Trump attempts to out CIA Whistleblower

[dewsgirl]

Link to tweet

?s=20

[braddy]

1. The name has been being posted here since at least October, it is hardly a secret.

[dewsgirl]

2. Its the fact that he finally did it. Honestly, I am on DU

several times a day everyday and I have never seen it once here. Of course I have on Twitter, although not once amongst Resistance Twitter.

[braddy]

3. Do a search of DU for Eric's name, why are we all supposed to act like public news that is almost

everywhere is forbidden for us to say out loud.

[dewsgirl]

4. It's honoring the Whistleblower's wishes to stay anonymous.

He honored his country by coming forward, we wouldn't have got the impeachment without him. The least we can do for him would be not to repeat his name.

[braddy]

6. This guy was being mentioned as a leaker here in July of 2017, pretending that the world

doesn't know his name while it is everywhere is Orwellian and just plain scary bizarre.

[dewsgirl]

8. You realize his life is at risk, don't you? He has 24 hour protection

at the moment, due to all the threats he's getting. Trump and all his deplorables blame him and him alone for the events of the last couple months, which is absurd, since 12 other witnesses have came forward and testified.

[tavernier]

16. Didn't know his name. I assume from your post that's it.

My son in law is known for blabbing every tv show spoiler.
Daughter has come close to killing him.

[braddy]

19. His name has been out there in many sources.

Examples

From October
https://www.realclearinvestigations.com/articles/2019/10/30/whistleblower_exposed_close_to_biden_brennan_dnc_oppo_researcher_120996.html

November
http://thejewishvoice.com/2019/11/21/who-exactly-is-the-whistleblower-in-the-ukraine-affair-more-on-cia-analyst-eric-ciaramella/

Oct. or Nov.
https://heavy.com/news/2019/10/eric-ciaramella/

Complaints about Eric sabotaging Trump go back to at least July of 2017.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/07/10/trumps-trolls-are-waging-war-on-americas-civil-servants/

[dewsgirl]

17. And I did search, not once does his name appear

in a thread title.

[braddy]

18. Who said it had to be in a title, but it did show up didn't it.

[cwydro]

5. I'm out of the loop.

Here a lot, and I do watch news - but somehow I’ve missed this.

[braddy]

7. That's just it, the news is 'almost' everywhere, the only people pretending to be in the dark are

the media that we used to think was where we got our news from.

[cwydro]

9. Way too many prepositions in your post for me to make any sense of it lol.

[dewsgirl]

11. The name has been out there for awhile now, but most

Last edited Fri Dec 27, 2019, 09:20 PM - Edit history (1)

Dems and all MSM even FOX, minus one rogue weekend host, have respected the Whistleblowers wishes. And he still is getting so many death threats, that he has a 24 hr security detail. I have even seen where they have considered witness protection. Even though 12 other witnesses come forward and testified, Trump and his supporters blame only him, for everything.

[Mr. Ected]

10. Meanwhile, Adam Schiff jots in his professional journal

Add "violate federal law by broadcasting the name of an alleged whistleblower" to the next article of impeachment.

[dewsgirl]

12. Indeed, he just keeps adding to the list.

[pangaia]

13. Everybody knows the whistle blower is Mike Pense. What's the big secret?

[thenelm1]

14. Gee, that'll make a difference.

It's a classic case of closing the barn doors after all the animals have escaped. What the heck is this supposed to accomplish? This idea that the original whistleblower complaint, if false, somehow negates every bit of the subsequent testimony that followed is just nuts! Trump's nuts, but that everything that followed the complaint becomes invalid is just whack-a-doodle nonsense.

[dewsgirl]

15. It's like saying the 911 caller should be arrested.🙄