General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVermont bill would ban cellphones for anyone under 21
A state senator in Vermont introduced legislation this week that would make it illegal for anyone under the age of 21 to use or possess a cellphone.
The bill, sponsored by state Sen. John Rodgers (D), says cellphones have been linked to loss of life among teenagers, from distracted driving to cyber bullying that results in suicides, the Barre Montpelier Times Argus reported Wednesday.
The bill text says: The Internet and social media, accessed primarily through cell phones, are used to radicalize and recruit terrorists, fascists, and other extremists. Cell phones have often been used by mass shooters of younger ages for research on previous shootings.
Violation would result in a misdemeanor that is punishable by a maximum of a year behind bars and a $1,000 fine.
Rodgers, however, said he doesn't expect the measure to become law, adding that he introduced the bill to make a point.
Rodgers argued that the state legislature seems bent on taking away our Second Amendment rights and that based on the information in the bill, a cellphone is more dangerous than a gun.
The legislation reportedly says suicide and suicide prevention were discussed repeatedly when the state legislature passed a bill requiring a 24-hour waiting period before purchasing a firearm. Gov. Phil Scott (R) later vetoed the measure.
https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/477655-vermont-bill-would-ban-cellphones-for-anyone-under-21?__twitter_impression=true
Squinch
(51,004 posts)The conflation with guns, though, is imbecilic.
Coventina
(27,172 posts)I didn't have a cell phone until my 30s and I somehow survived.
John Fante
(3,479 posts)Kids in the 1800s survived without electricity and indoor plumbing. Doesn't mean it was an ideal way to go through life.
NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)I think people who make posts like that should be stripped of all modern conveniences and technology and left to live in a cabin on some remote island.
lame54
(35,321 posts)Coventina
(27,172 posts)Nature Man
(869 posts)that is, if they made it past infant mortality and plague.
obamanut2012
(26,137 posts)It is an "academic old wives' tale."
They didn't even usually marry until then. People lived very close to what people lived to in say the 1940s, if they made it past childhood diseases. Just like those who were born and grew up to young adulthood before vaccines and antibiotics within our parents' and grandparents' lifetimes.
obamanut2012
(26,137 posts)obamanut2012
(26,137 posts)I'm an older Gen Xer, and my mom (who is an older Boomer, so #notallboomers, I guess) has said many times she wishes we had had cells back when I was in middle school and high school.
For safety reasons when my friends (girls) and I were at the mall, the movies, a park having a picnic, Girl Scouts, etc., she we could easily contact her or my dad, or friends' parents, or 911, etc. The same for all my high school sports and after-school activities.
My Mom is an older Boomer, and she 100% disagrees with this stance, but she is also not one to think her Generation knows what they are doing (ir so many of her fellow Boomers voted for Trump, unlike her and my father).
phylny
(8,386 posts)but there were payphones on every corner or in stores. My children got cell phones when they were going to be participating either in after-school sports, driving, or were they were going to be away for me for a period of time.
xmas74
(29,676 posts)We use our cells to communicate day-to-day information. I call and move people for coverage, they use their cells for directions for doctor appointments,home visits,etc.
We have college students working here because the pay is better than fast food, they have benefits, they receive tuition reimbursement and it helps with experience in some fields. Without a cell they couldn't work here; it's unfortunately a requirement of the job.
Ms. Toad
(34,087 posts)BUT - I made ample use of the pay phones that were available all over, and other phones that children these days do not have access to.
Our daughter got a cell phone when she was old enough to drive, because I never want her to be stuck on the road without the means to get assistance.
ProudMNDemocrat
(16,789 posts)We have a hands off law here where you either gave a Bluetooth system or something else to keep your hands on the wheel sbdc eyes on the road.
Our Chevy Crude has a built in Bluetooth system to receive calls while driving.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,431 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,211 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,431 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)"Solution" is a disastrous political move.
MineralMan
(146,329 posts)This is not one of the ones that become law.
Blue_true
(31,261 posts)That person is a prime example of the politically clueless. There are many ways to attack the problems that he listed, he grabbed for the worst of them.
MineralMan
(146,329 posts)Even GOOPers are smart enough to know what the results of that would be.
Baclava
(12,047 posts)Could be a good South Park episode though, lol
Coventina
(27,172 posts)Baclava
(12,047 posts)Pity the poor 6th grader that is the only one in their class without an iphone.
Horrifying to them, im sure
Coventina
(27,172 posts)Not sure why this one can't.
DavidDvorkin
(19,485 posts)Therefore, modern parents can just do without those, too.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,431 posts)Coventina
(27,172 posts)EllieBC
(3,041 posts)I had to call my mom at work (she could be reached, my dad couldnt at his job) every day when I got home.
It was stressful for my mom. Lazy parenting would have saved her a lot of stress and worry 5 days a week.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,431 posts)Mariana
(14,860 posts)Plenty of parents have to work to keep bills paid and food in the house, and also want to make sure their kids are where they're supposed to be. Learning to use the modern tools that are available to them is the very opposite of lazy parenting.
krawhitham
(4,647 posts)Archae
(46,345 posts)What makes "21" the magic number?
People under 21 already can't buy cigs and booze, so now this guy says "NO CELL PHONES, CUZ DEM KIDS DOES BAD STUFF!"
"[H]e introduced the bill to make a point."
Yeah, he sure did.
He's an asshole.
Wolf Frankula
(3,601 posts)it is a magic number. It is the product of the number 3, the number of the trinity, and the number 7, the magic number. It's just superstitious twaddle.
But if we take away their cell phones, let Vermont institute the 'Youth Wage'. People under 21 can be paid a dollar a day. And have the 'I know what I said but' clause. That's where an employer can say on payday to workers under 21, "I know what I said but that was then and this is now. You don't get paid."
That fool needs to be voted out of office.
Wolf
Stinky The Clown
(67,818 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(101,361 posts)"the state legislature seems bent on taking away our Second Amendment rights and that based on the information in the bill, a cellphone is more dangerous than a gun"
Guns are designed to kill, and do; a 24 hour waiting period for such a weapon wouldn't have much effect, but it's complete bullshit to call that "taking away our Second Amendment rights".
His bill claims
"The use of cell phones while driving is one of the leading killers of teenagers in the United States. According to the United States Department of Transportation, cell phones are involved in 1.6 million automobile crashes each year, causing half a million injuries and 6,000 deaths. Each day, 11 teenagers die in automobile crashes in this country. "
The DoT actually says "In 2017 alone, 3,166 people were killed in motor vehicle crashes involving distracted drivers", though doesn't specify if that's all cell phone distraction (as opposed to, say, people working sat navs or music systems). The "11 teenagers die a day" must be from all causes, not just phones, so he is manipulating the statistics. To defend his precious guns.
What a wanker.
getagrip_already
(14,837 posts)But you can't possess a cellphone?
That's f'd up.
ismnotwasm
(42,008 posts)But mind bogglingly short sighted
irisblue
(33,022 posts)What about ppl like the 19 yr old who delivers food & groceries?
This is foolish IMO. Cellphones are a fact of life.
malthaussen
(17,216 posts)packman
(16,296 posts)smoking, drinking, voting - but an 18 yr. old could sign up for the military or even be drafted. All B.S., never will happen. If he is that concerned about cell phones leading to car deaths, make the legal age to drive 21.
dalton99a
(81,570 posts)Stupid meaningless gesture
Dennis Donovan
(18,770 posts)Boomerproud
(7,964 posts)Go get a job at a "think tank".
bullwinkle428
(20,630 posts)Binkie The Clown
(7,911 posts)Kids walking home from school get approached by some shady character and have no way to call home for help? Really?
Kids at the mall waiting for one of the parents to pick them up, but the parent forgot, so they have no way to call another parent for a ride? Are you kidding me?
Teen is driving home from his job at the burger joint and has car trouble, but can't call dad to come and help? Unbelievable!
Kid taking a walk with his dad when the dad falls over with a heart attack, or trips and is knocked unconscious on the sidewalk, and the kid can't call 911 because it's illegal for him to use a cell phone? Insane!
We wonder why the right ridicules "liberals" all the time? It's because at times some liberals go to ridiculous extremes and make complete fools of themselves. This is such a time.
Please, lets not give the right more ammunition to laugh at us.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)underpants
(182,877 posts)We put in a Blink system when she was too old for day care and didn't have a phone. We knew she was home.
WestLosAngelesGal
(268 posts)... I have not seen a payphone for years.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Superman just says, I cant even!
BuffaloJackalope
(818 posts)Blue_true
(31,261 posts)I would prefer to educate kids in school about the dangers and benefits of cellphones.
ecstatic
(32,731 posts)a phone these days. I don't necessarily agree with that. I don't think it's safe for kids to be exposed to that level of radiation, not to mention, most parents are clueless about how to set up effective parental controls. The lack of oversight means kids are free to explore and stumble upon the darkest corners of the internet.
NutmegYankee
(16,201 posts)Radio waves? The same stuff blasting around you right now for TVs, Stereos, wireless phones, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Don't freak out but did you know that right now your probably looking at radiation in the hundreds of terahertz. Like, OMG, it's entering your eyes!
obamanut2012
(26,137 posts)What you stated as fact is a woo science anti vaxxer demographic claim. It is not true.
ecstatic
(32,731 posts)I admit, I haven't put a lot of time and effort into researching this topic. For me, it seems like a common sense issue, but based on the militant responses in defense of young children handling phones all day, I guess not.
Do you have a link to a study that shows that it's 100% safe for growing bodies? I'll wait, and here's a great starting point: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?term=Radiation+mobile+phones
lunatica
(53,410 posts)And thats just on first purview of this ridiculous bill. Its not only ridiculous but its also mind bogglingly idiotic on so many levels!
hunter
(38,326 posts)By the time our youngest was in middle school it was true, just as they'd always complained, most of their friends *really did* have cell phones.
We gave our kids cell phones with limited texts and minutes and they hated that, but they mostly lived within their budget. The younger kids in our family can't even imagine that.
When I was a kid our family had one phone in the kitchen, and there was zero privacy.
On one college break I was home visiting, the kitchen was empty, so I decided to call my girlfriend... within seconds it seemed there were half a dozen people in the kitchen having some sudden business there, including my grandma who was living with my parents at the time.
My wife is the only girlfriend I ever brought home to my parents. My own kids were never so shy.
Mariana
(14,860 posts)but only because my dad worked for the phone company, and got the extra phones (on the same line) for free. When i was in high school, most of my friends and I used CB radios.
retread
(3,763 posts)Response to RandySF (Original post)
Takket This message was self-deleted by its author.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)Ms. Toad
(34,087 posts)Maybe we can even bring back pee-sticks.
I hear kidney transplants are all the rage. (A college friend just died - and all of my younger cousins with T1 diabetes have died. I only have one peer my age with T1 diabetes who is still alive - my guess is that this generation's T1 diabetics will live a decade or two longer because of the ability for continuous glucose monitoring and correction a capability that is available because of cell phones.)
Response to RandySF (Original post)
Name removed Message auto-removed
ooky
(8,928 posts)Says all anyone needs to know about this stupid bill.
SlogginThroughIt
(1,977 posts)You didnt have a cell phone when you were a kid when nobody else had cell phones? Wow!!!!
Look we arent putting the genie back in the bottle. Whether you like it or not younger peoples world is much different than yours was when you were that age. Likely it is different than yours is right now.
I am sorry but I like knowing where my kid is. I like my kid being able to call me for help. I like that my kid knows how to use technology and I fully understand it is my role as a parent to help them to understand how to use it, what is appropriate and how to be responsible. My eldest has had an ipad since she was 7. She has had an iphone since she was 9 so that she could keep in touch with her Dad who is on the road a lot and so that she could keep in touch with her father estranged grandparents. Because of her having GPS on her with her phone we have been able to allow her more freedom to explore our neighborhood. And now that she is a 13 yr old having crossed over puberty you can bet your ass my wife and I make sure she has her phone on her at ALL TIMES when she is out of the house. She is very active in team sports, clubs, and friend groups and that means she is not always under parental supervision -WHICH IS REALLY GOOD FOR HER. Granted this is anecdotal but because she has been able have more independence with the ability to contact us if needed, she has been much more self sufficient. This kid has the confidence to go out in the world. For example, she goes out on trail in the boundary waters for weeks at a time with counselors in a small pack of 6-8 in the group total.
Did having an Iphone create this alone? Of course not but instead if blaming technology or fearing it, people need to understand that like it or not it IS part of their world and the sooner we teach them how to use it responsibly the better equipped they are for using what is a basic tool in THEIR lives. If we keep treating everything the same way we do with alcohol then we can expect to keep having the same problems with those things that we have with alcohol.
obamanut2012
(26,137 posts)For safety reasons when my friends (girls) and I were at the mall, the movies, a park having a picnic, Girl Scouts, etc., she we could easily contact her or my dad, or friends' parents, or 911, etc. The same for all my high school sports and after-school activities.
My Mom is an older Boomer, and she 100% disagrees with this stance.
edit: 21???????? So, people who can legally marry and enlist, who are in college, who are working full-time, aren't allowed to own a cell??????