Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Demovictory9

(32,448 posts)
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 03:43 AM Feb 2020

So, you hate socialism, ya say?





Sergio Siano
@SergioJSiano
So, you hate socialism, ya say?

If you make $50,000/year, $36 of your taxes goes to food stamps. $4,000 goes to corporate subsidies.

If the $36 upsets you more than the $4,000, then you just hate poor people - not socialism.
4:21 PM · Feb 14, 2020·Twitter for iPhone
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So, you hate socialism, ya say? (Original Post) Demovictory9 Feb 2020 OP
So sad TEB Feb 2020 #1
Oh we've got socialism alright in this country it's called Corporate Welfare ! YOHABLO Feb 2020 #2
+1 Why do we subsidize the oil industry when they make bucket loads of money? nt mitch96 Feb 2020 #27
I am an FDR Democrat and what I hate pnwmom Feb 2020 #3
Yes, and most of this comes down to corruption, and the lack of OnDoutside Feb 2020 #4
Linguists will say the meaning of words change over time. i think this is an example 👆 Kurt V. Feb 2020 #5
The definition hasn't changed in the current dictionary. pnwmom Feb 2020 #6
Nobody is running to a dictionary when the word socialism is used. ppl already have a positive, Kurt V. Feb 2020 #9
It is self-defeating to brand ourselves with a controversial label pnwmom Feb 2020 #10
We can't run from every "controversial label" just because it is a "controversial label" ck4829 Feb 2020 #11
We should reject it because it's false and self-defeating. The type of government Bernie espouses pnwmom Feb 2020 #14
I agree, it's indeed false and only leads to defeat Hav Feb 2020 #16
i don't want the party branded as socialism any more than you do. but republicans have been doing it Kurt V. Feb 2020 #12
It doesn't soften the blow AT ALL. It turns the Democratic party into an echo chamber pnwmom Feb 2020 #15
i should have explained the point of the link. Sorry about that. Kurt V. Feb 2020 #13
Yes, words and their meanings do change over time! We can roll with it and be part of the process or ck4829 Feb 2020 #17
The party of the Democratic Socialists of America uses the same old definition as before. pnwmom Feb 2020 #22
Yes FDR was not a socialist, Progressive dog Feb 2020 #20
. And the Nordic countries are well-regulated capitalist countries, not socialist. mitch96 Feb 2020 #28
Oh, I've described a system wherein everybody puts money into a pot Warpy Feb 2020 #7
I used to do something similar when I was in the States during the Bush days. DFW Feb 2020 #8
Ha! So true Joinfortmill Feb 2020 #18
I want my tax return to include the list of things that I want to pay taxes for Fresh_Start Feb 2020 #19
Food stamps are not socialism. Progressive dog Feb 2020 #21
Many people moondust Feb 2020 #24
If every thing the government does is socialism, Progressive dog Feb 2020 #32
food stamps are a-ok to these folks Nature Man Feb 2020 #30
When did Bernie adopt the label moondust Feb 2020 #23
Sanders has been calling himself a "socialist" for decades. brush Feb 2020 #26
+1. n/t pnwmom Feb 2020 #29
Oh. moondust Feb 2020 #31
k&r BSdetect Feb 2020 #25

pnwmom

(108,975 posts)
3. I am an FDR Democrat and what I hate
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 04:36 AM
Feb 2020

is the thought that Trump could win because some of us are determined to brand our party with the word "socialist."

FDR was a wealthy capitalist, not a socialist. And the Nordic countries are well-regulated capitalist countries, not socialist.

pnwmom

(108,975 posts)
6. The definition hasn't changed in the current dictionary.
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 05:21 AM
Feb 2020

And it hasn't changed in the general population -- just the segment of voters who have swallowed Bernie's new definition.

It also hasn't changed in the party of the Democratic Socialists of America.

And the part of the population most likely to vote (older voters) will always associate "socialist" with the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, and the Nazi Party (National Socialist German Workers Party.) Why alienate millions of older voters for no good reason?

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/socialism

Definition of socialism
1: any of various economic and political theories advocating collective or governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods
2a: a system of society or group living in which there is no private property

b: a system or condition of society in which the means of production are owned and controlled by the state
3: a stage of society in Marxist theory transitional between capitalism and communism and distinguished by unequal distribution of goods and pay according to work done

https://www.dsausa.org/about-us/what-is-democratic-socialism/

Today, corporate executives who answer only to themselves and a few wealthy stockholders make basic economic decisions affecting millions of people. Resources are used to make money for capitalists rather than to meet human needs. We believe that the workers and consumers who are affected by economic institutions should own and control them.

Social ownership could take many forms, such as worker-owned cooperatives or publicly owned enterprises managed by workers and consumer representatives. Democratic socialists favor as much decentralization as possible. While the large concentrations of capital in industries such as energy and steel may necessitate some form of state ownership, many consumer-goods industries might be best run as cooperatives.

Kurt V.

(5,624 posts)
9. Nobody is running to a dictionary when the word socialism is used. ppl already have a positive,
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 05:58 AM
Feb 2020

Negative or neutral opinion. if you're alienated by it, so be it but its not on purpose. Its simply an attempt to show how absurd some aspects of the word is. and lastly. ..
https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2019/04/behind-2018-united-states-midterm-election-turnout.html

pnwmom

(108,975 posts)
10. It is self-defeating to brand ourselves with a controversial label
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 06:20 AM
Feb 2020

that isn't even accurate.

Bernie has made it clear that he admires the well-regulated capitalism practiced in the Nordic countries. They aren't socialists, they're Social Democrats and capitalists.

I'm not sure what point you were getting at with your link to turnout information. Few the new D members of the House identified as socialists.

ck4829

(35,045 posts)
11. We can't run from every "controversial label" just because it is a "controversial label"
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 06:27 AM
Feb 2020

These same people who made "socialist" a controversial label have also made or are also trying to make "empathy", "liberal", "feminist", "multicultural", "pro-choice", "anti-fascist", "anti-racist", etc. controversial labels as well.

Should we run away from them too?

If "Doesn't want to throw virgins into volcanoes to appease the Dow and Blessed Job Creators" became controversial five years from now, should we run away from that?

It's time to start standing up and resisting the right-wing, it's time to declare that they are not gods who define our words for us.

pnwmom

(108,975 posts)
14. We should reject it because it's false and self-defeating. The type of government Bernie espouses
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 06:38 AM
Feb 2020

are those of the Nordic countries, and they're examples of well-regulated capitalism, not socialism. As he has said, he's an FDR Democrat. FDR was a capitalist, not a socialist.

It's dumb for any Democrat to claim the label that was associated with the Soviet Union, the Nazis, Cuba, North Korea, etc., and which carries a great deal of negative baggage for the majority of Americans.

Hav

(5,969 posts)
16. I agree, it's indeed false and only leads to defeat
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 07:17 AM
Feb 2020

It feels as if the label Democratic socialism was only made up in a poor attempt to cover for the fact that Bernie described himself as a socialist. They know the US will not vote for a socialist so they believed they could soften it by putting Democratic in front of it and falsely attributing the same label to other countries that aren't even close to socialism. It's amazing his base just buys whatever is sold even if it makes no sense.

And I also don't agree with the weak talking point that the Repubs always ran portraying Dems as socialists. Surely wasn't the case with Hillary. But in Bernie's case they wouldn't even need to lie. They have a video of him and they don't have anything close to that for the other candidates.

Kurt V.

(5,624 posts)
12. i don't want the party branded as socialism any more than you do. but republicans have been doing it
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 06:27 AM
Feb 2020

Forever. why not soften the blow? the link shows young voter turnout has skyrocketed.

pnwmom

(108,975 posts)
15. It doesn't soften the blow AT ALL. It turns the Democratic party into an echo chamber
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 06:41 AM
Feb 2020

of the R's slur.

And there are many reasons for the increase in young voter turnout -- for example, concerns about climate change.

ck4829

(35,045 posts)
17. Yes, words and their meanings do change over time! We can roll with it and be part of the process or
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 09:22 AM
Feb 2020

We can be manipulated by those that already do this...

As usual, though, we are supposed to kowtow to the right-wing's definitions of socialism... things like you know, not being a sociopath when it comes to employment, buying things before a blizzard, not wanting to get shot in school, and more.

Apparently, we're supposed to be rolled over and let them do the defining for us.

pnwmom

(108,975 posts)
22. The party of the Democratic Socialists of America uses the same old definition as before.
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 11:12 PM
Feb 2020

A small fraction of the country might think they have redefined it, but even the party uses the conventional definition.

We believe that the workers and consumers who are affected by economic institutions should own and control them.

Social ownership could take many forms, such as worker-owned cooperatives or publicly owned enterprises managed by workers and consumer representatives. Democratic socialists favor as much decentralization as possible. While the large concentrations of capital in industries such as energy and steel may necessitate some form of state ownership, many consumer-goods industries might be best run as cooperatives.


https://www.dsausa.org/about-us/what-is-democratic-socialism/#govt

Progressive dog

(6,900 posts)
20. Yes FDR was not a socialist,
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 11:03 PM
Feb 2020

and the real socialist countries were places like the USSR and China when it was starving. N Korea is still fully socialist and Cuba mostly socialist. Venezuela is giving socialism a try.
We shouldn't imitate those nations.

mitch96

(13,890 posts)
28. . And the Nordic countries are well-regulated capitalist countries, not socialist.
Sun Feb 16, 2020, 10:48 AM
Feb 2020

They are some of the most "happiest" countries in the world also.. I think Forbes or USA today did a piece on countries that are pleasant to live in. Norway/Sweden/Denmark/Holland were right up there.. Taxed out the ass and "no worries mate"... Health care? check, Maternity leave? check, Higher education? check any more???
m

Warpy

(111,243 posts)
7. Oh, I've described a system wherein everybody puts money into a pot
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 05:23 AM
Feb 2020

Last edited Sat Feb 15, 2020, 02:02 PM - Edit history (1)

and if somebody has a run of bad luck, they can dip into that pot for whatever they need to get them back on their feet.

To the cries "of that's socialism! We hate socialism! We want liberty, not socialism!" I reply that what I just described is the whole insurance industry--car, life, homeowners, health.

Most of them just start mumbling bumper sticker phrases out of context and stomp off. I have to hope at least a few of them start thinking about how the world really works and why they fall a little farther behind every year, no matter how much work they're putting in.

Pointing out who's getting the lion's share of the taxpayer pot is good, too.

DFW

(54,341 posts)
8. I used to do something similar when I was in the States during the Bush days.
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 05:44 AM
Feb 2020

I'd start saying how awful I thought it was that some jerk son of a former leader liked playing at being a soldier hero when he was nothing of the sort, and if he had not been the son of a former leader, he would have been sweeping streets or doing some simple clerical work in tune with his minimal abilities.

Oh, how the Texas Republicans would light into me for insulting their great president, George W. Bush!! That is, until I explained that I was referring to communist North Korea and Kim Jong Il--but if they saw that many parallels, maybe there was something to it.

Similar angry mumbling and walking away, needless to say!

Joinfortmill

(14,414 posts)
18. Ha! So true
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 10:50 AM
Feb 2020

We can't seem to get through to people the amount of corporate socialism in this country. The comeback is "They're job creators." Well, yes, they are. And people fill those jobs, and build products, and sell products, and do the payroll, and sweep the floors. And make their phucking businesses possible. And that doesn't include all the municipal benefits they receive whether they pay taxes or not, like roads, police, fire-fighters, and utilities. I could go on, but you get the picture. It's just a scam not to pay taxes. If "corporations are people" they need to pay taxes like people.

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
19. I want my tax return to include the list of things that I want to pay taxes for
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 11:08 AM
Feb 2020

and the things I don't want to pay taxes for...
you don't want to support birth control and abortion, great...don't
but I don't want to support charter schools, expansion of the military, and trump golf trips just for starters

we all have this intimate discussion with the government every year...
we should be able to give not just input but some level of budgetary control (and yes, I realize that it would only be a symbolic part of the federal budget...but it would be better than nothing)

Progressive dog

(6,900 posts)
21. Food stamps are not socialism.
Sat Feb 15, 2020, 11:08 PM
Feb 2020

Socialism

a political and economic theory of social organization which advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
I;m not certain whether people who advocate socialism don;t know what the word means or if the socialist salesmen are that deceptive.

moondust

(19,972 posts)
24. Many people
Sun Feb 16, 2020, 01:02 AM
Feb 2020

seem to use a simple criterion for differentiating "socialism" from "capitalism":

Is it something the federal/state/local government provides using tax revenues or something a private party provides for a profit?

Thus some people refer to fire and police departments, streets and highways, and other public services as "socialist" even if they don't technically meet that dictionary definition.

Progressive dog

(6,900 posts)
32. If every thing the government does is socialism,
Mon Feb 17, 2020, 08:30 PM
Feb 2020

then someone running for government office and declaring themself to be a socialist would be pretty stupid. The government uses tax revenues to do everything.
That definition certainly does not meet the dictionary definition, it bears no resemblance to it. Communication requires agreed upon definitions for words, which is why we have dictionaries.

Nature Man

(869 posts)
30. food stamps are a-ok to these folks
Sun Feb 16, 2020, 01:28 PM
Feb 2020

as long white people are the only ones getting them.

Then they gloss over that white people get them in the first place.

moondust

(19,972 posts)
23. When did Bernie adopt the label
Sun Feb 16, 2020, 12:48 AM
Feb 2020

"Democratic Socialist"? Did he not know how he and his supporters would be stigmatized by that label alone regardless of what it meant to them or anybody else? Did he adopt it just to be "different" or a "new breed" of politician or something?

brush

(53,764 posts)
26. Sanders has been calling himself a "socialist" for decades.
Sun Feb 16, 2020, 10:22 AM
Feb 2020

He regularly appeared on "The Thom Hartman" radio show for years and proudly called himself a "socialist" without the word "democratic" in front of it.

In more recent years he's added the word "democratic" in front of it to soften the negativity of it as he became interested in using the Democratic Party to run for president. But video and ample other evidence is out there of him touting socialism. He should've said years ago he was a "social democrat" if that is really what he meant but he's stuck with the baggage-laden, self-appellation of "democratic socialist" when the social democracies of Europe are actually capitalist countries, not democratic socialist countries.

Labeling himself a democratic socialist was a mistake not just because there actually is a Democratic Socialist Party in the US which actively advocates actual socialism, historically there's never been a sustained, successful deployment of socialism in any country. And as I said, the social democracies of Europe are actually highly regulated and highly taxed capitalist countries with strong, robust safety nets provided for by the high taxes—single payer healthcare, free college, etc..

moondust

(19,972 posts)
31. Oh.
Sun Feb 16, 2020, 02:04 PM
Feb 2020

I didn't know about his past identification as a "socialist." I'm surprised he didn't know how toxic that label alone could prove to be outside the state of Vermont where there are ideologues and professional propagandists with decades of experience in using the term as a scarecrow.

Thanks.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So, you hate socialism, y...