Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
177 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
******* Impeachment Live Thread 1 - 1/25 ******* (Original Post) Mersky Jan 2020 OP
Benediction and pledge have occurred Mersky Jan 2020 #1
Cippy is up and not acting like WH Counsel Mersky Jan 2020 #2
Thank you for starting this BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #3
Eh, I want them to know people are watching this farce of a defense Mersky Jan 2020 #8
Had a few more hours of rest but still haven't caught up yet. BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #30
Was super excited to see you in here. Is much appreciated. Mersky Jan 2020 #168
Glad to see you guys too! BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #171
Thanks for the thread and stream links! Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #170
Yeah, it was awful. Mersky Jan 2020 #173
Thank you for doing this today! nt chowder66 Jan 2020 #177
Ditto... I am having trouble even thinking about watching... I'll read the threads for awhile hlthe2b Jan 2020 #17
I was gonna have the volume down low and read the cc BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #32
Aww thank you, Mersky! This will be tough day. ancianita Jan 2020 #4
They will be OBNOXIOUS, but their lies and bs shall be revealed Mersky Jan 2020 #22
Talk about "boring" Cipollone is a real fire cracker isn't he? underpants Jan 2020 #5
He has to talk real slow to try to have them all reach 2 hours. BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #7
I know you were joking but it sounds like you're right underpants Jan 2020 #51
Poop-pura is doing the same thing BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #55
Purpura Backseat Driver Jan 2020 #82
LOL BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #93
Oh, that's where I've heard that name before Mersky Jan 2020 #174
That's who I meant underpants Jan 2020 #84
That was filler material BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #95
I just made this underpants Jan 2020 #145
DUzy! BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #155
I hope you've spread that around. People need laughs! Hermit-The-Prog Jan 2020 #176
WTF is he talking about "burden sharing"? BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #6
I can't remember who it was, but avebury Jan 2020 #37
Exactly (someone posted that in this thread) BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #52
Here you go underpants Jan 2020 #102
That the EU as well as the US helps Ukraine karynnj Jan 2020 #112
Cippy wants to frame this as an ALT-evidence defense AND how dangerous the House is ancianita Jan 2020 #9
Guess what, he's wrong underpants Jan 2020 #20
The only way to smash this drumbeat claim for the next 10 months is make it part of elevator pitch ancianita Jan 2020 #34
So now he is going to use the time to insult our allies? BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #10
Par for the course. Trump does it all the time. Arkansas Granny Jan 2020 #15
... BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #23
LOL... Zoonart Jan 2020 #33
full of shit Kali Jan 2020 #11
they got nuthin ... dweller Jan 2020 #12
But. We had better listen to it in order to disprove it. ancianita Jan 2020 #13
Agreed totally! Will try to listen on the radio and contribute what I can n/t DonaldsRump Jan 2020 #114
The radio's a great way to filter out histrionics, but it also deprives one of body/facial language. ancianita Jan 2020 #117
Oddly I feel I get a better sense of the truth listening to the radio. Arthur_Frain Jan 2020 #156
I hear you. Listening focuses the senses and thinking. ancianita Jan 2020 #160
Stunning indeed malaise Jan 2020 #18
I'm glad someone is watching just not me. dem4decades Jan 2020 #14
I wouldn't miss it. Arkansas Granny Jan 2020 #19
You have a much longer fuse than i. dem4decades Jan 2020 #29
I'm just curious to find out just what it takes to buy the soul of a Republican Senator Arkansas Granny Jan 2020 #41
Not much. dem4decades Jan 2020 #47
Except this and a lot of dark and foreign money. ancianita Jan 2020 #69
In all fairness... MontanaMama Jan 2020 #66
Lol Arkansas Granny Jan 2020 #78
And they certainly don't want to hear that they're cowering cowards either. dem4decades Jan 2020 #79
But it's not easy. Mike 03 Jan 2020 #26
Surprise! WRONG. $16.4 BILLION from Europe to Ukraine since 2014 underpants Jan 2020 #16
+1 Arkansas Granny Jan 2020 #21
The President's side was not locked out you lying sleazeball malaise Jan 2020 #24
This is hard to take. Mike 03 Jan 2020 #28
IT is Dems who are trying to steal the election malaise Jan 2020 #31
Cip is doubling down on a blatant lie. oasis Jan 2020 #39
"They repeat over and over again..." as he says burden sharing live love laugh Jan 2020 #25
Now it's 21 hours. I lost count how many times this guy's said it. underpants Jan 2020 #56
Yeah I heard that shift to 21 hours too. nt live love laugh Jan 2020 #67
Ask yourself, Why haven't I heard this before? underpants Jan 2020 #27
They blocked evidence then claim Democrats don't have it liberal N proud Jan 2020 #35
+1, the judicial system is lacking on this issue. It shouldn't take 123432 years to get a ruling ... uponit7771 Jan 2020 #48
Legal gaslighting is what it's called. ancianita Jan 2020 #81
Tre rebuttal time that is "see article 2 re Obstruction " NotASurfer Jan 2020 #129
"Essence..." superpatriotman Jan 2020 #36
Let the Lies Begin.... spanone Jan 2020 #38
what a moron Kali Jan 2020 #40
lol ... they gonna show Wonderful World Of Gumball next ?! Cause we can't tell that's a cartoon 🙄🙄 uponit7771 Jan 2020 #42
Oh no, they are dredging up Adam Schiff's satirical interpretation of the Mike 03 Jan 2020 #43
Poop-pura played Schiff's clip about the mob shakedown BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #44
I wish Dems had driven this point home. nt live love laugh Jan 2020 #63
I watched the Democrats' presentation gavel to gavel BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #88
Agree. I watched that, too. ancianita Jan 2020 #103
I'm talking about the language itself live love laugh Jan 2020 #118
The full breadth and scope of this argument will be behind the next 10 months of Republican message ancianita Jan 2020 #45
The first two speakers have spoken of the REAL TRANSCRIPT -- but they NEVER gave us a transcript karynnj Jan 2020 #46
I don't think they have the real one either BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #62
If they have a tape, they do - they seem to prefer having their version CALLED a transcript karynnj Jan 2020 #100
From what I understand BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #126
I was under the impression the calls are NOT recorded, DeminPennswoods Jan 2020 #161
They have both the secret server and original transcript in Russian control. ancianita Jan 2020 #115
They are accusing Dems of election interference... Satch59 Jan 2020 #49
So it's all about "TRANSCRIPT TRANSCRIPT TRANSCRIPT", which is a COMPLETE lie, bullwinkle428 Jan 2020 #50
"Burden sharing" underpants Jan 2020 #64
If anyone is using that phrase as part of a drinking game, I hope the ambulance is bullwinkle428 Jan 2020 #70
If the Trumpsters are hearing "bourbon sharing" underpants Jan 2020 #106
pupura cut himself off with the start of playing the first clip of Schiff. Mersky Jan 2020 #53
"might as well tear up the ballots" IggleDuer Jan 2020 #54
'A Basement Bunker' another lyin' MF spanone Jan 2020 #57
The transcript was not released either malaise Jan 2020 #59
Schiff prebutted these two points yesterday. And here they are ANYWAY. ancianita Jan 2020 #86
Facts are stubborn things malaise Jan 2020 #91
I hear you. They've got alt-science and alt-reality and are ready to go all in on the 17th Century. ancianita Jan 2020 #96
So is ignorance - they own that malaise Jan 2020 #101
They disagree.They own "alt-intelligence."Our labels for them roll off authoritarian followers' back ancianita Jan 2020 #107
What is their preoccupation with basements? Arkansas Granny Jan 2020 #119
This is a TERRIBLE legal argument but how many people will Mike 03 Jan 2020 #58
This is a glossy (they think) presentation heard on Fox News underpants Jan 2020 #73
Saturday is the least television-watching day of the week. BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #76
It'll take 1,000s of lawyers' joint deposition to disprove this to millions of this "ALT" mentality ancianita Jan 2020 #113
It only took snowybirdie Jan 2020 #60
+1, they aren't even trying ... f ck it ... they might as well read all of Trumps tweets that would uponit7771 Jan 2020 #65
They're getting paid by the hour C_U_L8R Jan 2020 #72
ah ... got it uponit7771 Jan 2020 #92
Yeah. A check from Trump. underpants Jan 2020 #136
So this is a bunch of Trump talking points that they add details to?! Might as well showed Gumball ! uponit7771 Jan 2020 #61
So he's repeating what Cipollone said 20 minutes ago? underpants Jan 2020 #68
They only taking 2 - 3 hours, what is Monday going to look like ?! uponit7771 Jan 2020 #94
Whoa. Is some lying crap: tRump didn't do an unprecedented thing declassifying the call Mersky Jan 2020 #71
Nancy let him think releasing it would end the whole thing. underpants Jan 2020 #80
Lol. I'd forgotten that Mersky Jan 2020 #99
The press has killed that part of the timeline too underpants Jan 2020 #111
True. And, lol. Mersky Jan 2020 #169
OBAMA. Only took 33 minutes. underpants Jan 2020 #74
We should have had a betting pool on MontanaMama Jan 2020 #85
Got to keep the Fox News crowd happy underpants Jan 2020 #90
So they are going to insist that the transcript deals with corruption even though corruption was Arkansas Granny Jan 2020 #75
Fitting that their graphics are in yellow. 5X Jan 2020 #77
He's reading Adam Schiff's closing summation! robbob Jan 2020 #83
What a bunch of BS - trying to claim that the conversation of 7/25 w/ Zelensky about Pachamama Jan 2020 #87
The Javelins are still in storage underpants Jan 2020 #97
They are still ignoring the "Do us a favor though..." BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #104
Call your senators and tell them you know how false/insulting the republican defense is this morning Mersky Jan 2020 #89
what do the body language readers say about all that tongue thrusting? Kali Jan 2020 #98
Used crushed ritalin like sugar in his morning coffee? Mersky Jan 2020 #109
bet the boss is tripping too Kali Jan 2020 #125
Just had to check on that Mersky Jan 2020 #148
BWAHAHAHA!!! Kali Jan 2020 #165
Oh hey, that's rough. Mersky Jan 2020 #172
I'll bet that all 53 assholes are there . . . Iliyah Jan 2020 #105
Now 53 traitorous self serving assholes are staying in their seats listening and taking notes Pachamama Jan 2020 #110
I'm surprised, they already have their talking points. dem4decades Jan 2020 #127
So do the Democrats, particularly those running for the presidency. ancianita Jan 2020 #163
What does that mean? The Democrats are based on fact, not so much with the Republicans. dem4decades Jan 2020 #166
Oops. Misunderstood your post. Sorry. Now I get it. ancianita Jan 2020 #167
At 5 minutes in my blood was already at the boiling point but I will listen to all of their in2herbs Jan 2020 #108
Okay. Hold it. They're using the "hearsay/no facts" testimonies from Schiff's hearings??? underpants Jan 2020 #116
Of course. They're the originators of those lines. ancianita Jan 2020 #121
Is infuriating: Zeroing-in on Sondland as hearsay Mersky Jan 2020 #122
Power & deals for them, hearsay for Americans. "What you are seeing and reading is not what's happen ancianita Jan 2020 #138
Suckylow up. BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #120
A little dab will do ya underpants Jan 2020 #131
Cippolone is very low energy. Bigly. And now... JohnQFunk Jan 2020 #123
Bottom line Mossfern Jan 2020 #124
Trump had a blanket order IN WRITING underpants Jan 2020 #128
Documents that Democrats have in hand? ancianita Jan 2020 #140
And but for the pResident's obstruction and an attorney general as cleaner Mersky Jan 2020 #130
Now trying out the election interference by Ukraine theory. Arkansas Granny Jan 2020 #132
He called the FBI liars and that they hid information a few minutes ago underpants Jan 2020 #135
According to inspector generals, not so. ancianita Jan 2020 #146
so unoriginal, no creativity. Kali Jan 2020 #133
Suckitup got lost in his own argument there underpants Jan 2020 #134
Who was he talking about? I heard Laura Crap, then I heard Laura Cooper a little further Mersky Jan 2020 #137
I had to figure out Borysenko too. nolabear Jan 2020 #144
listening to suckitup dweller Jan 2020 #139
+1, they might as well just read Trump tweets ... they make more sense and that says something uponit7771 Jan 2020 #142
I'm having difficulty Mossfern Jan 2020 #141
Is the 'throw it at the wall and see what sticks' defense Mersky Jan 2020 #153
Okay I just got here (West Coast). WTF is Sekulow on about? nolabear Jan 2020 #143
It seems to have been like this Mossfern Jan 2020 #147
El Salvador? Lebanon? OIC. It was a BUSINESS deal! nolabear Jan 2020 #149
Oh we just got a Biden reference underpants Jan 2020 #150
Bwah! Mersky Jan 2020 #175
TBH, the WH lawyers are doing enough to give DeminPennswoods Jan 2020 #151
Sekulow is all over the place. madaboutharry Jan 2020 #152
"Only one President....Since 2014...has taken effective steps" underpants Jan 2020 #154
President Obama was president in 2014. madaboutharry Jan 2020 #159
He's done his completely offtopic nonsenical argument - now to Pat Philbin BumRushDaShow Jan 2020 #157
When do they bring on Whackadoodle Jordan C_U_L8R Jan 2020 #158
Hey hey hey underpants Jan 2020 #164
****** LIVE THREAD 2 is UP ******* Mersky Jan 2020 #162

Mersky

(4,979 posts)
2. Cippy is up and not acting like WH Counsel
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:09 AM
Jan 2020

Complaining about the amount of time taken by the House manangers

BumRushDaShow

(128,441 posts)
3. Thank you for starting this
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:09 AM
Jan 2020

I just couldn't including because it's THEM



(at least Cippycup acknowledged that they barely had about 2 - 3 hours of a case )

Mersky

(4,979 posts)
8. Eh, I want them to know people are watching this farce of a defense
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:13 AM
Jan 2020

In THEIR kangaroo court

Hi, BRDS! Hope you got some goooood rest!

Hermit-The-Prog

(33,250 posts)
170. Thanks for the thread and stream links!
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:18 PM
Jan 2020

I'm debating with myself whether to watch, or just read here.

Mersky

(4,979 posts)
173. Yeah, it was awful.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:24 PM
Jan 2020

A downer kind of circus with half-inflated balloons and dodgy clowns.

At least that’s over til Monday.

BumRushDaShow

(128,441 posts)
32. I was gonna have the volume down low and read the cc
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:19 AM
Jan 2020

but wanted to confirm that all they had was talking points.

Mersky

(4,979 posts)
22. They will be OBNOXIOUS, but their lies and bs shall be revealed
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:17 AM
Jan 2020

On DU is a start to revealing their ineptitude and complicity

___
You’re so very welcome. Thanks for sharing the load - and it will be a load.

underpants

(182,603 posts)
51. I know you were joking but it sounds like you're right
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:25 AM
Jan 2020

This guy is taking looooong pauses like he’s waiting for someone with the rest of report to get there.

Backseat Driver

(4,380 posts)
82. Purpura
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:35 AM
Jan 2020
https://www.healthline.com/health/purpura

Bad rash "Purpura, also called blood spots or skin hemorrhages, refers to purple-colored spots that are most recognizable on the skin. The spots may also appear on organs or mucous membranes, including the membranes on the inside of the mouth. Purpura occurs when small blood vessels burst, causing blood to pool under the skin.

https://www.healthline.com/health/purpura#pictures

underpants

(182,603 posts)
84. That's who I meant
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:36 AM
Jan 2020

He has also repeated what Cipollone said.

Burden sharing. That’s their big phrase.

avebury

(10,951 posts)
37. I can't remember who it was, but
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:20 AM
Jan 2020

somebody on MSNBC had said that the EU has actually done far more for Ukraine than the US.

BumRushDaShow

(128,441 posts)
52. Exactly (someone posted that in this thread)
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:25 AM
Jan 2020

I think that statement about Germany, etc came from that call readout (that they keep calling a "transcript" ) - and it was completely uninformed.

underpants

(182,603 posts)
102. Here you go
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:44 AM
Jan 2020
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/13/factcheck-trump-wrong-european-aid-ukraine/4178935002/

President Donald Trump wrongly said that “Europe and other nations” were “not” contributing to Ukraine, specifically calling for Germany and France to “put up money.” In fact, the European Union and European financial institutions have contributed more than $16.4 billion in grants and loans to Ukraine since 2014.

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
112. That the EU as well as the US helps Ukraine
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:49 AM
Jan 2020

They are claiming that we did more on the sanctions. In the Obama years, it WAS Obama, Biden and Kerry who fought for strong sanctions that were harder for our allies than us because they have more trade - especially fuel - from Russia.

However, Trump ignored Congress when it added sanctions on Russia in 2017 and was against them when they passed both houses of Congress. To have the chutzpah to argue that they did more on sanctions than EU is absolutely disingenuous.

ancianita

(35,932 posts)
9. Cippy wants to frame this as an ALT-evidence defense AND how dangerous the House is
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:13 AM
Jan 2020

and how "dire the consequences to America forever and forever" is what the House is doing.

Get ready to unpack the ALT legal, and its ALT arguments.

First up, Germany and how it just talks and never does anything.

underpants

(182,603 posts)
20. Guess what, he's wrong
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:16 AM
Jan 2020
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/13/factcheck-trump-wrong-european-aid-ukraine/4178935002/

President Donald Trump wrongly said that “Europe and other nations” were “not” contributing to Ukraine, specifically calling for Germany and France to “put up money.” In fact, the European Union and European financial institutions have contributed more than $16.4 billion in grants and loans to Ukraine since 2014.

ancianita

(35,932 posts)
34. The only way to smash this drumbeat claim for the next 10 months is make it part of elevator pitch
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:20 AM
Jan 2020

politics.

Thanks for the first demolishment of the bullshit. We have to keep it up.

dweller

(23,613 posts)
12. they got nuthin ...
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:14 AM
Jan 2020

it's all the Democrats fault, trying to change the results of an election, to remove fatnixon from the ballot ... blah fn blah

NO DEFENSE AT ALL !

useless 😡

✌🏼

ancianita

(35,932 posts)
117. The radio's a great way to filter out histrionics, but it also deprives one of body/facial language.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:52 AM
Jan 2020

underpants

(182,603 posts)
16. Surprise! WRONG. $16.4 BILLION from Europe to Ukraine since 2014
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:15 AM
Jan 2020

President Donald Trump wrongly said that “Europe and other nations” were “not” contributing to Ukraine, specifically calling for Germany and France to “put up money.” In fact, the European Union and European financial institutions have contributed more than $16.4 billion in grants and loans to Ukraine since 2014.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/13/factcheck-trump-wrong-european-aid-ukraine/4178935002/

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
48. +1, the judicial system is lacking on this issue. It shouldn't take 123432 years to get a ruling ...
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:24 AM
Jan 2020

... during an official impeachment process when the president proffers utter stupidity like Red Don has done.

NotASurfer

(2,146 posts)
129. Tre rebuttal time that is "see article 2 re Obstruction "
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:05 PM
Jan 2020

And maybe "thank you for helping to make the point on the Obstruction article"

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
42. lol ... they gonna show Wonderful World Of Gumball next ?! Cause we can't tell that's a cartoon 🙄🙄
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:22 AM
Jan 2020

BumRushDaShow

(128,441 posts)
44. Poop-pura played Schiff's clip about the mob shakedown
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:23 AM
Jan 2020

and it WAS a shake down. They can't possible dispute that.

They apparently had no idea that the House Managers were going to use almost 24 hours of time to actually introduce evidence so they figured they didn't have to "prepare".

And what they are calling a "transcript" is not a "transcript" - it's a highly edited "readout/call memo".

BumRushDaShow

(128,441 posts)
88. I watched the Democrats' presentation gavel to gavel
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:37 AM
Jan 2020

and it WAS driven home. In every which way they could. That put the GOP on the defensive to somehow try to refute the mob-like atmosphere given all the mentions of Ghouliani and his shady role along with Parnas and Furman and all the other mob "associates". And now that call audio is out there with Drumpf yelling "take her out".

live love laugh

(13,079 posts)
118. I'm talking about the language itself
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:56 AM
Jan 2020

In one fell swoop they are back to “the transcript”. I’m only saying that every time they mentioned the “readout” it would have helped to add some thing like “...which was not an actual transcript”...

ancianita

(35,932 posts)
45. The full breadth and scope of this argument will be behind the next 10 months of Republican message
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:23 AM
Jan 2020

We have to dismantle it, point by point.

This isn't mere groundling cult thinking; it's formulated all the way up to the federal level.

This has to be addressed as at least part of the Democrats' election messaging.

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
46. The first two speakers have spoken of the REAL TRANSCRIPT -- but they NEVER gave us a transcript
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:23 AM
Jan 2020

A transcript would have every word said - unless they were redacted. What we got was a Trump administration put out were their version of meeting notes. The length of them would not have covered the full time.

BumRushDaShow

(128,441 posts)
62. I don't think they have the real one either
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:28 AM
Jan 2020

otherwise they would have distributed it far and wide if it exonerated him.

karynnj

(59,498 posts)
100. If they have a tape, they do - they seem to prefer having their version CALLED a transcript
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:44 AM
Jan 2020

I think they are trying very hard to convince at least those who might vote Republican that the case was rigged by the Democrats. To do this, they are cherry picking their own created meeting notes. It tells me they are somewhat aware that the Democratic case was compelling because calling something a transcript - when it absolutely is not - and then using that it was a transcript to argue that it itself is the true record.

The even bigger thing they are doing is burying the many months of acting against the ambassador. The current speaker even rehabilitated the corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor that the EU, US et al wanted out, praising him as good. Both of them are arguing that Trump did more than Europe and Obama respectively.

I think the reason for their relatively short time is because - as they said - the burden of proof is on the Democrats. It seems like they are not even trying to prove anything - just to create doubt enough to allow Republicans to say that it is "unclear" or "not certain" that Trump did anything wrong.

Knowing that they control if Trump is ousted - and he won't be, there entire goal is to convince the public of two things - Trump did nothing wrong here and the Democrats are doing this for political reasons because they hate Trump.

BumRushDaShow

(128,441 posts)
126. From what I understand
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:03 PM
Jan 2020

(and although I obviously don't work in the WH but did work in a federal agency) the "recordings" are usually digital. And the issue in this case was that the recording file was "moved" to a highly classified "server" (probably a special encrypted cloud space) and an electronic copy of what was transcribed (which had to include translations between the parties) was stored there as well. I think Vindman had testified that he had seen the raw translated transcript and he along with others on their NS team (as part of a group effort) recommended additions/subtractions/modifications - probably doing it with M$ Word and its "track changes" feature). Once someone above them "approved" the changes, it was apparently redistributed to the team and I think that's when Vindman said he noticed that his edits were not included.

So what eventually got released was basically a "redacted" (without the traditional "redaction" blackout) of the call - where there were ellipses throughout it indicating gaps of conversations.

And regarding everything else - there is nothing they can "bury". Their talking points have been debunked in the media and yes, all they can do is try to sow "doubt" in the Democrats' case. But there was so much in the case (to the point where people were whining about it being "repetitive and boring", that attempts to sow doubt can never reach every piece of evidence that was presented.

And agree that what you said is their goal but it seems every day, more and more comes out to completely blow them away.

DeminPennswoods

(15,265 posts)
161. I was under the impression the calls are NOT recorded,
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:29 PM
Jan 2020

(at least on the US end) but there are a bunch of people listening in and taking notes. Then a "transcript" is written and passed around for comments, additions, etc. Vindman said the things he suggested adding/changing were not used.

Satch59

(1,353 posts)
49. They are accusing Dems of election interference...
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:24 AM
Jan 2020

That’s rich... defies logic that they can prove he did nothing wrong...will be comical.

bullwinkle428

(20,628 posts)
50. So it's all about "TRANSCRIPT TRANSCRIPT TRANSCRIPT", which is a COMPLETE lie,
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:24 AM
Jan 2020

as no one outside of Chumpworld has seen the actual transcript; only a summary of the call. Which in and of itself, is indicting.

bullwinkle428

(20,628 posts)
70. If anyone is using that phrase as part of a drinking game, I hope the ambulance is
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:31 AM
Jan 2020

waiting right outside their door!

underpants

(182,603 posts)
106. If the Trumpsters are hearing "bourbon sharing"
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:46 AM
Jan 2020

There’s going to a long line at the package stores when they open.

Mersky

(4,979 posts)
53. pupura cut himself off with the start of playing the first clip of Schiff.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:25 AM
Jan 2020

And will use the word “fake” as cover for his lack of preparedness. He doesn’t really need to be prepared when tRump has blocked all cooperation of witnesses. Thank goodness some of the witnesses defied tRump’s orders and appeared for testimony.

IggleDuer

(964 posts)
54. "might as well tear up the ballots"
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:25 AM
Jan 2020

The ballots are already printed out? Whose name is on the ballots? Has the Democratic nominee already been decided? Sounds like the Repubicans have already rigged the election.

malaise

(268,693 posts)
91. Facts are stubborn things
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:39 AM
Jan 2020

By the way, I'm just learning that you can have two completely different sets of facts. I guess they really believe this alternative facts shit.

ancianita

(35,932 posts)
96. I hear you. They've got alt-science and alt-reality and are ready to go all in on the 17th Century.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:42 AM
Jan 2020

All that winning and making America great.

The fascist reality -- religion, law, science, culture and all the 'isms' that go with them -- is strong with this group.

ancianita

(35,932 posts)
107. They disagree.They own "alt-intelligence."Our labels for them roll off authoritarian followers' back
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:46 AM
Jan 2020

s

Arkansas Granny

(31,506 posts)
119. What is their preoccupation with basements?
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:56 AM
Jan 2020

Didn't they make a big deal out of Hillary's server being in the basement? They also claimed she was operating a child sex ring out of the basement of a pizza joint.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
58. This is a TERRIBLE legal argument but how many people will
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:26 AM
Jan 2020

realize how bad it is?

It's an 'absence-of-evidence' argument. He's pointing out what didn't happen instead of admitting what did happen.

underpants

(182,603 posts)
73. This is a glossy (they think) presentation heard on Fox News
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:32 AM
Jan 2020

Uh Oh OBAMA!!!!

Only took 33 minutes

BumRushDaShow

(128,441 posts)
76. Saturday is the least television-watching day of the week.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:33 AM
Jan 2020

I expect that even most of their base aren't watching because that kind expects that their "leaders" will "take care of it" for them.

ancianita

(35,932 posts)
113. It'll take 1,000s of lawyers' joint deposition to disprove this to millions of this "ALT" mentality
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:50 AM
Jan 2020

We're in lawyers wars.

Only those who can out-argue these guys can change this hyperrationalizing mindset in the halls of power. Because, right now, it dominates, however it's seen outside the White House or beltway.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
65. +1, they aren't even trying ... f ck it ... they might as well read all of Trumps tweets that would
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:29 AM
Jan 2020

... be better spent time.

uponit7771

(90,301 posts)
61. So this is a bunch of Trump talking points that they add details to?! Might as well showed Gumball !
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:28 AM
Jan 2020

underpants

(182,603 posts)
68. So he's repeating what Cipollone said 20 minutes ago?
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:30 AM
Jan 2020

I will repost this

President Donald Trump wrongly said that “Europe and other nations” were “not” contributing to Ukraine, specifically calling for Germany and France to “put up money.” In fact, the European Union and European financial institutions have contributed more than $16.4 billion in grants and loans to Ukraine since 2014.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2019/11/13/factcheck-trump-wrong-european-aid-ukraine/4178935002/

Mersky

(4,979 posts)
71. Whoa. Is some lying crap: tRump didn't do an unprecedented thing declassifying the call
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:31 AM
Jan 2020

The only reason the call was declassified was because he got caught - and it was improperly classified to begin with! NSC legal counsel, Eisenberg, copped to Morrison that it was a mistake.

underpants

(182,603 posts)
80. Nancy let him think releasing it would end the whole thing.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:34 AM
Jan 2020

She didn’t say anything of the kind from what we know but Trump convinced himself that she did.

Self played!!!

Mersky

(4,979 posts)
99. Lol. I'd forgotten that
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:44 AM
Jan 2020

Was shrewd.

But then pupura just had to use his tone to say that tRump did us a grand favor. Was like a parent commending a kid for removing his fork from his brother’s leg and just letting the one bleed. The fork shouldn’t have been in his leg in the first place and take care of the bleeder, dammit!

MontanaMama

(23,295 posts)
85. We should have had a betting pool on
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:36 AM
Jan 2020

how long it would take. I’m kinda surprised it look 33 minutes.

Arkansas Granny

(31,506 posts)
75. So they are going to insist that the transcript deals with corruption even though corruption was
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:33 AM
Jan 2020

never mentioned.

robbob

(3,522 posts)
83. He's reading Adam Schiff's closing summation!
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:36 AM
Jan 2020

It’s like he took bullet point crib notes from last nights closing summation! “And then they’re going to tell you the President wasn’t given an opportunity to defend himself...”.

Luckily for tRump the GOPeers have already forgotten all the evidence from the last 3 days, including the closing summation, and weren’t really listening anyway, since they already know how they’re going to vote.

Pachamama

(16,884 posts)
87. What a bunch of BS - trying to claim that the conversation of 7/25 w/ Zelensky about
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:37 AM
Jan 2020

...assistance with Javelins prove that it wasn’t about the withholding of military assistance.

Guess they are forgetting to mention that the Ukrainians got the Javelins with the conditions they actually couldn’t use them on tanks. And that shortly after Trump had the military assistance frozen.

Wow - they are sleazy liars.

https://www.businessinsider.de/international/republicans-leaving-out-key-detail-trump-javelin-sale-to-ukraine-2019-11/?r=US&IR=T

https://crooksandliars.com/2019/11/us-requires-ukraine-keep-javelins-100s

underpants

(182,603 posts)
97. The Javelins are still in storage
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:43 AM
Jan 2020

There is a level of security required and the Ukraine can’t meet those standards.

It’s a requirement of the manufacturer and so we don’t pay for weapons that end up in enemy hands.

BumRushDaShow

(128,441 posts)
104. They are still ignoring the "Do us a favor though..."
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:44 AM
Jan 2020

THAT was the take-away of that call. :

(but that is too damaging and they have nothing to refute it except to cherry-pick people who were clueless as to what was going on)

Mersky

(4,979 posts)
89. Call your senators and tell them you know how false/insulting the republican defense is this morning
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:37 AM
Jan 2020

And we’re just 35 minutes in!

Mersky

(4,979 posts)
109. Used crushed ritalin like sugar in his morning coffee?
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:48 AM
Jan 2020

Is speedy - careening through his barrage of garbage

Mersky

(4,979 posts)
148. Just had to check on that
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:19 PM
Jan 2020

He’s been relatively quiet, BUT he retweeted live coverage of the opening arguments and then deleted it! Ha. Hahahahaha.

Kali

(55,003 posts)
165. BWAHAHAHA!!!
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:34 PM
Jan 2020


I got the first hour, gotta go to a real funeral now. will catch the recording or threads later. have fun!

Mersky

(4,979 posts)
172. Oh hey, that's rough.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 01:19 PM
Jan 2020

I give you my sympathies (not sure I could handle such today), and hope you’re real kind to yourself as best you can this weekend.

Thanks for being in here this morning.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
105. I'll bet that all 53 assholes are there . . .
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:45 AM
Jan 2020

I'll also bet that the Democrats are silently laughing. . .

in2herbs

(2,944 posts)
108. At 5 minutes in my blood was already at the boiling point but I will listen to all of their
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:46 AM
Jan 2020

lies if for no other reason than its historical importance. Haven't viewed Rachel's show from last night but I wonder if it will be in any discussion today.

underpants

(182,603 posts)
116. Okay. Hold it. They're using the "hearsay/no facts" testimonies from Schiff's hearings???
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:51 AM
Jan 2020

The right wing has been saying this for a month. Now THEY are using THAT testimony in their defense?!?!

Mersky

(4,979 posts)
122. Is infuriating: Zeroing-in on Sondland as hearsay
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:58 AM
Jan 2020

Never mind the texts, never mind the other fact witnesses, like Taylor and Hill’s calling Sondland as being on a “domestic political errand.”

Never mind that BOLTON comes up across much of their links to the scheme and he should be SUBPOENAED to appear in the Senate trial*

ancianita

(35,932 posts)
138. Power & deals for them, hearsay for Americans. "What you are seeing and reading is not what's happen
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:14 PM
Jan 2020

ing

JohnQFunk

(408 posts)
123. Cippolone is very low energy. Bigly. And now...
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 11:58 AM
Jan 2020

Sekulow is going to whip out "Crossfire Hurricane" like a severed head from a duffel bag.

Mossfern

(2,449 posts)
124. Bottom line
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:00 PM
Jan 2020

The White House produced no documents and subpoenas were not responded to.

Cherry picking from the Muller report.

underpants

(182,603 posts)
128. Trump had a blanket order IN WRITING
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:05 PM
Jan 2020

and specifically sent additional letters to 6 people to ignore subpoenas

Mersky

(4,979 posts)
130. And but for the pResident's obstruction and an attorney general as cleaner
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:05 PM
Jan 2020

The Mueller report might have had real teeth.

As Schiff said last night you can’t have Article I, without Article II. Meaning you can’t get to bottom of abuses of power/crimes when the offender in question can block the investigators.

ancianita

(35,932 posts)
146. According to inspector generals, not so.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:18 PM
Jan 2020

Continuing to impugn the greatest standing law enforcement body is treason, except when you want to end law enforcement in a nation of law, in order to force into existence a nation of men -- loyalists like these fake lawyers.

dweller

(23,613 posts)
139. listening to suckitup
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:15 PM
Jan 2020

and i have this image of a pinball careening around in his brain ...
is there a valid point there?
cause i don't get it ..

✌🏼

Mersky

(4,979 posts)
153. Is the 'throw it at the wall and see what sticks' defense
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:24 PM
Jan 2020

So, I’m right there with you. It’s a salad of potential talking points.

nolabear

(41,932 posts)
143. Okay I just got here (West Coast). WTF is Sekulow on about?
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:16 PM
Jan 2020

I’ve heard Carter Page, FISA, Ukraine corruption...is this the right room?

Has it all been like this?

nolabear

(41,932 posts)
149. El Salvador? Lebanon? OIC. It was a BUSINESS deal!
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:20 PM
Jan 2020

Are they going to use this excuse? Of course they are.

underpants

(182,603 posts)
150. Oh we just got a Biden reference
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:21 PM
Jan 2020

Yes it's been a mess. They are using the "hearsay/no facts" testimonies from the Schiff hearings as part of their defense. At least the second guy did.

Suckitup is going full conspiracy theory.

Oh and "burden sharing"

DeminPennswoods

(15,265 posts)
151. TBH, the WH lawyers are doing enough to give
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:23 PM
Jan 2020

cover to the R senators who plan to vote not to convict Trump and those who want to believe Trump.

I'm kind of surprised the WH lawyers are actually trying to present a semblence of a defense and not just galloping off on CTs and other craziness.

madaboutharry

(40,190 posts)
152. Sekulow is all over the place.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:23 PM
Jan 2020

It seems like he is reading off an outline of talking points rather than a well crafted legal argument.

Listing instances of holds on foreign aid is a false argument. Foreign aid can be held back for legitimate reasons, but not for the personal and political benefit of the president.



underpants

(182,603 posts)
154. "Only one President....Since 2014...has taken effective steps"
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:24 PM
Jan 2020

Uh, how many Presidents have there BEEN since 2014?

madaboutharry

(40,190 posts)
159. President Obama was president in 2014.
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:28 PM
Jan 2020

So I guess it was just a way of making a gratuitous slight against Obama.

C_U_L8R

(44,987 posts)
158. When do they bring on Whackadoodle Jordan
Sat Jan 25, 2020, 12:28 PM
Jan 2020

and Alan Underpants Dershowitz?
I'm hankering some Saturday morning cartoon.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»******* Impeachment Live ...