Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAnd there is it....one person votes present.
How much do you want to bet that it was Tulsi Gabbard?
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
And there is it....one person votes present. (Original Post)
StevieM
Dec 2019
OP
StevieM
(10,580 posts)1. Confirmation!! It is Gabbard. (eom)
Shell_Seas
(3,567 posts)2. They just confirmed it
FM123
(10,375 posts)3. Tulsi, of course. Claire McCaskill just commented "how stupid"
question everything
(52,223 posts)4. And who are the two non voting?
spooky3
(38,726 posts)5. Peterson? and the NJ rep who may switch parties nt
question everything
(52,223 posts)6. These are the Nay
But if you look at the image there are Yea, Nay Pres and NV
spooky3
(38,726 posts)8. oh, sorry, I misread your question nt
StevieM
(10,580 posts)7. No, those two voted against impeachment.
I think the poster was referring to the two people who were recorded as not voting, at least when we stopped seeing it on our screens.
StevieM
(10,580 posts)9. It is possible that they did ultimately vote, but not until after it was taken off the screen.
I am not sure.
It is also possible that they are absent from the house today, perhaps due to illness.
Skittles
(172,185 posts)10. of course it was her