General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsExpert's opinions on the coronavirus outbreak
Expanded answers can be accessed at this site at this site.[asked about prediction that Covid-19 could affect 2/3 of world's population]
Dr. Michael Ryan
Executive Director
WHO Health Emergencies Programme
Feb. 17, 2020
Prof. Marc Lipsitch
Prof. of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health
Head, Harvard Ctr. Communicable Disease Dynamics
Feb. 14, 2020
Dr. Robert Redfield
Director, CDC
US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Feb. 13, 2020
What makes this one perhaps harder to control than SARS is that it may be possible to transmit before you are sick.
I think we should be prepared for the equivalent of a very, very bad flu season, or maybe the worst-ever flu season in modern times.
Prof. Marc Lipsitch
Prof. of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health
Head, Harvard Ctr. Communicable Disease Dynamics
Feb. 11, 2020
Prof. Nanshan Zhong
Leading epidemiologist, first to describe SARS coronavirus
Feb. 11, 2020
Prof. Gabriel Leung
Expert on coronavirus epidemics
Chair of Public Health Medicine
Hong Kong University
Feb. 11, 2020
Prof. W. Ian Lipkin
Epidemiology Director
Columbia University
Feb. 10, 2020
Prof. Niall Ferguson
Director, Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics
Imperial College, LondonFeb. 6, 2020
Dr. Peter Piot
(Director, The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine)
Feb. 2, 2020
Robert Webster
(Infectious disease and avian flu expert at St. Jude Childrens Research Hospital)
Feb. 2, 2020
Dr. Thomas R. Frieden
(Former Director of CDC)
Feb. 2, 2020
Dr. Anthony S. Fauci
(Director, National Inst. Allergy and Infectious Disease)
Feb. 2, 2020
Dr. Mike Ryan
(Head of the WHOs Emergencies Program)
Feb. 1, 2020
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)this new coronavirus using flu vaccines and HIV medications together. Other folks are also using
and exploring this approach. Too bad so many professionals just don't know...
defacto7
(13,485 posts)unsuccessful in others and is a few cases made it worse. I think the professionals are just not sure what is happening there. Supposedly 80% of the genome is identical to SARS which makes the SARS vaccine pretty close to what they're looking for in a new vaccine.
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)THINKS it's doing good then it does.
Mariana
(14,854 posts)abqtommy
(14,118 posts)search mode. I'll give you some slack this time..,.
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffhp&q=latest+news+about+the+thai+flu%2Fhiv+tratment+for+the+new+coronavirus&ia=news
Mariana
(14,854 posts)Have there been any recent stories about this treatment?
abqtommy
(14,118 posts)Mariana
(14,854 posts)Do you really consider a two week old story to be "new info" in this context?
tblue37
(65,334 posts)smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)soryang
(3,299 posts)defacto7
(13,485 posts)soryang
(3,299 posts)I had watched some South Korean youtube yesterday that was based on Japanese sources that was critical of Abe treating the Diamond Princess as a police or security matter to be "stopped at the waterfront" rather than being managed as a public health problem. The shortage of experts on infectious disease in their government, and the fact that no one with expert credentials was managing the health problem on the ship were mentioned here and there in other news media but were not put together in the English language press.
defacto7
(13,485 posts)Is carefully trying to downplay the whole thing. Not a lot but just what they can get away with. There was a full report on msn that was saying that the death toll in China was falling and was under 100 for the first time since Jan. But their numbers were incorrect by 2. They stated 98 deaths reported. The number was actually 100 which changed the whole narative of their story. It's not much of a difference but they were able to downplay it in their article just by lowering the number by 2. All I want are the facts.
i can understand when reporters on the scene may not yet have the latest facts when they are preparing for a live broadcast but anything other than facts is to be avoided when there are so many unknowns at this point.
The US used it's political pull with Japan to get our people off the ship. The presence of a US doctor on board with some experience studying an older epidemic, i'm sure helped decision makers.
I think there is a desire to get to the bottom of any misrepresentations or coverup on the Chinese side, but the bias goes the other way toward Japan.
moondust
(19,972 posts)As long as they work and aren't fakes.