Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

PCIntern

(25,544 posts) Wed Jan 8, 2020, 07:54 AM Jan 2020

I think I'm beginning to "get it" :

If you threaten a regime that if it doesn’t investigate your political opponent you’ll withhold the much-needed aid, and then give them the money anyway, then it’s “no harm, no foul”. If a regime launches missiles at your airbase and there are no casualties then again “no harm, no foul”.

This can be rather fun for some people. For others, a living nightmare.

1 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I think I'm beginning to "get it" : (Original Post) PCIntern Jan 2020 OP

No Trump real estate was harmed by the airstrikes. No harm, no foul. CaptYossarian Jan 2020 #1

CaptYossarian

(6,448 posts)

1. No Trump real estate was harmed by the airstrikes. No harm, no foul.

Reply to PCIntern (Original post)

Wed Jan 8, 2020, 08:36 AM

Jan 2020

Reply to this discussion

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I think I'm beginning to ...