Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

stopbush

(24,396 posts)
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 07:48 PM Jan 2020

MSNBC: Claire McCaskill surprised that "Susan" voted against allowing documents

That would be Susan “Don’t Believe For A Fucking Second That She Won’t Vote With tRump 100% Of The Time” Collins, who McCaskill insisted on calling “Susan” all day today.

23 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
MSNBC: Claire McCaskill surprised that "Susan" voted against allowing documents (Original Post) stopbush Jan 2020 OP
Please. guillaumeb Jan 2020 #1
idk... I'm finding her behind-the-scenes knowledge pretty interesting renate Jan 2020 #5
But if she is truly surprised about Collins, guillaumeb Jan 2020 #6
well, yeah, that renate Jan 2020 #11
Her prediction was that Collins, whose reelection is in danger, Hortensis Jan 2020 #12
She is just low balling her comments... FarPoint Jan 2020 #16
I agree Rebl2 Jan 2020 #13
Go watch the Young Turks. Plenty of choices if you don't like it. BannonsLiver Jan 2020 #20
my ex senator simply is stuck in a past that never was. Kurt V. Jan 2020 #2
Yup Sherman A1 Jan 2020 #3
You missed what happened. That panel have no illusions Hortensis Jan 2020 #17
yeah. i don't watch that crap. There's been no good conservative commentary in about 100 Kurt V. Jan 2020 #18
Douthat? :) Oh, come on. Sure you don't like him Hortensis Jan 2020 #21
i can't disagree with this. but when he just does conservative dogma as a philosophy Kurt V. Jan 2020 #22
Not the same thing, but I was just reminded that Hortensis Jan 2020 #23
I think those two had a good working relationship from what I have read. It is hard to riversedge Jan 2020 #4
Please let something happen to Susan "Don't Believe For A Fucking Second That She Won't Vote With t trueblue2007 Jan 2020 #7
I think the "agreement" between Collins and Turtle BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #8
Get real Claire. spanone Jan 2020 #9
Susan received " assurances " from Midnight Mitch calguy Jan 2020 #10
oh okay bdamomma Jan 2020 #14
Anybody who is surprised has not been paying attention... Wounded Bear Jan 2020 #15
I'm glad she did BannonsLiver Jan 2020 #19

renate

(13,776 posts)
5. idk... I'm finding her behind-the-scenes knowledge pretty interesting
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 07:57 PM
Jan 2020

What happens in what room, procedural stuff, etc.

renate

(13,776 posts)
11. well, yeah, that
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 08:14 PM
Jan 2020

I wonder whether Collins either knows that the fix is in and she'll retain her seat, or she's being blackmailed or has been promised something and has just given up on getting reelected. I can't imagine why she keeps doing this Lucy-and-the-football thing without realizing she has become a walking talking joke.

And I can't imagine why anybody with a brain genuinely expects anything better from her. Hope, yes, we can't help that--but we all know she's going to pull a Flake every time she gets our hopes up.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
12. Her prediction was that Collins, whose reelection is in danger,
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 08:19 PM
Jan 2020

would cynically and ostentatiously vote for all the things a principled senator should and then vote to acquit Trump. A repeat of Kavanaugh with McConnell's full approval in order to protect HIS majority power and a typical ploy any time a seat is in danger.

Instead, she's hanging her ass out with all the others who aren't up for reelection, undoubtedly McConnell's decision. They'll all hang together.

I hadn't noticed that some people had a problem with her, but just googled the usual reason and, yup. Oh, boy.

Look, the Republican base should be a big object lesson. They've cut off every information source that doesn't flatter their leaders, to the point that it's a wonder they're not poking out their left eyes in spite. Self-inflicted political insanity might as well be the real thing when no therapists are ever going to ride to the rescue.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
17. You missed what happened. That panel have no illusions
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 09:00 PM
Jan 2020

about what the Republicans have become. But this morning, with the time for each Republican senator to leap over a giant cliff arrived, the panelists had hope that even just a few would balk. This afternoon, they'd lost that spark of hope.

This election isn't about MfA, it's about saving Medicare. Social Security. ACA. Saving the clean air and water laws and fighting climate change. Civil rights, including women's. Children in cages. Eleven million still to be deported, brown citizens caught up in it. And on and on.

This election is not about advancing Sanders' vision but about stopping, or falling to, a far larger and more advanced RW authoritarian revolution.

“If conservatives become convinced that they can not win democratically, they will not abandon conservatism. They will reject democracy.” David Frum

Strong conservatives came to realize they could no longer win democratically and that it would only get worse. This is what's happening.

Kurt V.

(5,624 posts)
18. yeah. i don't watch that crap. There's been no good conservative commentary in about 100
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 09:07 PM
Jan 2020

years or so. with a single exception in douthat.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
21. Douthat? :) Oh, come on. Sure you don't like him
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 10:40 PM
Jan 2020

because he's pushing Bernie Sanders at the left?

You do know that he's a social conservative, right, with sympathies he always hedges for populist antagonisms? Religious right, antigay, antiliberal, probably a number of anti-s it's not cool to admit to, that kind of thing? I wrote him off years ago as one of the many who were selling "clever" dystopian bashing of almost everything as intellectual insights. Selling is the word since there's always a reliable market for that.

But we take the Times, so I can't avoid him completely. Middle age now and too intelligent to just be one of the happy trumpsters a dumber Douthat would, or to admit who he's working to reelect while laundering it through verbose criticism. Make no mistake, though. Keeping power in Republican hands is what the NYT is paying him for and the main reason he writes about Sanders as flatteringly and frequently as he does.

Kurt V.

(5,624 posts)
22. i can't disagree with this. but when he just does conservative dogma as a philosophy
Wed Jan 22, 2020, 08:32 PM
Jan 2020

he's a throw back.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
23. Not the same thing, but I was just reminded that
Thu Jan 23, 2020, 09:13 AM
Jan 2020

back during the Nixon era a professor had us take a pencil like a machete to long political screeds and eliminate almost everything but key words, noun, key adjective, verb, object, that kind of thing. Lol, and what?!! when on one of them a famous "LW" intellectual he'd chosen, when stripped of obfuscation and hedging, turned out to be pushing dishonest Republican political arguments.

If I was sure I remembered right I'd name him, because the person I'm thinking of is still around selling his dystopian, anti-Democratic schtick as LW intellectualism.

Another day of Democrats speaking principle to the nation, while Republican senators are forced to sit and hear it all. Jennifer Rubin says a lot of Republican senators are willfully ignorant (just like our neighbors) and are probably hearing a lot of this evidence for the first time.

riversedge

(70,218 posts)
4. I think those two had a good working relationship from what I have read. It is hard to
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 07:55 PM
Jan 2020

admit sometimes when colleagues go bonkers.

trueblue2007

(17,218 posts)
7. Please let something happen to Susan "Don't Believe For A Fucking Second That She Won't Vote With t
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 07:59 PM
Jan 2020

SEND HER TO THE MOON !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Susan “Don’t Believe For A Fucking Second That She Won’t Vote With Rump 100% Of The Time” Collins, who McCaskill insisted on calling “Susan”

BumRushDaShow

(128,979 posts)
8. I think the "agreement" between Collins and Turtle
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 08:01 PM
Jan 2020

was that they wait to vote for whether to allow witnesses/subpoenas, until AFTER all the opening statements/questions.

So they would supposedly have one more shot to request this. Whether that is successful or not is a big question mark.

bdamomma

(63,849 posts)
14. oh okay
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 08:22 PM
Jan 2020

I guess a donation is in order for Sara Gideon, her opponent. Never trust these repig bastards.

Wounded Bear

(58,656 posts)
15. Anybody who is surprised has not been paying attention...
Tue Jan 21, 2020, 08:23 PM
Jan 2020

Concern Troll Suzie flips and flops like a beached salmon.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»MSNBC: Claire McCaskill s...