Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Dennis Donovan

(24,302 posts)
2. Not sure of the actual tests, but this was in the NYT piece yesterday about a potential pandemic:
Mon Feb 3, 2020, 10:33 AM
Feb 2020
Wuhan Coronavirus Looks Increasingly Like a Pandemic, Experts Say

<snip>

It’s unclear exactly how accurate tests done in overwhelmed Chinese laboratories are. On the one hand, Chinese state media have reported test kit shortages and processing bottlenecks, which could produce an undercount.

But Dr. Lipkin said he knew of one lab running 5,000 samples a day, which might produce some false-positive results, inflating the count. “You can’t possibly do quality control at that rate,” he said.

</snip>

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
5. Fortunately not exactly critical to patient care, since
Mon Feb 3, 2020, 10:53 AM
Feb 2020

that's currently limited to treating symptoms. Though desirable for prognosis of disease course, etc.

I remember that during a big influenza A outbreak, because of long lab delays, eventually lab-based diagnosis was typically dispensed with, again the results mostly irrelevant to clinicians in outbreak areas who recognized the patterns and of course immediately started treating symptomatically.

I also remember that, before that in another outbreak, all the clinicians whose reports I edited, most of my clients in California at that time, suddenly started diagnosing "viral illness." That held true even when lab-confirmed diagnoses were in the chart, so I assumed they were directed o to avoid "over-alarming" the public.

Claritie Pixie

(2,199 posts)
3. Definitive diagnosis by PCR (polymerase chain reaction) lab test.
Mon Feb 3, 2020, 10:37 AM
Feb 2020

This test analyzes viral DNA or RNA from blood or other body fluids, done in a test tube, take about 4 hours for results.

In the US, only the CDC can do this to diagnose the 2019-nCoV.

Claritie Pixie

(2,199 posts)
8. Chest x-rays show areas of congestion/pneumonia. They can't tell you the reason why.
Mon Feb 3, 2020, 02:20 PM
Feb 2020

The only way to detect that the virus is present in the body is through PCR.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would some pathologist ex...