Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
24 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Flattening the Curve question for Stats/Math Nerds (Original Post) Botany Mar 2020 OP
It can accomplish both lower peak demand and fewer infections PSPS Mar 2020 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author bearsfootball516 Mar 2020 #2
Yes, but it keeps the peak lower. RichardRay Mar 2020 #3
The point of flattening the curve Salviati Mar 2020 #4
The concept of flattening the curve is to reduce the rate but not the overall number... Girard442 Mar 2020 #5
Pretty close--and that's a very good thing. AleksS Mar 2020 #6
Here's a way to think about it... CincyDem Mar 2020 #7
Nice analogy! cos dem Mar 2020 #11
Haha. Yeah. Once you try the gallon challenge... CincyDem Mar 2020 #19
Why does this put me in mind of colonoscopy prep? misanthrope Mar 2020 #22
Having done both, trust me...the colonoscopy prep is much easier. Lol. n/t CincyDem Mar 2020 #24
Basically, yes. cos dem Mar 2020 #8
Yes. That's the point. jberryhill Mar 2020 #9
To address an underlying point we don't have unfettered testing so we don't know how long... uponit7771 Mar 2020 #10
this is a pretty comprehensive explaination Takket Mar 2020 #12
Was able to tease a simulation off their site BumRushDaShow Mar 2020 #16
Thank you Botany Mar 2020 #17
If the curve flattens out enough, we make get a vaccine before some people get sick. Jim__ Mar 2020 #13
Not to compare COVID-19 to the Flu... Windy City Charlie Mar 2020 #14
And as an aside, Igel Mar 2020 #23
One helpful side effect may also be reducing the number of cases and fatalities Ms. Toad Mar 2020 #15
Yes, but... Drahthaardogs Mar 2020 #18
Yes. Flattening the curve is about preventing deaths, not total cases, over time. RockRaven Mar 2020 #20
Just spitballing.... Brainfodder Mar 2020 #21

Response to Botany (Original post)

RichardRay

(2,611 posts)
3. Yes, but it keeps the peak lower.
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 01:39 PM
Mar 2020

Hopefully, the peak remains below the capacity of the healthcare sector to treat the cases. It avoids triage such as were seeing in Italy where docs are having to let some patients go without treatment in order to treat others with a better chance of living.

Salviati

(6,008 posts)
4. The point of flattening the curve
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 01:40 PM
Mar 2020

is primarily to keep from overwhelming the capacity of the healthcare system, so while it may possibly reduce the total number (due to getting a better handle on how it's spread, improving best practices, and possibly developing some effective medical treatments with the time we buy) that isn't the primary goal.

Girard442

(6,070 posts)
5. The concept of flattening the curve is to reduce the rate but not the overall number...
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 01:40 PM
Mar 2020

...all things being equal. People are working their butts off to see that all things will NOT remain equal. Time buys hope.

AleksS

(1,665 posts)
6. Pretty close--and that's a very good thing.
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 01:40 PM
Mar 2020

Pretty close, and that's just fine. There'll be a slight decrease, especially if treatments advance near the tail end of the curve, or a vaccine is developed earlier than anticipated, but the big advantage is not overwhelming the system.

For example: If you know you will have 100 cases that will need hospitalization, and only have 10 hospital beds, its WAY better to have 10 cases at a time, 10 times, than to have one blast of 100 cases arrive all at once. In the first case, everyone gets care. In the second case 90 cases are up a creek without a paddle.

That's why slowing the spread/flattening the curve is so important.

CincyDem

(6,351 posts)
7. Here's a way to think about it...
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 01:40 PM
Mar 2020


Over the course of a week, I probably drink a gallon of milk. No issues.

If I try to drink that gallon of milk over the course of 5 minutes...I woof my cookies because my stomach can't take the change in acidity.

So the same amount of milk gets drunk but my system can handle it.

Imagine milk = virus cases and my stomach = hospitals.

It's not about the number of cases...it's about the rate of cases. One gallon a week = OK, One gallon in 5 minutes = not ok.



That's my take on flattening the curve.

CincyDem

(6,351 posts)
19. Haha. Yeah. Once you try the gallon challenge...
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 02:08 PM
Mar 2020

....it’s the life event through which all other events are filtered. Lolol.

Have a good one.

cos dem

(903 posts)
8. Basically, yes.
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 01:42 PM
Mar 2020

However, keep in mind these are pretty simple math models, and don't account for the inevitable feedback mechanism of human behavior. This is both good and bad. The bad part is people looking at today's data, not understanding exponential growth, and thinking things will be fine. The good part is those starting to take it seriously, with cancellation of sports, concerts, school, etc. All of this plays into a much more complicated outcome, with potentially fewer cases overall.

The one thing that can be said for sure, is that if the "flattened curve" avoids exceeding the medical capacity of our hospitals, that fewer deaths will result, because the serious cases will be able to be dealt with, rather being triaged and rationed the way they are in Italy right now.

For other math nerds:
My main area of expertise is signal processing, and I find it very interesting how the "flattened curve" resembles the impulse response of a bandlimiting filter. The energy in the impulse remains the same, but the response is stretched in time, and also delayed by the group delay of the filter.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
9. Yes. That's the point.
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 01:43 PM
Mar 2020

If your area is set up to have 1000 births a year, then maternity facilities for six to nine people is fine.

If those 1000 births occur today, your facility is fucked.

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
10. To address an underlying point we don't have unfettered testing so we don't know how long...
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 01:43 PM
Mar 2020

... the flat curve will last.

BumRushDaShow

(128,844 posts)
16. Was able to tease a simulation off their site
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 01:56 PM
Mar 2020
Free-for-all (upper left chart)
Attempted quarantine (upper right chart)
Moderate distancing (lower left chart)
Extensive distancing (lower right chart)

Jim__

(14,075 posts)
13. If the curve flattens out enough, we make get a vaccine before some people get sick.
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 01:49 PM
Mar 2020

It's possible that everyone will get sick before there's a vaccine, but it's also possible that we'll get a vaccine before then. The immediate point of flattening the curve is to avoid overwhelming the healthcare system.

Windy City Charlie

(1,178 posts)
14. Not to compare COVID-19 to the Flu...
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 01:51 PM
Mar 2020

But what you're trying to do is have COVID-19 have the same impact on the health care system as what a normal flu season is, so that the health care system can keep up with the demand. In other words, if you had the number of flu cases in the short period of time that COVID-19 could have without flattening the curve, there's no way the health care system could handle that. Yet the COVID-19 cases are expected to be much worse even during a much less period of time. It's about making sure the health care system can sustain itself, not only with COVID-19 cases, but with other conditions as well.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
23. And as an aside,
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 02:33 PM
Mar 2020

still not comparing, but merging the flu and covid because there's feedback between the two already ...

They're going to largely target the same populations. If covid becomes permanent, it'll bleed flu mortality rates just as annual flu deaths will have already reduced covid lethality.

Ms. Toad

(34,062 posts)
15. One helpful side effect may also be reducing the number of cases and fatalities
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 01:55 PM
Mar 2020

Flattening the curve gives some of us time to wait for a vaccine. Treatment will not be quite so crazy, so the medical team may be able to identify treatments that make survival more likely (either because experience often improved methods -or because our medical teams have space between patients to reflect on what they are seeing to evaluate what works. But this is a side effect - the main goal is just to survive.)

Drahthaardogs

(6,843 posts)
18. Yes, but...
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 02:02 PM
Mar 2020

1) it will allow us to not overwhelm our system which means better care for all

2) Gives us more time to try better treatments

RockRaven

(14,958 posts)
20. Yes. Flattening the curve is about preventing deaths, not total cases, over time.
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 02:17 PM
Mar 2020

We have the capacity to provide the necessary life-saving treatment to X number of people in any given day. If the number of people who need life-saving treatment, Y, exceeds X then the difference between X and Y will be how many people die that day for want of adequate health care.

That's why the morons who say everyone should get infected on purpose right away so the economic impact is limited to a shorter period of times are so sociopathic -- they are totally unconcerned with many thousands or millions of preventable deaths due to lack of health care resources.

If you stretch the curve out long enough, not only does this lower the peak (i.e. decrease the peak value of Y), but it increases the time until the peak which may allow, by judicious marshaling and coordination of our resources, us to increase X or at least keep it as high as possible for as long as possible.

Brainfodder

(6,423 posts)
21. Just spitballing....
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 02:30 PM
Mar 2020

Things to add in the mix.....

# of hospital beds.... get quoted under a million.....

What is failed to be mentioned..... LOCATION....

SOME OF US ARE GOING TO BE TOO FAR AWAY and no choice in their time of dire need.

Red counties not near cities not near hospitals!?!

Add the stress to the so called HC system, the claims, their horrific BS internally... it's part of the business model, that forces it to SUCK SUCK SUCK?

That's just beds.... You need breathing apparatus and these clowns in charge can't be trusted to even order one even if they said they have?

Every doctor and RN available will probably wind up exhausted and that will lead to errors....

~spit~

Good luck!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Flattening the Curve ques...