Luke Skywalker has spoken.....

[Heartstrings]

[leftieNanner]

1. Oh! I would pay SERIOUSLY good money to witness that!! nt

[handmade34]

2. a sample...

[paleotn]

3. And you can't argue with Luke.

He's a Jedi for gosh sake's!

[Beartracks]

4. Yes. Please. It will be a perfect testimony.

[mgardener]

9. No, I think you mean...

It will be the best lies by the most "stable genius".

[crickets]

5. Love it. K&R

[Haggis for Breakfast]

6. NEVER UNDERESTIMATE THE HYPOCRISY OF REPUBLICANS.

[smb]

7. Check Out Mark Hamill's Readings Of Trump Tweets In His Joker Voice

Audioboom page here.

[captain queeg]

12. Wow. Thanks

[Lucky Luciano]

8. Tell fuckface it would get the best ratings.

[sandensea]

10. The sense of irony is STRONG in this one.

[PandoraAwakened]

11. K&R! n/t

[jberryhill]

13. Clinton was not forced to testify in his impeachment proceeding

Unfortunately, while Mr. Hamil may be a talented actor, a constitutional historian he is not.

Clinton testified:

1. In a deposition in the Paula Jones civil case, and

2. Before a grand jury convened by Independent Counsel Ken Starr, under an Independent Counsel law which was allowed to expire in 1999 - during the Clinton administration itself.

But, no, Clinton was not forced to testify during his impeachment, so it is a tremendously uninformed question with a false factual premise.

[DonaldsRump]

14. All of these were part of the Clinton impeachment record

He most certainly was forced to testify PRIOR to impeachment, but his answers were used as the basis for his impeachment.

Totally unlike Trump.

[jberryhill]

15. The statement remains false

He was not forced to testify in the impeachment proceeding.

That’s an exceedingly simple and obvious fact.

I identified the two proceedings in which he was required to testify - the civil suit and in an IC investigation under a law which no longer exists.

[AncientGeezer]

16. He may have spoken but he's incorrect about what he "spoke".

[malaise]

17. This is th question of questions

Kick

[AtheistCrusader]

18. The right can't allow it. He's a loose cannon.

They can't control him at all, and he can't control himself.

[CaptYossarian]

19. What would Trump say under "Oath"?

He's violated his initial Oath in each of the thousand days he's been in the Oafish Office. 16,000 damn lies later and here we are.

[Baitball Blogger]

20. I think the most promising development is that woman who is looking for DNA from Trump.

She could follow Paula Jone's private lawsuit track.