General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPrelim rslts: pts that got hydroxychlorquine did worse than pts who rec'd supportive treatment only
Mayan Gilboa @gilboa_mayan
Preliminary results that patients that got hydroxychlorquine actually did worse than patients that received supportive treatment only.
Like a bucket of cold ice
Mayan Gilboa @gilboa_mayan
This got a lot of attention
I received this earlier this morning through social media. I do not know how it was obtained.
I guess this is a study still under review and is not yet peer reviewed.
I thought it is important for other people to hear about this not because I think the conclusions are decisive, but because I think that it should be emphasized that when we give our patients meds that were not examined in good big RCT's we might be doing harm.
7:33 AM - Apr 11, 2020
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
dalton99a
(81,455 posts)Fake News by the liberal New England Journal of Medicine
Wounded Bear
(58,647 posts)so far, we have what amounts to anecdotal evidence so far. Not a lot of data from controlled tests.
Says right on it: "Preliminary"
Dream Girl
(5,111 posts)The methodology appears solid and results seems incontrovertible
Eetbble
bluedye33139
(1,474 posts)One died, and three went straight to the ICU for heroic life-saving efforts.
The French gentleman then decided to use only the 20 remaining and surviving subjects for his statistics, and by excluding the six people who had dramatic negative reactions, he fabricated his positive results.
It was an astonishing misuse of data. I'm still in shock that people read that study and concluded that the drug would confer immunity to the virus and would cure the virus in anyone it was given to. Six of them had horrifying reactions, six out of 26, and that was simply ignored.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)and that is the most important factor.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)If he has a demonstrated equity position in the company. At least employees and their companies can be held liable for their statements regarding their products or those of their competitors. Given he is also President, so presumably having access to the best available information, he has the highest burden to be truthful and not speculate.
hlthe2b
(102,226 posts)with contraindications for such usage. Old people are not mere guinea pigs for such experimentation.
Mersky
(4,980 posts)Am so tired of the republicans in the states government mucking about with their zealotry and abuse - every Texan should be ashamed of abbotts interjection into the testing of this drug in an effort to please hair furher.
Ive been meaning to find evidence of any ethics review process for what they pushed at that nursing home in Texas City. Makes me livid just questioning whether they were able to give consent or not, and whether its a medically appropriate population to test to begin with.
Gov abbott is a miserably mean-spirited man undeserving of the office he holds and wholly unqualified to direct medical experimentation under any circumstance.
He should be concerned with tests, testing, and then testing some more, obtaining PPE (Texas has companies that should already be manufacturing materials for such - like an alternative to koch industries Dacron/synthetic fiber used in the nasopharyngeal swabs), and maintaining social distancing measures until public health experts have solid numbers for when it is safe to loosen restrictions.
exboyfil
(17,862 posts)Irrespective of how the drug did or did not work.
This President's approach is closer to Idiocracy than I hoped we ever come. The fact that the public doesn't understand it, and the press doesn't seem willing to educate them is a sad commentary on our country.
RockRaven
(14,959 posts)The "evidence" which started this rabbit trail was horse-shit to begin with.
FIRST. DO. NO. HARM.
shockey80
(4,379 posts)lark
(23,093 posts)Proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that he is killing us on purpose for his own profits.
Dave in VA
(2,037 posts)stock portfolio strongly disagrees!
Cirque du So-What
(25,930 posts)Anyone who thinks with his gut has shit for brains.