
(71,707 posts)n/t
Chakaconcarne
(2,772 posts)It's the only way they can cheat and blame it on someone else.
IronLionZion
(50,841 posts)it's that damn "silent and older" generation that is the problem.
Poorer people tend to die earlier if they can't afford health care. There are other reasons of course, like people who grew up with less diversity might be more conservative about issues that impact only other people. And the conservative mindset tends to believe the past was better in many ways, while the liberal mindset looks forward to the future that we'd like to build.
DFW
(59,755 posts)After all, we're coming to take you away, ha ha ho ho hee hee.................
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)They grew up during Vietnam and Watergate. You'd think they'd be much more liberal than they are.
Thekaspervote
(35,815 posts)FBaggins
(28,649 posts)It assumes that political affiliation can be tied to generation and largely remains unchanged. That isn't the case. Married couples in their 50s with children tend to be more conservative than single people just out of college. That's partly because conservatives might be more likely to get married and have kids... but it's mostly because different stages of life impact our political beliefs. Not for everyone of course... but in the broad-brush terms of the OP.
You'd think they'd be much more liberal than they are.
Put more accurately... they were more liberal than they are.
Eyeball_Kid
(7,604 posts)starkly different than others. I can't see how any boomer could be a GOPer, but that's not in the numbers. People did decide differently. Hell, I've got a sibling who thinks Trumpy isn't a racist and would vote for him again. It's driven by emotion. That's all I know.
Mariana
(15,613 posts)The majority of Boomers voted for Trump in 2016. Hopefully, enough of them are turning away from the Republican Party to reverse that in 2020.
Sea Glass
(52 posts)Many of their friends turned out to be wealthy racist right wing assholes, with some exceptions. So disappointing. But they are largely in their 80s now, soooo ...
Turbineguy
(39,855 posts)younger (20's and 30's) trump cultists. How does he appeal to them? Do they seriously think that taking a dump in a gold plated toilet is in their future?
pstokely
(10,853 posts)nt
captdemo
(28 posts)Without the fear of being drafted into war, I'm not sure the boomer generation (I am a boomer) would have become liberal.
Younger generations will continue to be concerned about global warming because they are likely to witness more of it first-hand. They are not as likely to become science-deniers when they see the results of the warming right in front of them!
The Democratic Party needs to place the Climate Emergency front and center! If it does, it will stay relevant for younger generations!
Sea Glass
(52 posts)not just for political reasons, but because it really is the main issue of our time. And our time is running out rapidly.
braddy
(3,585 posts)In 1968 our bloodiest year of the war, the Democrats won 47% of the 21 to 29 year old vote (pre 18 yr. old vote).
The under 30s were also the strongest supporters of our involvement in Vietnam, especially in the later years.
captdemo
(28 posts)In the group of people I hung out with, the Vietnam war was unpopular.
But, thanks for the reminder that we should never think of the people we know as indicative of the trends in the country.
I my high school, the ROTC only had one student! He was very unpopular for joining.
I didn't know of a single person who wanted to take part in that "Police Action" (which is what my dad called it.)
braddy
(3,585 posts)politics, the draft, Vietnam, etc. 10 million boomers served in the military and our Vietnam war dead were 70% volunteers while our WWII war dead were 70% draftees.
captdemo
(28 posts)I think the media needs to rewrite history to make the boomers the latest of the enemies of the people. By keeping arbitrarily defined factions (such as generations) at odds with each other, the corporate class maintains their power over us all.
Brother Buzz
(39,604 posts)Most of the draftees during the Second World were volunteers, and a SIGNIFICANT number of the volunteers in Vietnam were initially drafted. That's a fact, Jack.
braddy
(3,585 posts)for WWII.
Brother Buzz
(39,604 posts)A SIGNIFICANT number of the volunteers in Vietnam enlisted before getting drafted.
During the Second World War, the draft was a tool to regulate the influx of people to keep it running smoothly; volunteers were sent home and told to wait.
I was a member of The Army of the United States, AUS, but was surrounded by NG (ARNG), AR (USAR), and RA in basic training and AIT. Fully 90% of them joined to avoid being drafted. That's a fact, Jack.
braddy
(3,585 posts)basic and AIT and Jump School, enlisting to avoid the draft was to try and get into the Navy or Air Force or at least a non combat arms job, that is why the U.S. went totally draft in 1943, too many enlistees were trying to avoid ground combat.
In Vietnam 70% of our combat deaths were volunteers, they were not trying to escape the draft by enlisting for ground combat in Vietnam.
Aquaria
(1,076 posts)Because it stays on the forward-facing side of all issues, climate, economics, labor, science, environment, education, foreign policy, and more.
Thats why we, unlike the traitor conservatrash, dont need to worry about staying relevant with not only the younger generations but also the older people who care about their fellow humans and the world around us. When youre on the right side of history, you always stay relevant.
captdemo
(28 posts)Staying on the side of reality always wins with the people who matter. History will certainly be harsh toward the deniers.
NNadir
(37,324 posts)...disgusts me.
Overall, we were whiny, overly coddled, spoiled, cowards.
I realized this when I was playing, appropriately, softball with some "friends" in the 80's, and all those guys who evaded the draft and opposed the war, ended up singing praises of Ronald Reagan's tax cut and thinking about how much more useless toxic junk they could buy.
It broke my heart.
rickyhall
(5,506 posts)All but 1 recession/depression since '29 happened under Repug rule.
Thekaspervote
(35,815 posts)flibbitygiblets
(7,220 posts)so these stats may not change over time. And good news/bad news, people live longer than they used to. Well, I should say, they DID until the past couple of years...
My point is, the elderly are more fearful. They're afraid of death, they're afraid of not being able to physically defend themselves. They are more easily frightened by fearmongering politicians and right-wing news outlets.
I don't think this problem is going to "die off". I think we need to take better care of our elders so they're not as susceptible to irrational fear driving them to vote against everyone's best interests.
DrToast
(6,414 posts)There is no credible research that shows people become more conservative as they age.
The single best predictor for how someone will vote in their lifetime? How they voted in their first election.
SharonClark
(10,497 posts)Always said women get more radical as they age.
FakeNoose
(40,261 posts)I remained independent for most of my life, even though I voted Dem in every election. I didn't actually join the Democratic Party until 2008 because I wanted to vote for Hillary in the primary. So there are lots of indies just like I used to be, who are really Democrats and vote blue all or most of the time. Not everyone joins the party, and that's OK.
We just need to know we can count on the independents when the chips are down.
And next year the CHIPS ARE REALLY DOWN.
sandensea
(23,132 posts)As people get older, they tend to become misanthropes - not everyone, of course; but probably a majority. It's just human nature.
And for white voters, this usually means becoming an Archie Bunker-style racist (again, a majority - not everyone).
These neo-fascists in every country with eroding white majorities know this - and it works.
It is what it is.
Sea Glass
(52 posts)sandensea
(23,132 posts)What I described certainly applies to many of my relatives, sad to say - but it's good to know the exception is becoming greater than the rule.
Thanks for sharing.
Sea Glass
(52 posts)Hope this holds for decades!
DrToast
(6,414 posts)People dont get more conservative just because they get older. No research shows that to be the case.
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)I have pointed it out here since 2002. Nobody cares. They prefer the tired flawed conventional wisdom that people become more conservative as they age.
As you emphasized in your prior post, the single greatest indicator is now people voted in their first election. Partisanship is typically forged when a person becomes of voting age. And the single most influential variable at that time is the popularity of the sitting president, and which party he belongs to.
The Silent Generation has always been reliably Republican because they turned 18 when either an unpopular Democrat (Truman) or very popular Republican (Eisenhower) was in office. They didn't become conservative. They always were conservative.
Contrast to the 1994 midterm election when senior citizens were the only group that voted dependably blue. That's because it was the Greatest Generation toward the end of their lives. That generation was politically imprinted as Democratic leaning from the outset, since they became of voting age under an unpopular Republican (Hoover) or popular Democrat (FDR).
Systems are not preferred around here. Subjectivity rules, no matter how tiring and ineffective. Subjectivity has led to Trump resigning at least a half dozen times.
usaf-vet
(7,760 posts).... are important to them. IN 2018 Michigan DOUBLED their young voter turn out by adding a marijuana legalization initiative and an initiative that would make gerrymandering and voter suppression against the law. BOTH initiatives PASSED with large margins.
To bring out young voters we need ballot initiatives on every ballot in every precinct that are important to young voters.
We need to start now to get those initiatives on ballots.
Sea Glass
(52 posts)Every swing state should have a ballot initiative that appeals to the young voters.
usaf-vet
(7,760 posts)What I didn't mention in the above post is that Michael Moore was one of the driving forces in Michigan in 2018.
It seems to me he would be a great national spokesperson for the ballot initiatives in all 50 states
IN 2018 Michigan DOUBLED their young voter turn out by adding a marijuana legalization initiative and an initiative that would make gerrymandering and voter suppression against the law. BOTH initiatives PASSED with large margins.
I was slightly surprised that making gerrymandering and voter suppression against the law was that popular amongst the younger voters.
Someone who reads this and may have a contact for Michael Moore please run with this ball.
stopdiggin
(15,053 posts)than at any point in history. How to harness that energy toward real world goals is the equation that needs solved. Unfortunately, along with being more informed and engaged, they have also absorbed some of our current toxicity in regards suspicion and distrust of "institutions." Along with their many strengths, the young have a pronounced aversion to "structure." That is not necessarily a misplaced concern (as we have all seen) .. on the other hand, it is an illusion to think you can organize and run a country (or society) with start-ups, instagram, twitter feeds, and go-fund-me drives (the electronic equivalent of cake sales and town hall meetings). You need not only networking but also the leadership and structure where those things can be made effective. (and funding tends to help the cause as well .. as evil as we all know money and it's sources to be)
And, with all of that .. they are still way, way, WAY ahead of where many boomers were at a similar age and stage of development. (and when someone says "OK boomer" .. I always assume they're talking about Esiason .. and he deserves it!)
DFW
(59,755 posts)Not enough Republicans? They will just buy more of them.
snowybirdie
(6,574 posts)Stop wishing for us old farts to pass on! The 33% of Silent generation folks are with you and we WILL vote Blue, no matter who!
scheming daemons
(25,487 posts)I want those of you that are voting blue to live to be 100 years old.
And convince your contemporaries to stay home.
NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)It weakens the party and generates negativity. Negativity generates apathy. Apathy discourages voter turnout. Low voter turnout gives Republicans a chance to steal the elections.
comradebillyboy
(10,937 posts)NurseJackie
(42,862 posts)Thank you!
I deeply despise and have the greatest level of contempt for anyone who would LIE and denigrate the Democratic party in that way. It serves no good purpose and it only helps the GOP and Trump and the Russians.
dalton99a
(92,265 posts)dlk
(13,122 posts)calimary
(89,096 posts)DetlefK
(16,670 posts)Trump doesn't count, because he's still in office.
George W. Bush? The GOP refuses to acknowledge that he ever existed.
George Bush? Nobody remembers that that guy existed.
Ronald Reagan? That obscure 80s guy young people know by name only.
marlakay
(13,023 posts)Back then the republicans were more like democrats now.
comradebillyboy
(10,937 posts)A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.
I think that's applicable to most aspects of human endeavor. So extrapolating from Plank, change in society comes as the newer generation replaces the older generation.
So you youngsters just have to wait till us Boomers die off. Or you could get out and vote.
Sea Glass
(52 posts)(Of course a lot of Gen Z isn't old enough to vote yet.)

LiberalFighter
(53,544 posts)There are 2 million in the latter group (65 or older) dying each year. That is 8 million that will have died by election 2020. I look at 60% being Republican or leaning.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Sancho
(9,177 posts)Gothmog
(175,251 posts)11 Bravo
(24,281 posts)I told them both (half-jokingly) I don't care who you vote for, but VOTE, or you're out of the will!
tiredtoo
(2,949 posts)I fall into the 33 percent. Most of the republicans of my acquaintance are in the boomer group. They are the ones fearing the losses of white privilege and so on.. My sentiments are driven primarily for my children/grandchildren. They have a future and i am voting to assure a good future for them.
Aquaria
(1,076 posts)And she made the same observation about how many of the young people in their 50s and 60s were supporters of Agolf Twitler.
Couldnt argue with her, although I did remind her that most people dont call those of us in our 50s and 60s young.
LiberalArkie
(19,336 posts)Mariana
(15,613 posts)They came to Charlottesville from all over the country, and they added up to a few hundred. Meanwhile, the majority of voters over 45 cast their ballots for Trump - tens of millions of them.
Amishman
(5,917 posts)Unfortunately people in general end up more conservative as they age.
Don't assume demographic inevitability. We have to work for it
LS_Editor
(920 posts)It's not comforting and doesn't undo the massive damage being done to our country by the GOP.
warmfeet
(3,321 posts)eva.
May they die even sooner than expected. Much sooner.
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(133,042 posts)So they'll try to take a few of us with them
Luciferous
(6,556 posts)doc03
(38,849 posts)may not matter in the future.
ArcticFox
(1,249 posts)My dad died last month. Lifelong Republican. I loved him regardless
AlexSFCA
(6,319 posts)gop knows it better than anyone else.
Skittles
(169,721 posts)nitpicker
(7,153 posts)It can be difficult to vote.
My northern VA precinct has the nearest bus route come a half-mile away from the school.
And the one running by the garden apartments has its closest approach at the foot of a moderately steep hill.
There is the option of absentee voting in person at the courthouse or by mail, but it's usually the elderly who do that.
In my personal experience, except for presidential primaries and presidential elections, most of the garden-apartment registered voters don't bother to vote. ((One post-9/11 kid did last month, but that was an exception.)) We do get a few cyclists, but generally it's Gen X and older, usually home-owned, that turn out in person.
Unless people organize, e.g. give rides to the polls, IMO it won't change Here in My precinct.
Va Lefty
(6,252 posts)brooklynite
(96,882 posts)But an Instagram post is so much easier...
treestar
(82,383 posts)It's always this way; that's the problem.
RobertDevereaux
(2,024 posts)TruckFump
(5,837 posts)I cannot stand this RWNJ bullcrap.