General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI'm trying to follow what Starr is saying. Not connecting with me.
My mind goes blank. It wanders.
EarlG
(23,633 posts)and nothing to say.
Ilsa
(64,372 posts)#coverup * football ** cough *rape
Watchfoxheadexplodes
(3,542 posts)Bloviating Collins and crazy goober gohmert.
CrispyQ
(40,970 posts)calimary
(90,021 posts)Gasping for breath after every phrase. Painful. Wonder what kinds of heart meds hes on?
dchill
(42,660 posts)I think.
Politicub
(12,328 posts)He keeps droning on about how impeachment is more about time than high crimes.
I would argue that impeachment should be invoked when it is appropriate, like when a president is abusing his office and committing a high crime such as asking a foreign power to intervene in an election. Indeed, the house would be derelict in its duty if it did not act as a check on a president who is out of control and destroying our government.
So it's not the number of impeachments over a period of time. Each impeachment should be looked at individually, since there isn't a cadence of high crimes that must be reached in order to broach impeachment. It's ridiculous to think that a president could abuse his office, get impeached, and then get followed by an even more destructive president who is somehow immune to impeachment because his predecessor was impeached.
Watchfoxheadexplodes
(3,542 posts)That's where he's going.
catbyte
(39,154 posts)EndlessWire
(8,103 posts)I don't like his purple tie.
My TV is cutting in and out, and it doesn't seem to make any difference in his monologue.
Vinnie From Indy
(10,820 posts)He was boring and rambling.