General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTakket
(21,552 posts)then yes, there is now legal precedent that this is a legitimate defense.
Hint: Don't try it. It only applies to Kings.
MineralMan
(146,284 posts)Really, anyone CAN rob a bank. It's a bad idea, though, since there is a very good chance you will be caught and go to prison.
Every bank has banks of cameras recording everything that happens. If you rob one, you're likely to get caught these days.
cilla4progress
(24,724 posts)Rule of law is DEAD!
Along with decency, truth, and honor.
Ohiogal
(31,962 posts)Said El Chapo is furious that he didnt have a trial with no witnesses. Said he didnt know it was a thing in America. If I had a trial without those pesky witnesses I wouldnt be sitting in this prison cell.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)And your trial won't be in the Repuke-Majority Senate ...
Personally I'd advise against it given those circumstances.
2naSalit
(86,509 posts)like the idea that you won't kill anyone if they just hand over the money so you can be on your way.
CloudWatcher
(1,846 posts)... and only if you have shared the loot with at least 51 of the Senators.
And ... it helps if you are an old white guy. Otherwise you might not live long enough to see a trial.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,295 posts)so yeah, pick your favourite capitalist, rob them, and tell them the prez says it's OK.
lame54
(35,281 posts)world wide wally
(21,740 posts)The precedent has been set
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)I don't see why not.
dalton99a
(81,432 posts)Captain Zero
(6,799 posts)The cops who caught you going out the door with a bag of money can't be witnesses.
The BAG of Money can't be evidence.
LakeArenal
(28,813 posts)Now if you were stealing the money from say... Social Security, food stamps or infrastructure youd be golden.
42bambi
(1,753 posts)ooky
(8,921 posts)The President of the United States?