Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RandySF

(59,206 posts)
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 10:51 AM Jan 2020

Vermont bill would ban cellphones for anyone under 21

A state senator in Vermont introduced legislation this week that would make it illegal for anyone under the age of 21 to use or possess a cellphone.

The bill, sponsored by state Sen. John Rodgers (D), says cellphones have been linked to loss of life among teenagers, from distracted driving to cyber bullying that results in suicides, the Barre Montpelier Times Argus reported Wednesday.

The bill text says: “The Internet and social media, accessed primarily through cell phones, are used to radicalize and recruit terrorists, fascists, and other extremists. Cell phones have often been used by mass shooters of younger ages for research on previous shootings.”

Violation would result in a misdemeanor that is punishable by a maximum of a year behind bars and a $1,000 fine.

Rodgers, however, said he doesn't expect the measure to become law, adding that he introduced the bill to make a point.

Rodgers argued that the state legislature “seems bent on taking away our Second Amendment rights” and that based on the information in the bill, a cellphone is more dangerous than a gun.

The legislation reportedly says suicide and suicide prevention were discussed repeatedly when the state legislature passed a bill requiring a 24-hour waiting period before purchasing a firearm. Gov. Phil Scott (R) later vetoed the measure.



https://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/477655-vermont-bill-would-ban-cellphones-for-anyone-under-21?__twitter_impression=true

69 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Vermont bill would ban cellphones for anyone under 21 (Original Post) RandySF Jan 2020 OP
It won't pass but I think it's a great idea. Squinch Jan 2020 #1
Agree with this 100% Coventina Jan 2020 #2
If any post warranted an "OK boomer", it's this one. John Fante Jan 2020 #26
Absolutely agree! NutmegYankee Jan 2020 #28
The Uni-Boomer lame54 Jan 2020 #41
DUzy! Withywindle Jan 2020 #57
Not a boomer, I'm GenX. n/t Coventina Jan 2020 #36
Kids in the 1200s were considered middle aged in their 20s Nature Man Jan 2020 #46
Except, that has been proven to not be true obamanut2012 Jan 2020 #66
+1 obamanut2012 Jan 2020 #61
100% this obamanut2012 Jan 2020 #64
Well, I didn't have a cell phone either when I was a teenager since I was born in 1958 phylny Jan 2020 #27
There are 18 year olds, fresh out of high school in my field. xmas74 Jan 2020 #45
I was much older than that when I got one Ms. Toad Jan 2020 #53
Dumb idea. ProudMNDemocrat Jan 2020 #3
This is a bad-faith use of the system. WhiskeyGrinder Jan 2020 #4
This just bolsters Republican talking points about how Dems want to micromanage our lives. TheBlackAdder Jan 2020 #5
I mean, he WAS trying to make a point about guns... WhiskeyGrinder Jan 2020 #24
That was my first though. What is he thinking. I know there is a problem, but his Blue_true Jan 2020 #31
Many bills are introduced. Few become law. MineralMan Jan 2020 #6
It won't become law, but it will become a big repugh talking point. Blue_true Jan 2020 #32
Not among Republicans who have teenaged children. MineralMan Jan 2020 #33
Parents of 3rd graders use them to track their kids now, this will never pass! Baclava Jan 2020 #7
Lazy parenting. n/t Coventina Jan 2020 #9
Not really, more a safety concern, being able to contact each other, etc Baclava Jan 2020 #19
Somehow people have been raising kids for thousands of years without digital surveillance. Coventina Jan 2020 #37
And without vaccinations, traffic lights, refrigerated food, ... DavidDvorkin Jan 2020 #49
Using tools to make things more efficient and useful is not lazy. WhiskeyGrinder Jan 2020 #23
Substituting digital surveillance with personal involvement is lazy. n/t Coventina Jan 2020 #38
I was a latchkey kid in the 80s. EllieBC Jan 2020 #47
Doesn't have to be a substitute, of course. WhiskeyGrinder Jan 2020 #48
Bullshit. Lazy parents don't care where their kids are. Mariana Jan 2020 #58
Or maybe people want to be able to find their child after the next school shooting krawhitham Jan 2020 #65
This really is a stupid idea. Archae Jan 2020 #8
21 is the Magic Number Because Wolf Frankula Jan 2020 #63
Stupid bill Stinky The Clown Jan 2020 #10
It's a pretty stupid point he's making, and it's a shame he's a Democrat muriel_volestrangler Jan 2020 #11
you can own and carry an unregistered gun at 18 in vt without a permjit..... getagrip_already Jan 2020 #12
Not only Dumb ismnotwasm Jan 2020 #13
Is he also legally requiring pay phones return in mass? irisblue Jan 2020 #14
Proving the GOP is not the only party with idiots. n/t malthaussen Jan 2020 #15
I remember when 21 was the magic age for everything packman Jan 2020 #16
Yeah, people under 21 don't need to have a job or go to college dalton99a Jan 2020 #17
Car wrecks in general kill teens as much. Does the driver's license age need to go to 21? Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #18
Say goodbye to your political career jerk. Boomerproud Jan 2020 #20
Perhaps he can mandate a re-establishment of the buggy whip industry while he's at it! bullwinkle428 Jan 2020 #21
Terrible idea. Binkie The Clown Jan 2020 #22
+1000 smirkymonkey Jan 2020 #34
I agree. We'd be freaked out if our daughter didn't have a phone. underpants Jan 2020 #51
Not a viable idea and one reason is... WestLosAngelesGal Jan 2020 #25
That's so true! They don't exist anymore. lunatica Jan 2020 #40
Ban cell phones but not guns. GREAT idea. /s BuffaloJackalope Jan 2020 #29
That is going too far. Blue_true Jan 2020 #30
Good luck. I think 8 or 9 is the standard age for getting ecstatic Jan 2020 #35
What radiation? NutmegYankee Jan 2020 #42
And BOOM! the woo science radiation "fact" rears its head obamanut2012 Jan 2020 #67
Link? ecstatic Jan 2020 #68
Parents of teenagers would disagree with this. lunatica Jan 2020 #39
In our extended family we were trying to hold out on cell phones until high school hunter Jan 2020 #43
We had phones in several rooms in the house Mariana Jan 2020 #59
Does the bill provide for treatment of withdrawal symptoms? n/t retread Jan 2020 #44
This message was self-deleted by its author Takket Jan 2020 #50
Good luck with that one. CentralMass Jan 2020 #52
Guess kids with Type 1 Diabetes will have to monitor themselves the old-fashioned way. Ms. Toad Jan 2020 #54
Message auto-removed Name removed Jan 2020 #55
He said he probably wouldn't vote for his own bill. ooky Jan 2020 #56
So tired of this shit. SlogginThroughIt Jan 2020 #60
I'm an older Gen Xer, and my mom has said she wished we have cellphones then obamanut2012 Jan 2020 #62
I'm sure that's going nowhere Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2020 #69

John Fante

(3,479 posts)
26. If any post warranted an "OK boomer", it's this one.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 12:49 PM
Jan 2020

Kids in the 1800s survived without electricity and indoor plumbing. Doesn't mean it was an ideal way to go through life.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
28. Absolutely agree!
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 12:55 PM
Jan 2020

I think people who make posts like that should be stripped of all modern conveniences and technology and left to live in a cabin on some remote island.

Nature Man

(869 posts)
46. Kids in the 1200s were considered middle aged in their 20s
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 07:03 PM
Jan 2020

that is, if they made it past infant mortality and plague.

obamanut2012

(26,137 posts)
66. Except, that has been proven to not be true
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 02:34 PM
Jan 2020

It is an "academic old wives' tale."

They didn't even usually marry until then. People lived very close to what people lived to in say the 1940s, if they made it past childhood diseases. Just like those who were born and grew up to young adulthood before vaccines and antibiotics within our parents' and grandparents' lifetimes.

obamanut2012

(26,137 posts)
64. 100% this
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 02:30 PM
Jan 2020

I'm an older Gen Xer, and my mom (who is an older Boomer, so #notallboomers, I guess) has said many times she wishes we had had cells back when I was in middle school and high school.

For safety reasons when my friends (girls) and I were at the mall, the movies, a park having a picnic, Girl Scouts, etc., she we could easily contact her or my dad, or friends' parents, or 911, etc. The same for all my high school sports and after-school activities.

My Mom is an older Boomer, and she 100% disagrees with this stance, but she is also not one to think her Generation knows what they are doing (ir so many of her fellow Boomers voted for Trump, unlike her and my father).

phylny

(8,386 posts)
27. Well, I didn't have a cell phone either when I was a teenager since I was born in 1958
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 12:54 PM
Jan 2020

but there were payphones on every corner or in stores. My children got cell phones when they were going to be participating either in after-school sports, driving, or were they were going to be away for me for a period of time.

xmas74

(29,676 posts)
45. There are 18 year olds, fresh out of high school in my field.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 07:02 PM
Jan 2020

We use our cells to communicate day-to-day information. I call and move people for coverage, they use their cells for directions for doctor appointments,home visits,etc.

We have college students working here because the pay is better than fast food, they have benefits, they receive tuition reimbursement and it helps with experience in some fields. Without a cell they couldn't work here; it's unfortunately a requirement of the job.

Ms. Toad

(34,087 posts)
53. I was much older than that when I got one
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 09:21 PM
Jan 2020

BUT - I made ample use of the pay phones that were available all over, and other phones that children these days do not have access to.

Our daughter got a cell phone when she was old enough to drive, because I never want her to be stuck on the road without the means to get assistance.

ProudMNDemocrat

(16,789 posts)
3. Dumb idea.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 10:59 AM
Jan 2020

We have a hands off law here where you either gave a Bluetooth system or something else to keep your hands on the wheel sbdc eyes on the road.

Our Chevy Crude has a built in Bluetooth system to receive calls while driving.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
31. That was my first though. What is he thinking. I know there is a problem, but his
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 01:20 PM
Jan 2020

"Solution" is a disastrous political move.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
32. It won't become law, but it will become a big repugh talking point.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 01:24 PM
Jan 2020

That person is a prime example of the politically clueless. There are many ways to attack the problems that he listed, he grabbed for the worst of them.

MineralMan

(146,329 posts)
33. Not among Republicans who have teenaged children.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 01:28 PM
Jan 2020

Even GOOPers are smart enough to know what the results of that would be.

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
7. Parents of 3rd graders use them to track their kids now, this will never pass!
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 11:04 AM
Jan 2020

Could be a good South Park episode though, lol

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
19. Not really, more a safety concern, being able to contact each other, etc
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 11:58 AM
Jan 2020

Pity the poor 6th grader that is the only one in their class without an iphone.

Horrifying to them, im sure

Coventina

(27,172 posts)
37. Somehow people have been raising kids for thousands of years without digital surveillance.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 03:37 PM
Jan 2020

Not sure why this one can't.

DavidDvorkin

(19,485 posts)
49. And without vaccinations, traffic lights, refrigerated food, ...
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 08:01 PM
Jan 2020

Therefore, modern parents can just do without those, too.

EllieBC

(3,041 posts)
47. I was a latchkey kid in the 80s.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 07:48 PM
Jan 2020

I had to call my mom at work (she could be reached, my dad couldn’t at his job) every day when I got home.

It was stressful for my mom. “Lazy” parenting would have saved her a lot of stress and worry 5 days a week.

Mariana

(14,860 posts)
58. Bullshit. Lazy parents don't care where their kids are.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 11:17 PM
Jan 2020

Plenty of parents have to work to keep bills paid and food in the house, and also want to make sure their kids are where they're supposed to be. Learning to use the modern tools that are available to them is the very opposite of lazy parenting.

Archae

(46,345 posts)
8. This really is a stupid idea.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 11:05 AM
Jan 2020

What makes "21" the magic number?

People under 21 already can't buy cigs and booze, so now this guy says "NO CELL PHONES, CUZ DEM KIDS DOES BAD STUFF!"

"[H]e introduced the bill to make a point."

Yeah, he sure did.

He's an asshole.

Wolf Frankula

(3,601 posts)
63. 21 is the Magic Number Because
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 02:29 PM
Jan 2020

it is a magic number. It is the product of the number 3, the number of the trinity, and the number 7, the magic number. It's just superstitious twaddle.

But if we take away their cell phones, let Vermont institute the 'Youth Wage'. People under 21 can be paid a dollar a day. And have the 'I know what I said but' clause. That's where an employer can say on payday to workers under 21, "I know what I said but that was then and this is now. You don't get paid."

That fool needs to be voted out of office.

Wolf

muriel_volestrangler

(101,361 posts)
11. It's a pretty stupid point he's making, and it's a shame he's a Democrat
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 11:11 AM
Jan 2020

"the state legislature “seems bent on taking away our Second Amendment rights” and that based on the information in the bill, a cellphone is more dangerous than a gun"

Guns are designed to kill, and do; a 24 hour waiting period for such a weapon wouldn't have much effect, but it's complete bullshit to call that "taking away our Second Amendment rights".
His bill claims
"The use of cell phones while driving is one of the leading killers of teenagers in the United States. According to the United States Department of Transportation, cell phones are involved in 1.6 million automobile crashes each year, causing half a million injuries and 6,000 deaths. Each day, 11 teenagers die in automobile crashes in this country. "

The DoT actually says "In 2017 alone, 3,166 people were killed in motor vehicle crashes involving distracted drivers", though doesn't specify if that's all cell phone distraction (as opposed to, say, people working sat navs or music systems). The "11 teenagers die a day" must be from all causes, not just phones, so he is manipulating the statistics. To defend his precious guns.

What a wanker.

getagrip_already

(14,837 posts)
12. you can own and carry an unregistered gun at 18 in vt without a permjit.....
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 11:24 AM
Jan 2020

But you can't possess a cellphone?

That's f'd up.

irisblue

(33,022 posts)
14. Is he also legally requiring pay phones return in mass?
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 11:32 AM
Jan 2020

What about ppl like the 19 yr old who delivers food & groceries?

This is foolish IMO. Cellphones are a fact of life.

 

packman

(16,296 posts)
16. I remember when 21 was the magic age for everything
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 11:44 AM
Jan 2020

smoking, drinking, voting - but an 18 yr. old could sign up for the military or even be drafted. All B.S., never will happen. If he is that concerned about cell phones leading to car deaths, make the legal age to drive 21.

Binkie The Clown

(7,911 posts)
22. Terrible idea.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 12:23 PM
Jan 2020

Kids walking home from school get approached by some shady character and have no way to call home for help? Really?

Kids at the mall waiting for one of the parents to pick them up, but the parent forgot, so they have no way to call another parent for a ride? Are you kidding me?

Teen is driving home from his job at the burger joint and has car trouble, but can't call dad to come and help? Unbelievable!

Kid taking a walk with his dad when the dad falls over with a heart attack, or trips and is knocked unconscious on the sidewalk, and the kid can't call 911 because it's illegal for him to use a cell phone? Insane!

We wonder why the right ridicules "liberals" all the time? It's because at times some liberals go to ridiculous extremes and make complete fools of themselves. This is such a time.

Please, lets not give the right more ammunition to laugh at us.

underpants

(182,877 posts)
51. I agree. We'd be freaked out if our daughter didn't have a phone.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 08:14 PM
Jan 2020

We put in a Blink system when she was too old for day care and didn't have a phone. We knew she was home.

Blue_true

(31,261 posts)
30. That is going too far.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 01:18 PM
Jan 2020

I would prefer to educate kids in school about the dangers and benefits of cellphones.

ecstatic

(32,731 posts)
35. Good luck. I think 8 or 9 is the standard age for getting
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 01:31 PM
Jan 2020

a phone these days. I don't necessarily agree with that. I don't think it's safe for kids to be exposed to that level of radiation, not to mention, most parents are clueless about how to set up effective parental controls. The lack of oversight means kids are free to explore and stumble upon the darkest corners of the internet.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
42. What radiation?
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 05:42 PM
Jan 2020

Radio waves? The same stuff blasting around you right now for TVs, Stereos, wireless phones, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, etc. Don't freak out but did you know that right now your probably looking at radiation in the hundreds of terahertz. Like, OMG, it's entering your eyes!

obamanut2012

(26,137 posts)
67. And BOOM! the woo science radiation "fact" rears its head
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 02:38 PM
Jan 2020

What you stated as fact is a woo science anti vaxxer demographic claim. It is not true.

ecstatic

(32,731 posts)
68. Link?
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 03:41 PM
Jan 2020

I admit, I haven't put a lot of time and effort into researching this topic. For me, it seems like a common sense issue, but based on the militant responses in defense of young children handling phones all day, I guess not.

Do you have a link to a study that shows that it's 100% safe for growing bodies? I'll wait, and here's a great starting point: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/?term=Radiation+mobile+phones

lunatica

(53,410 posts)
39. Parents of teenagers would disagree with this.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 03:48 PM
Jan 2020

And that’s just on first purview of this ridiculous bill. It’s not only ridiculous but it’s also mind bogglingly idiotic on so many levels!

hunter

(38,326 posts)
43. In our extended family we were trying to hold out on cell phones until high school
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 05:56 PM
Jan 2020

By the time our youngest was in middle school it was true, just as they'd always complained, most of their friends *really did* have cell phones.

We gave our kids cell phones with limited texts and minutes and they hated that, but they mostly lived within their budget. The younger kids in our family can't even imagine that.

When I was a kid our family had one phone in the kitchen, and there was zero privacy.

On one college break I was home visiting, the kitchen was empty, so I decided to call my girlfriend... within seconds it seemed there were half a dozen people in the kitchen having some sudden business there, including my grandma who was living with my parents at the time.

My wife is the only girlfriend I ever brought home to my parents. My own kids were never so shy.

Mariana

(14,860 posts)
59. We had phones in several rooms in the house
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 02:10 PM
Jan 2020

but only because my dad worked for the phone company, and got the extra phones (on the same line) for free. When i was in high school, most of my friends and I used CB radios.

Response to RandySF (Original post)

Ms. Toad

(34,087 posts)
54. Guess kids with Type 1 Diabetes will have to monitor themselves the old-fashioned way.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 09:28 PM
Jan 2020

Maybe we can even bring back pee-sticks.

I hear kidney transplants are all the rage. (A college friend just died - and all of my younger cousins with T1 diabetes have died. I only have one peer my age with T1 diabetes who is still alive - my guess is that this generation's T1 diabetics will live a decade or two longer because of the ability for continuous glucose monitoring and correction a capability that is available because of cell phones.)

Response to RandySF (Original post)

ooky

(8,928 posts)
56. He said he probably wouldn't vote for his own bill.
Sat Jan 11, 2020, 10:33 PM
Jan 2020

Says all anyone needs to know about this stupid bill.

 

SlogginThroughIt

(1,977 posts)
60. So tired of this shit.
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 02:25 PM
Jan 2020

You didn’t have a cell phone when you were a kid when nobody else had cell phones? Wow!!!!

Look we aren’t putting the genie back in the bottle. Whether you like it or not younger people’s world is much different than yours was when you were that age. Likely it is different than yours is right now.

I am sorry but I like knowing where my kid is. I like my kid being able to call me for help. I like that my kid knows how to use technology and I fully understand it is my role as a parent to help them to understand how to use it, what is appropriate and how to be responsible. My eldest has had an ipad since she was 7. She has had an iphone since she was 9 so that she could keep in touch with her Dad who is on the road a lot and so that she could keep in touch with her father estranged grandparents. Because of her having GPS on her with her phone we have been able to allow her more freedom to explore our neighborhood. And now that she is a 13 yr old having crossed over puberty you can bet your ass my wife and I make sure she has her phone on her at ALL TIMES when she is out of the house. She is very active in team sports, clubs, and friend groups and that means she is not always under parental supervision -WHICH IS REALLY GOOD FOR HER. Granted this is anecdotal but because she has been able have more independence with the ability to contact us if needed, she has been much more self sufficient. This kid has the confidence to go out in the world. For example, she goes out on trail in the boundary waters for weeks at a time with counselors in a small pack of 6-8 in the group total.

Did having an Iphone create this alone? Of course not but instead if blaming technology or fearing it, people need to understand that like it or not it IS part of their world and the sooner we teach them how to use it responsibly the better equipped they are for using what is a basic tool in THEIR lives. If we keep treating everything the same way we do with alcohol then we can expect to keep having the same problems with those things that we have with alcohol.





obamanut2012

(26,137 posts)
62. I'm an older Gen Xer, and my mom has said she wished we have cellphones then
Sun Jan 12, 2020, 02:28 PM
Jan 2020

For safety reasons when my friends (girls) and I were at the mall, the movies, a park having a picnic, Girl Scouts, etc., she we could easily contact her or my dad, or friends' parents, or 911, etc. The same for all my high school sports and after-school activities.

My Mom is an older Boomer, and she 100% disagrees with this stance.

edit: 21???????? So, people who can legally marry and enlist, who are in college, who are working full-time, aren't allowed to own a cell??????

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Vermont bill would ban ce...