Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAny word from Judge Amy Berman-Jackson this morning
I so want her lock up Stone and now
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 759 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Any word from Judge Amy Berman-Jackson this morning (Original Post)
malaise
Feb 2020
OP
hlthe2b
(102,442 posts)1. So do I, but it is likely she'll give him several weeks before reporting...
Just don't be surprised. She's bent over backwards to be fair (and be perceived as fair). That will go a very long way towards negating any attempts to get her rulings overturned on appeal.
guillaumeb
(42,641 posts)2. Excellent points.
She has been very tolerant of Stone, even as he was behaving in a very Trumpian fashion.
IcyPeas
(21,916 posts)5. what became of all the jurors being called back in?
what was that about?
hlthe2b
(102,442 posts)6. Apparently only three of them were actually called into the proceedings to respond to
questions about the jury process. It would appear nothing unexpected came from that.
The judge also castigated the defense for claims that information about possible bias of the jury foreman had been withheld or not identified. She asked them if they had even done a simple google search of the jurors during selection. They had not, claiming it was too costly. (!)
dewsgirl
(14,961 posts)3. I know we all want that, but no she isn't going to do that.
gopiscrap
(23,765 posts)4. me too