Justice Ginsburg sends out dire warning about the new Supreme Court ruling in Wisconsin election cas

[SheltieLover]

[link:https://www.rawstory.com/2020/04/justice-ginsburg-sends-out-dire-warning-about-the-new-supreme-court-ruling-in-wisconsin-election-case/|

Ad-Free Login - Go Ad-Free & Join The Movement
Justice Ginsburg sends out dire warning about the new Supreme Court ruling in Wisconsin election case
Published 2 mins ago on April 6, 2020By Cody Fenwick, AlterNet



Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg issued a disturbing dissent on Monday as the conservative majority of the U.S. Supreme Court intervened in Tuesday’s upcoming Wisconsin election with a move she warned could result in “massive disenfranchisement.”

Lots more at link!
RBG!

[Gothmog]

1. This was a great dissent

Link to tweet

[SheltieLover]

4. Absolutely!

Funny, how they have time for this, but dragging their knuckles...I mean feet over dump's tax returns.

Yes, I know, time is of the essence, but wasn't it during impeachment? 🤬

[crickets]

15. +1

[Greybnk48]

2. My son hasn't gotten his ballot yet

because they were short handed! If we don't get it tomorrow, he can't vote. He's voted in every election for 17 years and can prove it.

Milwaukee is going to be ground zero for disenfranchisement. Block all of those nasty Democrats from voting. Fuckers!

[SheltieLover]

5. Rotten repukes!

I only hope the country wakes the fk up!

[jimfields33]

7. I remember Florida had the primary

We were criticized for having it. I remember some criticized Ohio for not having it. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t I guess.

[W_HAMILTON]

3. This needs to be a bigger story.

This is one of the most callous disregards for democracy I have seen in a long time, and that is saying something given how fucking deplorable Republicans are.

Wisconsin with their conservative buddies on the U.S. Supreme Court are literally trying to get away with stealing a ten-year state supreme court seat and it's like no one is even talking about this?!

[SheltieLover]

6. Right!

Media won't go there as they might offend dump. 🤮

[budkin]

8. SCOTUS Kangaroo Court

We must add more justices when we take back control.

[SheltieLover]

10. Absolutely!

👍

[dustyscamp]

9. I hope someone out there is creating a list of these to put into a Anti Con ad one day

It'd be a big mistake not too

[ancianita]

11. WI will be seen by the Koch/Mercer/DeVos cabal as a successful beta test of the whole country.

Billions Of $ at theirs and BD's disposal will be spent to make that happen.

And NOW WI is the legal precedent.

Looks like SCOTUS is headed toward ruling this democracy out of existence if SCOTUS takes this ruling as a legitimate precedent in a time of pandemic.

[colsohlibgal]

12. They Have To Depend On Stuff Like This

They can only hope to win by Gerrymandering, making it tough to vote in Democratic leaning Precincts, and by “Citizens United” allowing the likes of the Koch’s to spend Billions.

They are comfortably the minority party. They depend on the above and by desolate States like Wyoming having 2 Senators just like California and New York.....which have Cities with more people than some of these States.

On a level playing field they have no shot so they had to rig the game.

[SheltieLover]

13. Yup!

Who the fk would vote for a repuke? 🤮

[Grins]

14. "I do not doubt the good faith of my colleagues..."

I don’t believe that for a nanosecond.

[Proud Liberal Dem]

16. Probably a little disclaimer every good Justice has to write

before going in for the kill.