Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy did Trump get rid of Acting DNI Joseph Maguire?
Is this still part of his vengeance tour, after his acquittal?
Maguire was the acting Director of National Intelligence when the IC Inspector General informed him of the whistleblower report about Ukraine.
Did Trump hold him accountable for the information getting to the House Intelligence Committee?
Was he not loyal enough?
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why did Trump get rid of Acting DNI Joseph Maguire? (Original Post)
kentuck
Feb 2020
OP
leftieNanner
(16,131 posts)1. He was Acting
And there is a term limit for acting cabinet members. So The Orange One had to replace him.
jimfields33
(19,382 posts)2. I never heard of the guy
Its literally a revolving door at the administration. Who can possibly keep up with whos who?
Response to jimfields33 (Reply #2)
GusBob This message was self-deleted by its author.
Ilsa
(64,026 posts)7. That's the WH spin, but I don't believe it.
It was retribution and trump was pissed that he shared any intel on election security.
blaze
(8,209 posts)3. intel official in charge of election security, who works for Maguire, gave a classified briefing
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/after-a-congressional-briefing-on-election-threats-trump-soured-on-acting-spy-chief/2020/02/20/1ed2b4ec-53f1-11ea-b119-4faabac6674f_story.html
Maguire had been considered a leading candidate to be nominated for the post of DNI, White House aides had said. But Trumps opinion shifted last week when he heard from a GOP ally that the intelligence official in charge of election security, who works for Maguire, gave a classified briefing last Thursday to the House Intelligence Committee on 2020 election security.
It is unclear what the official, Shelby Pierson, specifically said at the briefing that angered Trump, but the president erroneously believed that she had given information exclusively to Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), the committee chairman, and that the information would be helpful to Democrats if it were released publicly, the people familiar with the matter said. Schiff was the lead impeachment manager, or prosecutor, during Trumps Senate trial on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
The president was furious with Maguire and blamed him for the supposed transgression involving Pierson when the two met the next day.
There was a dressing down of Maguire, said one individual, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter. That was the catalyst that led to the sidelining of Maguire in favor of Grenell, the person said.
Maguire had been considered a leading candidate to be nominated for the post of DNI, White House aides had said. But Trumps opinion shifted last week when he heard from a GOP ally that the intelligence official in charge of election security, who works for Maguire, gave a classified briefing last Thursday to the House Intelligence Committee on 2020 election security.
It is unclear what the official, Shelby Pierson, specifically said at the briefing that angered Trump, but the president erroneously believed that she had given information exclusively to Rep. Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.), the committee chairman, and that the information would be helpful to Democrats if it were released publicly, the people familiar with the matter said. Schiff was the lead impeachment manager, or prosecutor, during Trumps Senate trial on charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.
The president was furious with Maguire and blamed him for the supposed transgression involving Pierson when the two met the next day.
There was a dressing down of Maguire, said one individual, who, like others, spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss a sensitive matter. That was the catalyst that led to the sidelining of Maguire in favor of Grenell, the person said.
kentuck
(115,277 posts)4. Well, that make sense now.
Not loyal enough for Mr Trump.
struggle4progress
(125,677 posts)6. "Putin says: Disrupt and discredit US intelligence!"
kentuck
(115,277 posts)8. All roads still lead to Russia.
Just as Nancy said.
