Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hatrack

(59,583 posts)
Tue Apr 7, 2020, 07:51 AM Apr 2020

Bolsanaro's Approach To "Governing" - Conspiracy Theories & Bible-Thumping - Collapses Under COVID

EDIT

As the novel coronavirus continues to spread, the president of Brazil—Latin America’s largest country—is now the most prominent world leader still questioning isolation measures. Almost 500 people have died from Covid-19 complications in Brazil so far, with more than 7,000 people diagnosed. Those with precarious living arrangements, subject to unreliable infrastructure and the vicissitudes of the informal job market, will be hit hardest both by the disease and the measures designed to curb its advance. As one resident of Brazil’s largest favela, or slum, put it: “If everything stops, it will end people’s lives! There will be nothing people can do to survive!” But while it is sadly predictable that the poorest should bear the brunt of a public health emergency, Covid-19 is also having a surprising impact on Brazilian politics. Quite simply, it has upended them, enabling large-scale public defiance of Brazil’s far-right president from both ordinary people and elected officials in ways that would have been unthinkable mere weeks ago.

Erstwhile political allies are now locked in bitter public squabbles. Ambitious politicians with no clear path up the political ranks have found fresh vulnerabilities to exploit and challenges to meet. Millions of people around the country are banging pots and pans out their window on a nightly basis in a distinctively Latin American vote of no confidence in their president. If the election of radical right-wing retired army captain Jair Bolsonaro to the presidency represented “the ultimate validation of a right-wing resurgence that started gathering strength in 2013 when massive demonstrations of general dissatisfaction clogged the arteries of the country’s major cities,” as I argued upon his inauguration, the current moment has exposed him as woefully out of his depth. With terrible force, the novel coronavirus has forced a sudden change of perspective about what matters in a leader.

In late 2018, Bolsonaro rose from the wreckage of the country’s economic and political crises to the height of elected office. As a dogged defender of the country’s 1964–1985 military dictatorship and a staunch social conservative, Bolsonaro had unmatched credibility in harnessing the reactionary fervor that gripped Brazil after more than a decade of center-left Workers’ Party, or PT, governance. In his broad rollback of that leftist legacy, Bolsonaro has championed social service cuts, privatizations, rescinded labor rights, and reduced protections for indigenous peoples and other minorities. Now, from his isolated perch, the president drags his feet, resists containment measures, and dismisses the coronavirus as “just a little flu,” while the governors of states large and small ignore his mixed messaging and urge citizens to adhere to the stark guidelines set forth by the World Health Organization.

EDIT

In addressing the pandemic, Bolsonaro’s government has drawn from the repertoire of dissimulation it has resorted to when facing prior public relations crises, whether over allegations of corruption or its apparent countenance of deforestation in the Amazon. To parry criticism from abroad, the administration calls it an attempt to undermine the legitimacy of a duly elected president. Domestically, he casts any attack as a boon to an opposition that, in reality, remains fragmented and unpopular. More than anything, Bolsonaro’s political fortunes have thrived on a diet of conspiracy theories and siege mentality. First, his party insisted that the moderate leftism of the PT, a party whose luminaries have been applauded by the likes of George W. Bush and Barack Obama, would inevitably and intentionally turn Latin America’s largest country into Maduro’s Venezuela. On this point, Bolsonaro was supported by voters and voices from the center to the far right of the political spectrum. Then came the idea that foreign leaders and international organizations were playing up the damage caused by fires in the Amazon as a way of ultimately wresting the rain forest out of Brazilian hands. On this point, Bolsonaro also drew considerable if decidedly less support. Now, casting doubt on the propriety of WHO prescriptions, the government has found itself appealing solely to its most fervent base—Pentecostal pastors with megachurches in particular. The problem for Bolsonaro is clear: Covid-19 is not an abstract threat that can be invoked with little consequence and manipulated to fit immediate political needs. It is real, it is here, and it is killing people. His political strategy of diminishing returns, confronted with reality, appears on its last legs.

EDIT

https://newrepublic.com/article/157185/coronavirus-end-jair-bolsonaros-presidency

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Bolsanaro's Approach To "Governing" - Conspiracy Theories & Bible-Thumping - Collapses Under COVID (Original Post) hatrack Apr 2020 OP
All these charlatans and their so called religious fervor are going down with their malaise Apr 2020 #1
Neoliberal does not mean "anything bad I don't like" Loki Liesmith Apr 2020 #2
I know what it means and it is why we are here malaise Apr 2020 #3
I got your back, Malaise. Mike 03 Apr 2020 #5
I seriously doubt Obama would appreciate being called a "neoliberal" Clinton too I suspect. Mike 03 Apr 2020 #4
It's time for the Christian right movement to end. Initech Apr 2020 #6
A dangerous authoritarian, he is worse than Trump. BeckyDem Apr 2020 #7
Not unlike Trump ck4829 Apr 2020 #8

malaise

(268,850 posts)
1. All these charlatans and their so called religious fervor are going down with their
Tue Apr 7, 2020, 07:54 AM
Apr 2020

neo-liberal bullshit. Fuck them and their prosperity gospel. Just wait until their sheeple wake up - they will have nowhere to run.

Loki Liesmith

(4,602 posts)
2. Neoliberal does not mean "anything bad I don't like"
Tue Apr 7, 2020, 08:25 AM
Apr 2020

Bolsonaro is not a “neoliberal”. I am a neoliberal. Obama is a neoliberal. Bill Clinton was a neoliberal.

Bolsonaro is more a paleo-conservative.

Mike 03

(16,616 posts)
4. I seriously doubt Obama would appreciate being called a "neoliberal" Clinton too I suspect.
Tue Apr 7, 2020, 08:33 AM
Apr 2020

From what I gather, Bolsonaro is most certainly neoliberal based on his giving the rainforests to Big Ag, but that's only the most obvious example. There's also his selling out of indigenous peoples.

That term used to confuse me, but Chris Hedges explains it very well in his books.

Abstract
Neoliberal reforms lead to deep changes in healthcare systems around the world, on account of their emphasis on free market rather than the right to health. People with disabilities can be particularly disadvantaged by such reforms, due to their increased healthcare needs and lower socioeconomic status. In this article, we analyse the impacts of neoliberal reforms on access to healthcare for disabled people. This article is based on a critical analytical review of the literature and on two case studies, Chile and Greece. Chile was among the first countries to introduce neoliberal reforms in the health sector, which led to health inequalities and stratification of healthcare services. Greece is one of the most recent examples of countries that have carried out extensive changes in healthcare, which have resulted in a deterioration of the quality of healthcare services. Through a review of the policies performed in these two countries, we propose that the pathways that affect access to healthcare for disabled people include: a) Policies directly or indirectly targeting healthcare, affecting the entire population, including disabled people; and b) Policies affecting socioeconomic determinants, directly or indirectly targeting disabled people, and indirectly impacting access to healthcare. The power differentials produced through neoliberal policies that focus on economic rather than human rights indicators, can lead to a category of disempowered people, whose health needs are subordinated to the markets. The effects of this range from catastrophic out-of-pocket payments to compromised access to healthcare. Neoliberal reforms can be seen as a form of structural violence, disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable parts of the population – such as people with disabilities – and curtailing access to basic rights, such as healthcare.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5688676/

Wikipedia: https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism

Neoliberalism is a difficult term that deals specifically with economic ideas about free markets. Neoliberalism is characterized by free market trade, deregulation of financial markets, privatization, individualisation, and the shift away from state welfare provision. The neoliberal era began in the 1970s and continues to the present. It is a specific form of free market Capitalism that has largely come to dominate global economics. It was originally referred to as "globalization" and began with "Free Trade deals" in the 80s and 90s. The "anti-globalization" protests of the 90s were attempts to resist Neoliberalism. The term neoliberalism came to prominence in Academics in the early 2000s, and has been used in broader public circulation since the late 2000s, although because of the various meanings attached to the word Liberal, it is often misunderstood.

It is important to note that neoliberalism is strictly ideas about economic policies and is not related to the liberalism of American Democrats, those on the left, or progressives. Neo-liberalism is not to liberalism what neo-conservatism is to conservatism. In fact, the first implementation of neoliberal ideas into practice were initiated by Conservative governments (see Examples below). However, since its introduction, Neoliberal economic strategies are practiced by governments both on the left and the right - Liberals, Democrats, Conservatives and Republicans alike. Neoliberalism can be thought of as the revival of the economic ideas of the classic liberal era - during the enlightenment - thus it is a new form of classic enlightenment-era economic ideas (the same economic policies that lead to the Wall Street Crash of 1929, and the Great Depression of the 1930s)

These ideas were revived by a group of classic liberals (20th Century conservatives) who were concerned about the direction Keynesian (Welfare) economic practices might lead[1] In the 1940s, a group of economists including Friedrich Hayek, Ludwig von Mises, Milton Friedman, Frank Knight, Karl Popper, and George Stigler created the Mont Pelerin Society.[2] This organization was created to discuss and disseminate free market principles and ideas such as the removal of government intervention in economic affairs - ideas which would later form the foundation Neoliberalism and permeate the globe

Initech

(100,056 posts)
6. It's time for the Christian right movement to end.
Tue Apr 7, 2020, 09:41 AM
Apr 2020

They are done after this. It's time to get real leaders back in charge.

BeckyDem

(8,361 posts)
7. A dangerous authoritarian, he is worse than Trump.
Tue Apr 7, 2020, 09:48 AM
Apr 2020

Noam Chomsky Speaks Out On Brasil’s Manipulated 2018 Election

US linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, historian, political activist, and social critic, Noam Chomsky, has recently spoken out on the role of tech giants Google and Facebook in the manipulation of democratic elections, drawing parallels between recent outcomes in Germany and in Brazil.

Chomsky described the patterns of manipulation and fraud around Brazil’s 2018 election, in particular the use of Facebook’s WhatsApp messaging platform to disseminate propaganda in an election which saw neo-fascist Jair Bolsonaro take power, and he identified these techniques used as a possible sign of things to come in the global north.

(Brasil Wire first wrote about this specific threat to the integrity of country’s democratic institutions in March 2015, three years before the Cambridge Analytica scandal broke).

“Their (AfD) background is neo-nazi, their actual policies are harsh, brutal, xenophobic, anti-immigrant, anti-worker…it’s a neo-fascist party. A media company in the United States, a Texas-based company which works for Trump, for Marine Le Pen, Netanyahu, other far right figures, got together with the Berlin office of Facebook which agreed to give them detailed demographic information about the voting population in Germany, of course they have this mass of information, so that they could microtarget ads to particular individuals, playing on their prejudices and concerns in order to try and get them to vote for AfD. We don’t have a detailed study of what happened, but in fact the AfD vote went surprisingly high.

That looks like a case of authentic manipulation.

There is a much more serious one in Brazil. In Brazil, a really horrendous figure, the worst of all the authoritarian figures now plaguing the world, did succeed in getting elected. One of the means was by imprisoning the likely victor Lula da Silva – who was far ahead in the polls – imprisoning him for 25 years, essentially a death sentence; solitary confinement, not allowed to get print material, not allowed to make public statements, to try to silence him before the polls.

The next move was a massive campaign on social media, WhatsApp, which is it for most of the population, the poor population – they have phones, they don’t read newspapers, don’t have television….an incredible campaign of venomous lies and villification. It’s hard to believe when you see it, but it had an impact. People over there say that yes, people started to believe it; that the opposition, the Workers Party, was going to force children to be homosexuals, attack religion, all sorts of hideous things. And it had an effect, it was well funded, sources were probably here (United States) but we can’t be sure, and it may be a kind of dry run for what we will be seeing in future elections. Now those are things to be concerned about.“

https://www.brasilwire.com/chomsky-speaks-out-on-brasils-manipulated-2018-election/

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Bolsanaro's Approach To "...