General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe answer from Tom Cotton to my email about witnesses and documents
at the Senate trial.
On July 25, 2019, President Trump spoke over the phone with Ukraines newly-elected President, Volodymyr Zelensky. After the call, someone within the intelligence community who was not on the call filed a whistleblower complaint against the president. According to reports, the whistleblower coordinated with the staff of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman, Adam Schiff, staff before filing the complaint. After the whistleblower complaint was filed, Democratic Party leaders in the House of Representatives used it to justify opening an impeachment inquiry.
Despite an unprecedented act of transparency by President Trump in releasing the transcript of his call with the Ukrainian leader, the Democratic Party nevertheless plunged headlong into a rushed and partisan impeachment process, the conclusion of which seemed predetermined from the start. They ignored precedent, gave no due process rights to President Trump to defend himself against the accusations, and refused to provide Republicans in Congress with the authority to call their own witnesses. The Democratic Party claimed it was necessary to rush the impeachment because it was an urgent matter, yet then they chose not to even send the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate for trial for four long weeks.
The House Democrats then sought to plunge the Senate into a months-long fishing expedition by asking it to finish the Houses work for it and subpoena witnesses that the House never bothered to pursue. It is clear that that the impeachment effort against President Trump has been nothing more than a political exercise by the Democrats in the House, with no regard for truth and with the obvious purpose of leaving a cloud hanging over President Trump while distracting from our work on behalf of the American people. It is a shame that the Democratic Party chose not to dedicate even a fraction of this legislative energy to improving the lives of hardworking Americans instead.
Im honored to serve as your senator. You, your family, and our state will remain on my mind and close to my heart in my work. Always feel free to call my office at (202) 224-2353 or visit www.cotton.senate.gov . Be sure to drop by my office and say hello if you ever visit our nations capital.
Sincerely,
Tom Cotton
United States Senator
Ohiogal
(31,989 posts)Cotton is a disgrace.
Not to be picking on Arkansas .... we have Rob Portman as our very own disgrace here in Ohio....
Arkansas Granny
(31,516 posts)Last I heard, over 400 House bills were languishing in the Senate because McConnell won't bring them to the floor.
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)bdamomma
(63,846 posts)the American people??? Senator. Give me a break while the House has a mountain of bills on the desk of Moscow Mitch! And he's not doing a effing thing for the American people, he's just changing rules and doing Putin's work.
kentuck
(111,089 posts)They wanted the Senate to do its job. Try the impeachment from the House.
crickets
(25,969 posts)mountain grammy
(26,620 posts)Good riddance to him soon enough.
Arkansas Granny
(31,516 posts)mountain grammy
(26,620 posts)But its Arkansas. Sad 😞
dchill
(38,484 posts)Sincerely,
Tom Cotton
United States Senator"
(Edited for relevance.)
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Thank you for your response to my inquiry. Unfortunately, it appears you have several facts quite in error, which you should correct. As you should know, the whistleblower is required by law to report first to the National Security Agency and to the chairs of Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and the House Intelligence Committee. This is precisely the procedure the whistleblower followed, which can hardly be described as "coordinating" with anyone. Why neither the NSA or SSCI did anything with the whistleblower's report, a citizen can only speculate.
Second, the "transcript" of Trump's call that was released was not, by its own terms, a transcript. It was a memorandum of the call, and you should know that any actual transcript has been locked away by the President under the highest security classification. That is hardly transparent, and I highly doubt you would describe similar conduct by a political opponent as such.
Third, the months-long fishing expedition appears to have hooked any number of fish, the details of which have been corroborated by numerous witnesses, including Ambassador Yovanovitch and Lieutenant Colonel Vindman. Any disregard for the truth has been the sole province of the Senate, which has refused to consider any of the evidence brought forward by the House, and has refused to conduct an actual trial of those facts. As you should know, a trial is supposed to have a presentation of evidence and testimony, which the majority of the Senate - including you - have refused to call or consider. Your cursory dismissal of the evidence before you shows your efforts to be nothing more than a sham, a gross dereliction of your duty under the Constitution, and a violation of the oath you swore to render impartial justice.
Shame on you.
spanone
(135,830 posts)struggle4progress
(118,282 posts)pandr32
(11,581 posts)crickets
(25,969 posts)sinkingfeeling
(51,454 posts)P.S. I got the exact same reply.
Arkansas Granny
(31,516 posts)librechik
(30,674 posts)you cotton pickin liar!
lark
(23,097 posts)So, after all the lies, basically he part of the right wing destruction of our constitution = on the behalf of Russia and their tool drumpf & worldwide oligarchs.
Mr. Ected
(9,670 posts)For any reason whatsoever.
Midnight Writer
(21,753 posts)superpatriotman
(6,247 posts)And don't try to fix stupid
Arkansas Granny
(31,516 posts)from time to time, how I feel about matters.