General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI know it's not always right to generalize
But can anyone name a repub who is not a total piece of shit?
Mitt and Evan McMullin seem about the best there is.
Freedomofspeech
(4,223 posts)Not one that I can think of.
RhodeIslandOne
(5,042 posts)If Trump farted in his direction he'd be there to bathe in it.
Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)The worst of the worst perhaps even?
Aristus
(66,328 posts)n/t
Pacifist Patriot
(24,653 posts)crickets
(25,969 posts)hlthe2b
(102,238 posts)Do I forget or forgive them their past enabling and in some cases, dirty trick campaigns to get less obnoxious (than Trump) R's elected? Hell no.
That said, they are not speaking out without personal cost. I salute them for that... the Rick Wilsons, the Steve Schmidts, the Nicole Wallaces, and yes, with significant lingering skepticism, the George Conways of the world.
There is a spectrum and no I don't forget where their core beliefs/principals come into direct conflict with our own.
brokephibroke
(1,883 posts)He has to be normal..
safeinOhio
(32,674 posts)I know a few locally that hate it now too
Brother Mythos
(1,442 posts)Sorry, but I'm going to need more time to think about this before I answer the question.
brokephibroke
(1,883 posts)There are not too many...
Brother Mythos
(1,442 posts)Last edited Mon Feb 3, 2020, 08:19 PM - Edit history (1)
I just can't seem to differentiate between "total piece of shit," and "plain, ordinary piece of shit."
Tracer
(2,769 posts)A decent guy, even tho he's nominally a Republican.
brokephibroke
(1,883 posts)abqtommy
(14,118 posts)flames. He's a total scumbag and I ain't referring to Devin Nunes' cow...
Rider3
(919 posts)Bill Weld wasn't a bad governor.
JHB
(37,159 posts)...Millicent Fenwick, Jacob Javitz...
I'm sure you can detect the obvious theme here.
I'll include Romney... George, that is, not his Trump-enabling son.
Caliman73
(11,736 posts)I am sure you can find Republicans who are half-way decent or who are at least, not complete monsters. The problem is, what do they support? What is the end goal of Republican thought. What do they want to achieve as their stated goals and as what we know of them historically and in today's context.
We know that they have thrown in their support for a person who is completely corrupt and who has shown no loyalty to the actual country of the United States while putting out an image of America that is anathema to its stated values.
Republicans seem to thrive in authority, and conformity. They talk about freedom but they prefer order and would likely choose order rather than freedom so long as the order follows their ideals. They like to say that liberals are "imposing" or more likely "shoving our beliefs down their throats". The funny thing is that liberals tend to advocate for the expression of certain ideas and and conservative for others. Each side wants to have their ideas respected, however liberal ideas tend to be more inclusive while conservative ideas more exclusive.
A liberal would likely say that you can be Muslim, Christian, Buddhist, etc... just don't try to impose particular practices on me or on society. A conservative would complain that having to respect the different aspects of those other religions was a threat to their freedom to express themselves.
That is a fundamental difference. Now, a particular Republican may be more or less open to the idea of tolerance but they support a platform that promotes the dominance of one religious view over all others.
There are likely a lot of Republicans who are decent people, but their ideology leads to what we have right now with Trump.
llmart
(15,536 posts)You mean the Mitt who put his dog on top of the family car? The Mitt who bullied schoolmates at his upper crust prep school?
brokephibroke
(1,883 posts)I wont defend that, but lately he has been the only vaguely reasonable voice the gop has.
brokephibroke
(1,883 posts)madinmaryland
(64,931 posts)brokephibroke
(1,883 posts)dustyscamp
(2,224 posts)elleng
(130,895 posts)'I believe the president, and in the president.
I believe the Senate is right to acquit the president. I believe a fair trial is one with no witnesses, and that the trial was therefore fair. I believe the House was unfair because it found evidence against him. I believe that if the president does something that he believes will get himself reelected, thats in the public interest and cant be the kind of thing that results in impeachment.
I believe former national security adviser John Bolton has no relevant testimony because he didnt leave the White House on good terms.'
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/02/05/george-conway-trump-i-believe/?itid=pm_pop
????
dustyscamp
(2,224 posts)elleng
(130,895 posts)Response to elleng (Reply #26)
dustyscamp This message was self-deleted by its author.
Laura PourMeADrink
(42,770 posts)jcmaine72
(1,773 posts)He's a Democrat now, have you heard? All past sins are now forgiven, even the one's he didn't apologize for.
demtenjeep
(31,997 posts)for ever and neither will my husband or children
never ever
RussBLib
(9,008 posts)Left the GOP and voted for impeachment
Skittles
(153,160 posts)fuck them all