General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMulvaney issues a statement
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mulvaney's lawyer has issued a statement on Bolton's book. h/t <a href="https://twitter.com/meridithmcgraw?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@meridithmcgraw</a> <a href="https://t.co/bTWlNHb8gX">pic.twitter.com/bTWlNHb8gX</a></p> Natasha Bertrand (@NatashaBertrand) <a href="
Link to tweet
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 27, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
MontanaMama
(23,378 posts)Wonder why?
global1
(25,328 posts)jayschool2013
(2,325 posts)C_U_L8R
(45,055 posts)They're going down.
kentuck
(111,111 posts)Covering his ass.
nolabear
(42,022 posts)Phoenix61
(17,041 posts)come down to this. If you apply enough pressure to a bunch of sniveling cowards they always turn in each other.
MoonlitKnight
(1,584 posts)For further waiving privilege.
bluestarone
(17,220 posts)No recollection!
11 Bravo
(23,928 posts)Put them both under oath. What do you say, Mick?
Midnight Writer
(21,952 posts)Of course, in GOP Land, testifying under oath is by definition a "perjury trap".
Submariner
(12,526 posts)[link:
|happybird
(4,705 posts)Perfect.
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)Roland99
(53,342 posts)UNDER OATH
Sunsky
(1,737 posts)chowder66
(9,136 posts)lindysalsagal
(20,847 posts)When the gangster's shit-bombs start exploding, the scum will run for cover. And it will be a stampede.
struggle4progress
(118,379 posts)Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)Of course, they won't do that because Micky's lame version of events would be blown out of the water.
Johonny
(21,041 posts)so ... ah ... there's that counter argument.