Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Roland99

(53,342 posts) Thu Jan 23, 2020, 09:59 AM Jan 2020

So, you run a company. A guy embezzles three times...

Link to tweet

You run a company.
A company accountant is caught embezzling—3 times.
He fires the investigators' boss.
He fires another of their bosses.
He won't answer questions from outside investigators.
He won't show them documents.
It's safe to assume he only embezzled the 3 times.

Right?

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, you run a company. A guy embezzles three times... (Original Post) Roland99 Jan 2020 OP

Not if you're a repugnant Senator BSdetect Jan 2020 #1

Three? More like a hundred and three... FM123 Jan 2020 #2

It's always the server. CaptYossarian Jan 2020 #3

BSdetect

(8,998 posts)

1. Not if you're a repugnant Senator

Reply to Roland99 (Original post)

Thu Jan 23, 2020, 10:14 AM

Jan 2020

FM123

(10,053 posts)

2. Three? More like a hundred and three...

Reply to Roland99 (Original post)

Thu Jan 23, 2020, 10:22 AM

Jan 2020

One question to one person would really clear things up: ask John Bolton what else is on that secret server where they stashed the Ukraine call transcript.

CaptYossarian

(6,448 posts)

3. It's always the server.

Reply to FM123 (Reply #2)

Thu Jan 23, 2020, 11:37 AM

Jan 2020

It was Hillary's server, Scott Walker's server, then Ivanka's server. Now this.

We used to say "The butler did it". Today, it's the server that did it.

In reality, it's the one who possesses the server. He's guilty as hell, perfect calls or not. The 73-year old isn't adult enough to take responsibility for his actions.

Reply to this discussion