General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAll that is said is, "Roger Stone sentenced..." Is he in jail yet??????
Or are they giving him more time to pack??????????
jimfields33
(19,382 posts)Maraya1969
(23,501 posts)from the court room into the jail!
WTF
This reminds me of Jack Abramoff. Eventually he got away with everything after stalling for years.
ecstatic
(35,075 posts)I'm sick of the double standards!
C_U_L8R
(49,394 posts)will be a coveted prize in the prison shower room.
True Blue American
(18,579 posts) They say Roger lied, but other people lie,too! He does not know the irony of his own words.
Went into a rant bout Stroft, the lovers.
maxsolomon
(38,749 posts)Par for the course, DU. Never change!
C_U_L8R
(49,394 posts)onenote
(46,147 posts)which should be dealt with relatively quickly.
Stone filed an earlier motion for new trial based on a challenge to a different juror, and the government filed its opposition, sometime between November 25 and December 16. Judge Jackson denied the motion in a 15 page order adopted on February 5 -- probably around two months after the government's opposition was filed. There was no particular need for Jackson to move more quickly since the sentencing process was still ahead of her.
The current motion to for a new trial was filed on February 14 and Judge Jackson immediately set a deadline for February 18 for the government's opposition and, upon request by Stone, gave his counsel until Feb. 24 to reply. I would expect a decision from Jackson on the motion by early March (less than a month from now).
If Stone appeals, it will be up to Jackson to decide whether to grant him bail while the appeal is pending. It is a matter for the judge's discretion.
global1
(26,507 posts)onenote
(46,147 posts)and everything to do with the fact that he has a motion pending for a new trial.
tavernier
(14,444 posts)when it comes to trials... does a motion for a new trial automatically mean that you dont have to go to jail until the motion is resolved? And if so, why doesnt everyone do that?
onenote
(46,147 posts)Essentially, the judge has the discretion to continue a defendant's bail post-verdict if a motion for a new trial is pending. Same thing when an appeal is filed. The judge may decide to order the defendant to begin serving immediately or may continue bail.
For example, Blagojevich was ordered to start serving his sentence while his appeal (which ultimately was granted in part) was pending. On the other hand, Rep. Jefferson was convicted in 2009, but was not ordered to report to prison until 2012 after his appeal was denied. It's really up to the judge.
tavernier
(14,444 posts)Doesnt seem right though that it is so arbitrary.