General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGallup Poll has Trump at 49%.
Last edited Tue Feb 4, 2020, 03:02 PM - Edit history (1)
The highest since his election.
This country is fucked.
Source: Just heard on CNN
kentuck
(111,078 posts)Is it an outlier?
Or are we really that far up shit creek?
SamKnause
(13,091 posts)If I had to guess I would say we are buried in the shit creek.
This is so disheartening to people who are informed, watch all the hearings,
watch all the debates, and all the town halls.
I just don't know what to say or think anymore.
Johonny
(20,830 posts)so, probably an outlier. His negatives are through the roof.
Arthur_Frain
(1,849 posts)People said HRC was a shoo in. The only people his negatives are through the roof for are us.
Apparently theres 49% of the poll thats just fine with all this. Thats something to think about.
Johonny
(20,830 posts)Recent polling results show, even among Republicans, he has huge negatives. This doesn't mean Republican voters won't vote for him. But it does suggest, no one really likes him. He has strong negatives. He's unlikely to pick up support outside his base.
SuprstitionAintthWay
(386 posts)Grasswire2
(13,565 posts)They poll older people with landlines.
scarytomcat
(1,706 posts)Reality will set in the more he talks
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Has half the nation gone insane?
SamKnause
(13,091 posts)One half of the nation.
This is so sad and frightening.
underpants
(182,758 posts)Gallup twists itself to get good numbers for Republicans
Baitball Blogger
(46,699 posts)These polls mean absolutely nothing unless the pollsters tell us how many people did you call, what party affiliation were they, and did you know their profile and likely answer before you dialed?
Locutusofborg
(525 posts)Results are based on telephone interviews conducted January 16-29, 2020 with a random sample of 1,033 adults, ages 18+, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on this sample of national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.
For results based on the sample of -- 946 -- registered voters, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.
For results based on the sample of -- 443 -- Democrats and Democratic leaning independents, the margin of sampling error is ±6 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.
For results based on the sample of -- 527 -- Republicans and Republican leaning independents, the margin of sampling error is ±5 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.
Interviews are conducted with respondents on landline telephones and cellular phones, with interviews conducted in Spanish for respondents who are primarily Spanish-speaking. Each sample of national adults includes a minimum quota of 70% cell phone respondents and 30% landline respondents, with additional minimum quotas by time zone within region. Landline and cell phone telephone numbers are selected using random digit dial methods. Gallup obtained sample for this study from Dynata. Landline respondents are chosen at random within each household on the basis of which member has the next birthday.
Samples are weighted to correct for unequal selection probability, non-response, and double coverage of landline and cell users in the two sampling frames. They are also weighted to match the national demographics of gender, age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, education, region, population density, and phone status (cell phone- only/landline only/both and cell phone mostly). Demographic weighting targets are based on the March 2019 Current Population Survey figures for the aged 18 and older U.S. population. Phone status targets are based on the July-December 2018 National Health Interview Survey. Population density targets are based on the 2010 census. All reported margins of sampling error include the computed design effects for weighting.
In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls. For questions about how this survey was conducted, please contact galluphelp@gallup.com. _______________________________________________________________________________
LiberalFighter
(50,867 posts)They used a sample of 443 for Democratic and Democrat leaning
vs.
527 for Republican and Republican leaning
and
why would the margin of error be different for each of them?
Don't forget this part of the above.
In addition to sampling error, question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of public opinion polls.
struggle4progress
(118,274 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts).
Gallup hits mostly landlines, that get older people who watch the SOTU and most can't spot Trump's BS.
.
marmar
(77,072 posts)Means zilch right now.
pwb
(11,259 posts)Maybe lower.
TheCowsCameHome
(40,168 posts)🤣
JaneQPublic
(7,113 posts)Plus, it has a GOP-leaning bias.
Long ago, Gallup was considered the gold standard, but no more.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/
LiberalFighter
(50,867 posts)Iliyah
(25,111 posts)polled - 527 Rs
443 Ds
Thanks!
That helps to explain it.
Vogon_Glory
(9,117 posts)Hawaii Hiker
(3,165 posts)The sample had 527 Republicans and 443 Democrats
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Hawaii Hiker
(3,165 posts)"Results are based on telephone interviews conducted January 16-29, 2020 with a random sample of 1,033
adults, ages 18+, living in all 50 U.S. states and the District of Columbia. For results based on this sample of
national adults, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.
For results based on the sample of -- 946 -- registered voters, the margin of sampling error is ±4 percentage
points at the 95% confidence level.
For results based on the sample of -- 443 -- Democrats and Democratic leaning independents, the margin of
sampling error is ±6 percentage points at the 95% confidence level.
For results based on the sample of -- 527 -- Republicans and Republican leaning independents, the margin of
sampling error is ±5 percentage points at the 95% confidence levell".
file:///C:/Users/Rich/Downloads/200204Political%20(1).pdf
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Repubs are 54% of the sample, but only 49% of the sample approve.
Grasswire2
(13,565 posts)they don't include that tidbit
lapfog_1
(29,199 posts)and I haven't had a landline in nearly 10 years.
Grasswire2
(13,565 posts)People with landlines.
Wednesdays
(17,342 posts)Polling only people with telephones.
We all remember President Landon, don't we?
grantcart
(53,061 posts)One is approval which skews higher for Trump, in the high 40s
The other is support for reelection which is consistently at 42%.
You can pick apart the poll if you want but the depressing reality is that he shouldn't be over 25% in any rational universe.
Whether it is 49% or 44% it shoes that this country is
1) intellectually lazy
2) prone to fear based on racist and xenophobic scare tactics
3) Have little understanding of macro economics
4) etc
This isn't going to can be in the near future.
boston bean
(36,221 posts)LiberalFighter
(50,867 posts)Plus, I've been saying that Republican have been dying off at a greater rate than Democrats. Why do I say that? Because the older folks tend to be more conservative.
0rganism
(23,937 posts)as they say,
"Samples are weighted to correct for unequal selection probability, non-response, and double coverage of landline and cell users in the two sampling frames. They are also weighted to match the national demographics of gender, age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, education, region, population density, and phone status (cell phone- only/landline only/both and cell phone mostly). Demographic weighting targets are based on the March 2019 Current Population Survey figures for the aged 18 and older U.S. population. Phone status targets are based on the July-December 2018 National Health Interview Survey. Population density targets are based on the 2010 census. All reported margins of sampling error include the computed design effects for weighting."
handling unequal and even unrepresentative sub-populations is standard operating procedure for professional pollsters.
the main effects of under-sampling Democrats will be increased inaccuracies in secondary calculations based on unions and intersections of Democratic responders relative to the Republican sample.
i highly recommend referencing an aggregation site like https://fivethirtyeight.com/ this poll could easily be an outlier, but not because their samples were uneven.
LiberalFighter
(50,867 posts)rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,323 posts)marmar
(77,072 posts).... because he is so disliked.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)for working people. Referring to it as if it's just one thing is simply misleading.
TheRealNorth
(9,475 posts)That will hoodwink some people.
The Chambers of Commerce are even getting more creative with their advertising - businessea are building messaging about a "strong economy" into their regular ads.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)if your wages are stagnant while the Chamber of Commerce is gloating in your face about how rich they are becoming; you won't be hoodwinked. You'll be massively pissed off.
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)"Working people" care a great deal about the number of people working... and the wages involved.
There are reasonable responses that can be made, but the numbers imply that "economy" is also doing quite well.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)since Trump took office.
So I sure hope you are correct when you say '"Working people" care a great deal about the number of people working... and the wages involved.'
https://www.frbatlanta.org/chcs/wage-growth-tracker.aspx
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)Not sure which chart youre looking at. All that shows on my phone is 12-month data and it doesnt match your description.
Heres data from the same source over multiple years.
https://www.frbatlanta.org/blogs/macroblog/2019/12/16/faster-wage-growth-for-the-lowest-paid-workers
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)...for only the lowest-paid workers. The chart I linked to clearly shows that for workers as a whole, wages suddenly stagnated after Trump took office. Not sure why it's not showing up on your screen; it is very clear on my screen.
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)The Y axis is not an absolute figure... it's a rate of growth. Wages didn't "stagnate"... they grew at roughly the same rate as the highest of the prior eight years. So the rate of growth did not accelerate (though the latest data refutes that)... but that's not at all the same thing as claiming that wages stagnated.
More importantly... in a total reversal from the prior period. The lowest quartile population saw wages grow at a faster pace than wages in general (and at close to the highest rates of the last couple decades).
This matches the prose of the link that I sent (which makes sense because it's the same source).
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)Which, of course, were in direct opposition (probably intentional defiance) to Republican policies.
FBaggins
(26,727 posts)There are over 150 million employed in the country with only about half a million of them earning the federal minimum wage. The bottom quartile is far too large for that to explain the difference.
More importantly... you would have to have a reason to believe that state efforts in this area were more substantial over the last three years than the previous period for the claim to be relevant.
We dont have to believe that republican policies should get credit for the gains... but cant pretend that they dont exist (or that it could impact the election)
tman
(983 posts)That won't decide the election.
marmar
(77,072 posts)rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,323 posts)Drunken Irishman
(34,857 posts)It's why he's viable and within striking distance of winning against any Dem running right now.
If the economy was in the tank, he'd be far worse off.
It's true Trump isn't getting the same bounce from the economy as a normal president would get but I think he's still getting support. He certainly isn't at Nixon levels in approval.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Butterflylady
(3,542 posts)When we don't even know who our nominee will be yet.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,323 posts)Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)Everyone here prefers to look at Trump as an exception. That's why there has been such preposterous confidence that he would be forced out of office, or resign from office, or be impeached, or not renominated.
That is the nonsensical view that attaches when someone obsesses over daily details or breathlessly waits for Rachel Maddow every night.
I have emphasized since 2017 that Trump is not an exception. All of the benefits of incumbency are going to fully apply. You described the situation perfectly.
This is the same thing I experienced while living in Las Vegas for 24 years and betting sports. The gamblers who watched every game and allowed waves of new variables to influence their subjective opinion every day had absolutely no chance. The ones who relaxed and applied a wide scope spotlight knew what to anticipate.
I feel genuinely sorry for anyone who opinion is in the balance every day.
Grammy23
(5,810 posts)We are told that up is down. Black is white. Just deal with it and shut up. We watch the Democrats do a hellava job trying to present facts and evidence with facts and evidence being withheld. And STILL, they did an amazing job of burying tRump with what he did. The Republican response was to casually walk away saying No Big Deal.
I just dont even know what to say any more. It gets harder and harder to believe that truth will win out, that right will prevail. Moving out of this stinker of a place gets more appealing by the day. But where? The unrest and upheaval is everywhere.
It feels like were in the middle of a novel that promises a climactic end. So many possibilities. I still cling to this idea that our Constitution will save us, even knowing we have people actively working to stop that from happening.
Im tired of the drama and uncertainty and I know that is what tRump, Putin and others are counting on. They are hoping more and more of us will just relent and stop fighting. I am a stubborn cuss, so for now they wont make me knuckle under. But damn it....it is hard. My dad, who died in 1967, is spinning in his grave. 😢
whathehell
(29,065 posts)I could say more, Granny, but right now, it seems too depressing. Thanks for your excellent post, though.. I'm also a Boomer and your sentiments equal mine. :
NoMoreRepugs
(9,408 posts)individuals of course Rump is going to get good numbers. Doesnt take a rocket scientist or another poll to figure that out.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)That being said the economy is buoying Trump and as long as Americans believe it's good it will continue to buoy Trump.
democratisphere
(17,235 posts)electable candidate. Joe Biden.
She_Totally_Gets_It
(142 posts)we are done!
gab13by13
(21,299 posts)Gallup years ago used to be reliable but when it plugged in bogus data for the 2008 election they exposed that they are corrupt.
I laugh at this poll.
Phoenix61
(17,000 posts)Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)People freak out over individual polls.
Heres a tip: dont read individual polls at all. Just follow the averages.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)Loki Liesmith
(4,602 posts)About 1 in 20 polls is going to show an anomalous result though. This is in line with that probability.
Life is just too short to let the noise in the system affect our mood. In the end we will win or we will lose. Anybody here planning on quitting the fight if we lose? I dont think many are.
Trust yourself and your team.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I am trying to adopt a Zen like approach to politics but Trump is singularly awful.
rockfordfile
(8,701 posts)They lost that years ago.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)I'm not a fan but that has no bearing on how the media presents them.
Vogon_Glory
(9,117 posts)Theres still the better part of nine months until voting starts.
Donnie has shown time and time again that he is an agent of chaos and disruption. He does NOT have it all under control.
Claritie Pixie
(2,199 posts)dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)MoMof6
(16 posts)I would not dismiss these poll results so flippantly.
Gallup has been around a long time. If the results were favoring us, history shows we would be trumpeting them.
Nonetheless, the standout result to me in this latest poll is the change in the Trump approval rating from Independents > up 5% to 42%. We all know these people are the swing voters that will decide the next election. We have to figure out why we are losing them...and figure it out quick.
If this trend continues it will not matter who the Dem nominee is....
Vogon_Glory
(9,117 posts)Its not 2016. Donnies novelty has worn off. Democrats are far angrier and less complacent than they were four years ago. And Donnie still has months more to be seen screwing up at home and abroad.
Cletus and Lulabell cant carry Orange Julius over the finish line all by themselves.
Way too early for all this drama about a snapshot approval rating poll. Makes you wonder......
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)Trump is at 43% on 538
denem
(11,045 posts)They are even better than Gall Up
GeorgeGist
(25,319 posts)andym
(5,443 posts)and enough are willing to give him a pass because of the economy to re-elect him. It's been the nightmare scenario for a while.
Awsi Dooger
(14,565 posts)Trump inherited an Obama economy that was strengthening. His crude behavior was always going to be absorbed. Now it's going to be shocking when we don't have a president who lashes out every day.
Still Sensible
(2,870 posts)around 3-5% tilted conservative. Real number is probably 44-46%, which is still a terrible statement on the politics of the USA!
Grasswire2
(13,565 posts)I wouldn't worry about that.
Older people with landlines.
jayfish
(10,039 posts)Hmm... Who could it have been?
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100212933443
videohead5
(2,171 posts)They way oversampled Republicans. There are more Registered Democrats than Republicans.
Bradical79
(4,490 posts)As of now, Gallup's recent poll is an outlier.
And Gallup's polls usually are outliers - on the GOPee side.
Midnight Writer
(21,743 posts)I get between 5 and 20 robocalls a day, so I have stopped answering.
A couple of times a day I look through the caller ID and if I recognize the caller, I call them back.
Surely I am not alone in this. It makes me wonder how that affects the sampling for polls.
octoberlib
(14,971 posts)videohead5
(2,171 posts)They oversampled Republicans.
sandensea
(21,621 posts)Gallup is notoriously GOP-leaning - like a Rasmussen-lite.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)sandensea
(21,621 posts)Looks like they were trying to goose Cheetolini's speech.
Didn't work.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)to every old person you ever talk to.
Make memes for FB. Post videos. They are winning the propaganda race.
JudyM
(29,225 posts)Generic Other
(28,979 posts)JudyM
(29,225 posts)Threw down some thoughts there, hopefully others will too!
bdamomma
(63,836 posts)want a dictator????
Who is that 49%????
or is Russian propaganda, some one has to fill the void of Rush now.
JustAnotherGen
(31,810 posts)They've gotten it wrong when it really matters.
My assumption is we are losing the WH, the Senate, and House - and I intend to prevent that from happening.
Let's fight like we are half way through the knock out count.
OliverQ
(3,363 posts)Vogon_Glory
(9,117 posts)Yogi Berra was right. I see no reason to even think of turning the ccountry over to the Trumpies until after Election Day.
Aristus
(66,316 posts)n/t
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Greybnk48
(10,167 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)It is that these Polls are barely worth the paper they are printed on.
HelpImSurrounded
(441 posts)In particular, look at how Trump's ratings compare to every president back to Truman. His ratings are abysmal.