Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,973 posts)
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 04:53 PM Jan 2020

Army officer says she was raped, but court ruling blocks her from justice

Capt. Erin Scanlon says she doesn't know where to begin.

-snip-

Her ordeal, she says, started on the night of Sept. 10, 2016 when Scanlon, a former fire support officer in the Army's elite 82nd Airborne Division who left the military last month, claimed she was raped by another Army service member in Fayetteville, North Carolina. She was a 1st Lt. at the time of the alleged assault and made Captain in February 2019.

But from there her predicament only worsened: the military took over the case from civilian criminal court a week before trial was set to begin and one of her former special victims counsels, her advocate in the military legal system, was ordered to testify against her about a witness Scanlon didn't disclose until late in the court martial process.

Scanlon says she then wasn't allowed to sit in on the trial or see any transcript and that, now, she has no legal recourse to file a suit against the Army primarily because of a controversial 1950 Supreme Court ruling that prevents service members from suing the government.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/army-officer-says-she-was-raped-but-court-ruling-blocks-her-from-justice/ar-BBZaVIQ?li=BBnb7Kz&ocid=hplocalnews

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Army officer says she was raped, but court ruling blocks her from justice (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Jan 2020 OP
LOOPHOLE found!! bluestarone Jan 2020 #1
The Feres Doctrine is long-established law and not terribly controversial. TomSlick Jan 2020 #2
Yes I do want them to sue the government!!! atreides1 Jan 2020 #3
So, if a soldier dies in combat, his family can sue the Army alleging poor tactical decisions? TomSlick Jan 2020 #4

TomSlick

(11,098 posts)
2. The Feres Doctrine is long-established law and not terribly controversial.
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 11:17 PM
Jan 2020

It really makes sense. Do you really want soldiers suing the government when they are injured in military service?

The facts alleged make for a hard case but we must remember that hard cases make for bad law.

atreides1

(16,079 posts)
3. Yes I do want them to sue the government!!!
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 09:18 AM
Jan 2020

Especially if said injuries were a result of the incompetence of the chain of command!!!

For 13 years I kept hearing that old mantra of being responsible for your actions...I guess it was all bull shit...figures!!!!

TomSlick

(11,098 posts)
4. So, if a soldier dies in combat, his family can sue the Army alleging poor tactical decisions?
Thu Jan 23, 2020, 01:11 AM
Jan 2020

Thus endeth the ability of the country to have a military.

A soldier's life is one of risk. Soldier's accept that risk in service of the country.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Army officer says she was...