General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTesting is the key.
All Americans need to sign up. Do the necessary testing that helps figure this virus out. Get tested.
If not sick / not infected...why?
If not sick/infected......whats your tracking profile?
If sick/infected......what's your tracking profile?
The faster we provide individual data, the better we can target response.
AlexSFCA
(6,137 posts)for quick screening.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... we are very far behind.
If everything was perfect tomorrow we would still need ongoing 1% of population tested on top of symptomatic to get back to normal.
WHO said "test test test" ... the country that put a man on the moon is far behind this edict
OAITW r.2.0
(24,467 posts)We don't have a Federal Executive branch leadership to make this happen.
woodsprite
(11,913 posts)for our population of 980K, and we're a small state.
Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)I thought random tests would be better and that maybe they could set up place like in a store where people could sign up. Maybe dont allow more than a couple of people at a time?
What would the right way to do that be?
How many random tests per million would be needed for good data?
Is there enough testing supply? How many tests for good enough data?
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Midnightwalk
(3,131 posts)How many would have to be diverted to track infection rates better? Or is there enough data from the number of negatives
Im not even sure if better data would help any policy decisions. Maybe it would tell us something useful for the next wave?
Or are all the tests still being used in effect to tell healthcare workers which patients are infectious?