They only need one witness.

[kentuck]

Donald J Trump

[AncientGeezer]

1. Not going to happen......Then what?

[kentuck]

2. Then they would still only need one witness.

McConnell said he wanted it to be just like the Clinton trial. Not only did they tape video him under oath, they also took his blood.

Does McConnell really want it to be like the Clinton trial?

Then call in Bill Clinton.

[boston bean]

5. His testimony was used in the trial.

In this case we have the obstructor in chief who ordered people not to testify.

So, it would be like Clintons to get him on record, no natter when they get it

I wouldn’t assume the poster doesn’t know. But that perhaps you were not thinking about it in the same way.

[AncientGeezer]

6. It was an Article...perjury...because of a previous deposition.

I'm just telling kentuck he's wrong....the tape wasn't impeachment forced.

We have the court system available to us to force testimony...or at least appearance...and then they play the 5thA card...if we wait for well..ever.

The election is going to happen before we get a SCOTUS ruling...

[spanone]

3. I'm hearing he 'wants a spectacle'.....give him the floor.

[a kennedy]

7. He'd lie anyway....HE DOES NOT KNOW HOW TO TELL THE TRUTH.

[smirkymonkey]

10. +1000

Exactly. Pointless. Then again, I think it would be pointless for any republican witness. Because they all lie.

[BuffaloJackalope]

8. With a shock collar hooked up to a lie detector

[Initech]

9. I'd personally love to see Sean Hannity called to the stand.