Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Crunchy Frog

(26,574 posts)
Sun Mar 29, 2020, 02:48 AM Mar 2020

'Women Will Not Be Forced to Be Alone When They Are Giving Birth'

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/28/parenting/nyc-coronavirus-hospitals-visitors-labor.html

In response to some private hospitals’ decision to bar partners, New York will order all hospitals to allow partners in delivery rooms, despite the coronavirus risk.

Melissa DeRosa, the secretary to Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo, announced that an executive order would be issued that required all hospitals in New York, both public and private, to allow women to have a partner in the labor and delivery room — in compliance with the latest guidance from the New York State Department of Health.

The order, which the governor released Saturday night, is a response to a decision earlier this week by two major New York City hospital systems, NewYork-Presbyterian and Mount Sinai, to ban support people from labor and delivery rooms because of the coronavirus pandemic.


This is a very sound decision IMO. Apparently panicked pregnant women were preparing to stampede to other states to give birth, or even hastily deciding on poorly planned home births.


6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Women Will Not Be Forced to Be Alone When They Are Giving Birth' (Original Post) Crunchy Frog Mar 2020 OP
Presumably the "partner" has been in repeated close contact with the birthgiver recently. n/t PoliticAverse Mar 2020 #1
I hope other states realize a partner in the labor room isn't dangerous-- dawg day Mar 2020 #2
I think they didn't think through the possible unforseen consequences of this policy. Crunchy Frog Mar 2020 #3
I can't even imagine the rationale for this DFW Mar 2020 #4
My DIL is due May 4th, my son is in Qatar, as of now I will dewsgirl Mar 2020 #5
Giving this a kick. Crunchy Frog Mar 2020 #6

dawg day

(7,947 posts)
2. I hope other states realize a partner in the labor room isn't dangerous--
Sun Mar 29, 2020, 03:34 AM
Mar 2020

A young friend of mine-- a month from delivery-- was starting to talk about home birth because she didn't want to deliver alone (of course, with nurse and doctor). She hasn't been able to find a midwife in her area. If she can have her husband with her, she would feel much better about delivering in the hospital.

I think it would be scary to be pregnant now... so little certainty. The joy will be mitigated by the fear.

Crunchy Frog

(26,574 posts)
3. I think they didn't think through the possible unforseen consequences of this policy.
Sun Mar 29, 2020, 05:06 AM
Mar 2020

Whatever the possible benefits may be, the potential costs are likely far greater. I'm glad that the Governor rescinded it.

Someone on the Reddit forum, who had a home birth, said that her midwife had suddenly been inundated with hundreds of calls.

DFW

(54,268 posts)
4. I can't even imagine the rationale for this
Sun Mar 29, 2020, 05:10 AM
Mar 2020

I would have broken through a brick wall to be by my wife's side when she gave birth to our daughters (luckily I didn't have to).

dewsgirl

(14,961 posts)
5. My DIL is due May 4th, my son is in Qatar, as of now I will
Sun Mar 29, 2020, 05:43 AM
Mar 2020

be in the delivery room with her. They have already warned her this is likely to change, we're in Florida.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»'Women Will Not Be Forced...