Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Roberts' voluntary impotence
should serve to remind us of why he got the job.
Hint: Florida 2000
.
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Roberts' voluntary impotence (Original Post)
madamesilverspurs
Jan 2020
OP
jimfields33
(19,382 posts)1. Bush appointed him
SCantiGOP
(14,680 posts)2. The political and jurisprudence issues
behind how he has behaved are sound. He is not a trial judge.
One of my best friends is a flaming activist liberal and a Constitutional Law professor, and he says that Roberts has acted properly, the way we would hope a Chief Justice would act if it were a Democratic President being tried in the Senate.
Karadeniz
(24,731 posts)3. Lawrence O'Donnell was just talking about how Roberts did overstep his neutrality. He let
Mitch to take an unapproved hour off to get his caucus in line. He decided not to read Rand Paul 's question.