Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

McCamy Taylor

(19,240 posts)
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 09:39 PM Mar 2020

Did Trump Shut Down Our Pandemic Response to Please Right to Life?

In particular, did the religious right take offense at efforts to prevent the spread of infectious killers because they feared that such efforts would causes countries to loosen restrictions against abortion and birth control? Did Trump shoot our country in both feet by crippling our ability to respond to global pandemics because abortion foes would rather see us all dead than have a meaningful debate on contraception?

Recall that the two biggest threats before Trump were Ebola and Zika. And Zika, in particular had the potential to become what rubella once was--a reason to make abortion a matter of choice not law due to the risk of birth defects in affected embryos.

(Before you report me for citing right wing sites, the whole point of this piece is to see if the Right objected to world pandemic public health planning in the years before Trump)

Here is an example:

There is nothing–nothing wonderful, nothing tragic, and nothing in-between–that the Abortion Lobby will not attempt to exploit to further its ever-expanding death agenda.


https://www.nationalrighttolifenews.org/2016/02/standing-up-against-the-barrage-of-pro-abortion-propaganda-to-use-zika-virus-as-a-reason-to-tear-down-protective-abortion-laws/

Here is another example:

The real dangers in this situation aren’t from a virus, they’re from the global penchant for using panic to push specific agendas, and an utter disdain for human life.


https://townhall.com/columnists/megantoombs/2016/06/28/zika-abortion-and-population-control-the-hype-and-the-real-danger-n2184219

Here is a 2016 public health planning document about how we should respond to Zika. Notice how often the plan calls for improvement in family planning services.

https://www.phe.gov/Preparedness/planning/Documents/zika-response-plan2016.pdf

Some in Congress delayed funding to fight Zika due to concerns that Planned Parenthood might benefit

The delay came out because of disagreement over side issues like funding for Planned Parenthood and whether the money should be considered "emergency" spending.


https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2016/09/28/495806979/congress-ends-spat-over-zika-funding-approves-1-1-billion

Trump is now claiming that he crippled our public health pandemic disease fighting readiness 1) to save money and 2) because it was part of Obama's legacy. But I think it was neither. I think that those who hate women and hate for women to have control over their own bodies persuaded him to do it because they would rather see us all dead than give a woman the right to choose. Meaning that Trump allowed politics to literally trump our health.

Right to Life (and the politicians who pander to you)---you are truly the agents of death and destruction.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Did Trump Shut Down Our Pandemic Response to Please Right to Life? (Original Post) McCamy Taylor Mar 2020 OP
It was also on a Koch Bros list of cuts they wanted. . . . nt Bernardo de La Paz Mar 2020 #1
Eh, little too far-fetched for me TlalocW Mar 2020 #2
Letting people starve, suffer unwanted pregnancies, disease without social programs or gov't help.. Thomas Hurt Mar 2020 #3
I read a lot about fundies. They are TOTALLY opposed to women 50 Shades Of Blue Mar 2020 #4
While President Obama didn't begin the office he put more $$ /emphasis on its work... Princess Turandot Mar 2020 #5
Pro lifers are a group of psychopaths and hypocrites. Initech Mar 2020 #6
They're not pro-life, they're pro-birth OnlinePoker Mar 2020 #7
I Dearly wish flotsam Mar 2020 #8
Yeoman's Work. A HERETIC I AM Mar 2020 #9

TlalocW

(15,394 posts)
2. Eh, little too far-fetched for me
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 09:51 PM
Mar 2020

Simplest answer is that it was an Obama program, and he's jealous of Obama and is trying to get rid of everything he ever did.

TlalocW

Thomas Hurt

(13,903 posts)
3. Letting people starve, suffer unwanted pregnancies, disease without social programs or gov't help..
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 09:59 PM
Mar 2020

is standard conservative ideology.

Help yourself or die.

50 Shades Of Blue

(10,095 posts)
4. I read a lot about fundies. They are TOTALLY opposed to women
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 10:04 PM
Mar 2020

having any autonomy at all, much less reproductive autonomy - and they are totally warped and obsessed with the latter because women are really nothing but fetus receptacles to them.So no -- I would not put it past them to push for allowing a deadly pandemic if they had to choose between that or even the faintest, most remote chance that alleviating the pandemic would result in a single abortion. They're that obsessed and that misogynistic, with their "faith" as a cover for it.

Princess Turandot

(4,789 posts)
5. While President Obama didn't begin the office he put more $$ /emphasis on its work...
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 10:12 PM
Mar 2020

That undoubtedly played a large role in Trump's decision, as it seems to have done with so many things. I'm convinced that his staff have a list of programs related to PBO, one of which is suggested for the chopping block whenever Trump has a bad day. (I think that they schedule his rallies for the same reason.)

As to right-for-life issues, increasing the number of pregnant women exposed to diseases that can harm the fetus would increase, not reduce, potential abortions.

Initech

(100,135 posts)
6. Pro lifers are a group of psychopaths and hypocrites.
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 11:09 PM
Mar 2020

Jesus would hate these people. I always wonder how you can be pro-gun and pro-life. I would think those two beliefs would cancel each other out, no?

OnlinePoker

(5,729 posts)
7. They're not pro-life, they're pro-birth
Sun Mar 15, 2020, 11:11 PM
Mar 2020

They don't give a shit what happens to the mother/child once the baby is born.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Did Trump Shut Down Our P...