General Discussion

dewsgirl

(14,961 posts) Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:28 PM Jan 2020

Please explain Alan Dershowitz's argument in this tweet.

Link to tweet

?s=20

24 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Please explain Alan Dershowitz's argument in this tweet. (Original Post) dewsgirl Jan 2020 OP

Well, I guess Dersh agrees that his arguments are bogus. Tribe didn't say that the Senate should Raven Jan 2020 #1

These people are something else. dewsgirl Jan 2020 #5

No way to explain why Dershowitz doesn't know the difference between "censor" and "sensor" csziggy Jan 2020 #2

"sensor" TwilightZone Jan 2020 #3

Sensor? Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #4

I know, I don't get it. dewsgirl Jan 2020 #6

You're trying to sensor me! Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #19

No pulse, no respiration. He's dead, Jim... Dennis Donovan Jan 2020 #20

get a bricklayer, stat! Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #21

Alan is a pathetic sycophant, saidsimplesimon Jan 2020 #7

This guy's a renowned lawyer, and he can't spell? Beakybird Jan 2020 #8

Before the internet, we had no idea how stupid these people dewsgirl Jan 2020 #10

Bogus as you want to be C_U_L8R Jan 2020 #9

Learn to spell, asshole dalton99a Jan 2020 #11

Recommended. H2O Man Jan 2020 #12

Lol🤣 dewsgirl Jan 2020 #14

Drunk logic. nt canetoad Jan 2020 #13

He meant "spread incensed smoke over my arguments" maxsolomon Jan 2020 #15

😂 dewsgirl Jan 2020 #16

First of all if Tribe's comment refers to his arguments - he is agreeing very are bogus karynnj Jan 2020 #17

I was confused, so I guess he is admitting his arguments are bogus. dewsgirl Jan 2020 #22

Here, this video explains it clearly jberryhill Jan 2020 #18

LOL. It could be more succinct, though. PSPS Jan 2020 #23

That WAS the short version jberryhill Jan 2020 #24

Raven

(13,877 posts)

1. Well, I guess Dersh agrees that his arguments are bogus. Tribe didn't say that the Senate should

Reply to dewsgirl (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:31 PM

Jan 2020

censor (not sensor, Alan) legitimate arguments.

dewsgirl

(14,961 posts)

5. These people are something else.

Reply to Raven (Reply #1)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:33 PM

Jan 2020

csziggy

(34,131 posts)

2. No way to explain why Dershowitz doesn't know the difference between "censor" and "sensor"

Reply to dewsgirl (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:32 PM

Jan 2020

TwilightZone

(25,426 posts)

3. "sensor"

Reply to dewsgirl (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:32 PM

Jan 2020

First, that should be "censor".

Not a good start, Alan.

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)

4. Sensor?

Reply to dewsgirl (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:33 PM

Jan 2020

People actually call him smart?

dewsgirl

(14,961 posts)

6. I know, I don't get it.

Reply to Dennis Donovan (Reply #4)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:34 PM

Jan 2020

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,236 posts)

19. You're trying to sensor me!

Reply to Dennis Donovan (Reply #4)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 08:25 PM

Jan 2020

Is my hat on straight?
How's my bp?

Hey! That thing's not even plugged in.

Dennis Donovan

(18,770 posts)

20. No pulse, no respiration. He's dead, Jim...

Reply to Hermit-The-Prog (Reply #19)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 08:29 PM

Jan 2020

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,236 posts)

21. get a bricklayer, stat!

Reply to Dennis Donovan (Reply #20)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 08:34 PM

Jan 2020

saidsimplesimon

(7,888 posts)

7. Alan is a pathetic sycophant,

Reply to dewsgirl (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:34 PM

Jan 2020

on the clown car arrival with the impeached one wanting a made for porn TV movie

Beakybird

(3,330 posts)

8. This guy's a renowned lawyer, and he can't spell?

Reply to dewsgirl (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:34 PM

Jan 2020

Maybe Fox turned his gifted brain into Jelly.

dewsgirl

(14,961 posts)

10. Before the internet, we had no idea how stupid these people

Reply to Beakybird (Reply #8)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:36 PM

Jan 2020

actually were.

C_U_L8R

(44,983 posts)

9. Bogus as you want to be

Reply to dewsgirl (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:35 PM

Jan 2020

It's right there in the Republican bill of rights.
In their bible too.

dalton99a

(81,386 posts)

11. Learn to spell, asshole

Reply to dewsgirl (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:37 PM

Jan 2020

H2O Man

(73,505 posts)

12. Recommended.

Reply to dewsgirl (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:39 PM

Jan 2020

I'm going to have to disagree with some here. Alan did use the correct word -- sensor." He is convinced that Professor Tribe is serving as a human polygraph. He's correct, and Tribe is calling out Alan D's lies.

dewsgirl

(14,961 posts)

14. Lol🤣

Reply to H2O Man (Reply #12)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:44 PM

Jan 2020

canetoad

(17,134 posts)

13. Drunk logic. nt

Reply to dewsgirl (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:43 PM

Jan 2020

maxsolomon

(33,232 posts)

15. He meant "spread incensed smoke over my arguments"

Reply to dewsgirl (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:46 PM

Jan 2020

dewsgirl

(14,961 posts)

16. 😂

Reply to maxsolomon (Reply #15)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:47 PM

Jan 2020

karynnj

(59,495 posts)

17. First of all if Tribe's comment refers to his arguments - he is agreeing very are bogus

Reply to dewsgirl (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 07:49 PM

Jan 2020

Not to mention, a Harvard Law Professor should know that the correct word is CENSOR not sensor.

dewsgirl

(14,961 posts)

22. I was confused, so I guess he is admitting his arguments are bogus.

Reply to karynnj (Reply #17)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 08:40 PM

Jan 2020

Honestly, I was so baffled by that, that I didn't even notice the misspelling until I posted it here.

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)

18. Here, this video explains it clearly

Reply to dewsgirl (Original post)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 08:10 PM

Jan 2020

PSPS

(13,577 posts)

23. LOL. It could be more succinct, though.

Reply to jberryhill (Reply #18)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 09:33 PM

Jan 2020

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)

24. That WAS the short version

Reply to PSPS (Reply #23)

Mon Jan 20, 2020, 09:35 PM

Jan 2020

You want the extended dance mix.

Reply to this discussion