Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OAITW r.2.0

(24,467 posts)
Mon Apr 6, 2020, 09:10 PM Apr 2020

Testing is the key.

All Americans need to sign up. Do the necessary testing that helps figure this virus out. Get tested.

If not sick / not infected...why?
If not sick/infected......whats your tracking profile?
If sick/infected......what's your tracking profile?

The faster we provide individual data, the better we can target response.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
2. K&R, Us is testing less than 5k/1 mil while S Korea, Germany, HK are testing at 10 - 15k/mil
Mon Apr 6, 2020, 09:13 PM
Apr 2020

... we are very far behind.

If everything was perfect tomorrow we would still need ongoing 1% of population tested on top of symptomatic to get back to normal.

WHO said "test test test" ... the country that put a man on the moon is far behind this edict

OAITW r.2.0

(24,467 posts)
3. US Healthcare has a system in place to do this.
Mon Apr 6, 2020, 09:17 PM
Apr 2020

We don't have a Federal Executive branch leadership to make this happen.

woodsprite

(11,913 posts)
4. Might be awhile. Delaware just got a shipment of 5K tests
Mon Apr 6, 2020, 09:17 PM
Apr 2020

for our population of 980K, and we're a small state.

Midnightwalk

(3,131 posts)
6. How would that work?
Mon Apr 6, 2020, 09:31 PM
Apr 2020

I thought random tests would be better and that maybe they could set up place like in a store where people could sign up. Maybe don’t allow more than a couple of people at a time?

What would the right way to do that be?

How many random tests per million would be needed for good data?

Is there enough testing supply? How many tests for good enough data?

Midnightwalk

(3,131 posts)
8. Agree with first things first but
Mon Apr 6, 2020, 09:52 PM
Apr 2020

How many would have to be diverted to track infection rates better? Or is there enough data from the number of negatives

I’m not even sure if better data would help any policy decisions. Maybe it would tell us something useful for the next wave?

Or are all the tests still being used in effect to tell healthcare workers which patients are infectious?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Testing is the key.