General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMulvaney issues a statement
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Mulvaney's lawyer has issued a statement on Bolton's book. h/t <a href="https://twitter.com/meridithmcgraw?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@meridithmcgraw</a> <a href="https://t.co/bTWlNHb8gX">pic.twitter.com/bTWlNHb8gX</a></p> Natasha Bertrand (@NatashaBertrand) <a href="
Link to tweet
?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 27, 2020</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
MontanaMama
(24,644 posts)Wonder why?
global1
(26,468 posts)jayschool2013
(2,611 posts)
C_U_L8R
(49,117 posts)They're going down.
kentuck
(115,279 posts)Covering his ass.
nolabear
(43,850 posts)Phoenix61
(18,769 posts)come down to this. If you apply enough pressure to a bunch of sniveling cowards they always turn in each other.
MoonlitKnight
(1,585 posts)For further waiving privilege.
bluestarone
(21,636 posts)No recollection!
11 Bravo
(24,292 posts)Put them both under oath. What do you say, Mick?
Midnight Writer
(25,206 posts)Of course, in GOP Land, testifying under oath is by definition a "perjury trap".
Submariner
(13,281 posts)happybird
(5,381 posts)Perfect.
Frustratedlady
(16,254 posts)Roland99
(53,345 posts)UNDER OATH
Sunsky
(1,876 posts)chowder66
(11,995 posts)lindysalsagal
(22,840 posts)When the gangster's shit-bombs start exploding, the scum will run for cover. And it will be a stampede.
struggle4progress
(125,682 posts)Still In Wisconsin
(4,450 posts)Of course, they won't do that because Micky's lame version of events would be blown out of the water.
Johonny
(25,752 posts)so ... ah ... there's that counter argument.
