Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
plasma-taken-from-covid-19-survivors-might-help-patients-fight-it-off/ (Original Post) efhmc Apr 2020 OP
Question about plasma donation: shanti Apr 2020 #1
Been used since the 30's efhmc Apr 2020 #3
I can find nothing which says that one is more painful than another. efhmc Apr 2020 #4
I've donated for years. No difference whatsoever. defacto7 Apr 2020 #5
The pics I saw shanti Apr 2020 #6
In some cases they return the red cells back to you in the other arm. defacto7 Apr 2020 #7
Corporate interests try to capture him to milk his plasma for profit. Marcuse Apr 2020 #2
I wonder if there's been more research. Igel Apr 2020 #8
And if they'd test us all, AirmensMom Apr 2020 #9

shanti

(21,675 posts)
1. Question about plasma donation:
Thu Apr 9, 2020, 01:00 PM
Apr 2020

Is it more complicated than a regular blood donation? I heard it was more painful.

efhmc

(14,725 posts)
3. Been used since the 30's
Thu Apr 9, 2020, 01:09 PM
Apr 2020

"Significant equipoise exists in the literature regarding the optimal plasma formulation. LP is a freeze-dried formulation that was originally developed in the 1930s and used by the American and British military in World War II. It was subsequently discontinued due to risk of disease transmission from pooled donors." I think it was used a great deal because there was not enough donated blood.

defacto7

(13,485 posts)
7. In some cases they return the red cells back to you in the other arm.
Thu Apr 9, 2020, 01:28 PM
Apr 2020

Not always though. It's not a big deal. Some people do it a couple times a week. I shouldn't have said whatsoever but it just doesn't seem any different to me in the process.

Igel

(35,293 posts)
8. I wonder if there's been more research.
Thu Apr 9, 2020, 01:45 PM
Apr 2020

The last bit I saw published with great fanfare said that they got the same results with plasma transfusions as others did without. (They didn't say that last bit, they had no control group, but the results were the same as elsewhere for those not getting the treatment.)

I.e., same as hydroxychloroquine. That's killed as a possible treatment because of its Advocate in Chief, but the plasma thing was hailed as salvation. Same results as of end of March, but it wasn't tainted.

Even this is iffy, but it can't much hurt to test. Doing it in lots of places *before* a reasonable trial, with a control, is done is dangerous. It takes staff and equipment to do and if both are in short supply then somebody's shortchanged. In someplace not slammed with a "surge", great.

AirmensMom

(14,642 posts)
9. And if they'd test us all,
Thu Apr 9, 2020, 01:48 PM
Apr 2020

they might have a bigger pool of plasma donors. Unless I missed it, I don't see where the donor has to have had it with symptoms. Those people will never be tested.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»plasma-taken-from-covid-1...