Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

napi21

(45,806 posts)
1. Maybe I'm just dumb, but I believe Roberts WANTS to stay out of politics as much as possible.
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 09:07 PM
Jan 2020

Even on the court, he tries to keep the appearance of impartiality. Remember he arhued with DT that we do NOT have Dem & Rep judges, we have Justices on the court!

 

UniteFightBack

(8,231 posts)
7. That's exactly right..the 'appearance' of impartiality...when he's really not. This is all
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 10:18 PM
Jan 2020

orchestrated.

DeminPennswoods

(15,286 posts)
5. I think that's an overreaction
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 10:14 PM
Jan 2020

Roberts' rationale for not being a deciding vote was based on the two votes CJ Chase made for adjournment and some other administrative issue, not on substantive issues.

Remember, the Supreme Court has cases involving executive privilege and seperation of powers that will be coming before it. He can't allow himself to be painted as partisan by one party or the other or possibly be in the position where he might have to recuse himself from participating. Remaining strictly neutral is the right call in this case.

Volaris

(10,270 posts)
6. Or, they were legit terrified that he would do the right thing n was out of their control.
Fri Jan 31, 2020, 10:18 PM
Jan 2020

So Yertle made damn sure not to have to ask him to be A Good Man.

I give Chris the benefit of the doubt, tho.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chris Hayes on Justice Ro...