Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

shockey80

(4,379 posts)
Mon Apr 13, 2020, 12:33 PM Apr 2020

All the models, predictions on the final death toll are complete bullshit.

They are now saying it may be around 60,000. 60,000 by when, what date? By June, July? This virus is not going anywhere. Even when we reach the peak and then the spreading of the virus slows down, people are still going to die from the virus. The rate may slow down, but people will continue to die.

There could be a second wave, with a lunatic in the Whitehouse the chances of that happening are very good.

If it takes 18 months to get a vaccine and then many months to manufacture billions of doses, months to give billions of people the vaccine, people will continue to die.

They give us predictions of the final death toll, but they don't give us a date when people will stop dying from the virus. If you don't know when people will stop dying from the virus , how can you predict the final death toll? Just saying.

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
All the models, predictions on the final death toll are complete bullshit. (Original Post) shockey80 Apr 2020 OP
We are dealing with a Wellstone ruled Apr 2020 #1
19 days. kentuck Apr 2020 #2
and that is assuming a straight line, not a logarithmic curve. mopinko Apr 2020 #9
That is right. kentuck Apr 2020 #10
I don't think there'll ever be an effective vaccine, there isn't even one for the regular flu ansible Apr 2020 #3
They're working on 70 Proud Liberal Dem Apr 2020 #7
The current model peggysue2 Apr 2020 #4
This message was self-deleted by its author Sherman A1 Apr 2020 #5
I've been taking that estimate to be for the first wave gristy Apr 2020 #6
Trump is focused on the present and what number will help his re-election campaign Proud Liberal Dem Apr 2020 #8
No, they aren't. Captain Stern Apr 2020 #11
they are putting a lot of stock in the body count. mopinko Apr 2020 #12
My, my, aren't we testy? Wounded Bear Apr 2020 #13
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
1. We are dealing with a
Mon Apr 13, 2020, 12:41 PM
Apr 2020

Propaganda Campaign coming directly out of the Oval. There are real facts and then there is the Orange Anus seeking reelection facts.

kentuck

(111,056 posts)
2. 19 days.
Mon Apr 13, 2020, 12:52 PM
Apr 2020

We are presently losing 2000 + lives per day. At that rate, it would take 19 more days to reach 60,000 casualties.

That would be more lives than lost in the Vietnam War, on the American side.

That would put us around May 2nd.

We must guard against letting these lives becoming numbers rather than real people with families and loved ones.



mopinko

(70,024 posts)
9. and that is assuming a straight line, not a logarithmic curve.
Mon Apr 13, 2020, 01:58 PM
Apr 2020

so, yeah, complete and dangerous bullshit.

kentuck

(111,056 posts)
10. That is right.
Mon Apr 13, 2020, 02:01 PM
Apr 2020

That would assume that it has reached a plateau and the death rate will not increase.

 

ansible

(1,718 posts)
3. I don't think there'll ever be an effective vaccine, there isn't even one for the regular flu
Mon Apr 13, 2020, 12:55 PM
Apr 2020

Consider how the regular flu already kills thousands every year, I still vividly remember the 2018 flu season and got hit with the worst flu I've ever experienced. We're fucked, it's here to stay for good.

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,396 posts)
7. They're working on 70
Mon Apr 13, 2020, 01:41 PM
Apr 2020

they have 3 leading candidates. Hopefully, they are able to at least come up with something to lessen the effects, make them less severe. I mean, the Flu vaccine usually works pretty well for most people but obviously it's not foolproof. And most of the people whom die from the Flu are elderly or compromised.

peggysue2

(10,825 posts)
4. The current model
Mon Apr 13, 2020, 01:13 PM
Apr 2020

Indicates 61,500+ deaths by August 4th. But you're quite right about the numbers changing as conditions on the ground change and Trump pushes for his early 'business as usual' opening.

It's a clusterf*ck of monumental proportions.

Medical experts I've read have been saying that we will not have an automatic end to infection rates, that the virus will stalk the population for some time to come until (or if) an effective vaccine is universally available. The numbers will slow down but they won't stop altogether. They've also indicated that we should not expect the warmer weather to be a Eureka moment.

Second wave? Yeah, it's possible. A lot we don't know.

Response to shockey80 (Original post)

Proud Liberal Dem

(24,396 posts)
8. Trump is focused on the present and what number will help his re-election campaign
Mon Apr 13, 2020, 01:46 PM
Apr 2020

never on what's best for other people. But still 60K deaths in a matter of 2-3 months ain't nothing to brag about.

Captain Stern

(2,199 posts)
11. No, they aren't.
Mon Apr 13, 2020, 02:01 PM
Apr 2020

The model that you're probably talking about predicts about 60,000 by August. Not June. Not July. August. That's a smaller number than was previously predicted, so that's good.

It's never been represented as a model that predicts the total amount of deaths. Ever.

Yes, there could be a second wave, or a third wave, or maybe a vaccine is never developed.

If you actually thought that that model (or any other model that I've seen) was predicting 60,000 as the final death toll in our country from the virus, then you were severely misinformed (at best).

mopinko

(70,024 posts)
12. they are putting a lot of stock in the body count.
Mon Apr 13, 2020, 02:03 PM
Apr 2020

i have a wager w my trumpkin. i wont say what it is exactly, except that his silly low ball arrived last week already.
we didnt stipulate a time in the original bet, but i decided to be a sport, and make it 1 year. i also said i didnt win till we split the difference.

but i did tell him many times that the body count was they only stat that mattered. now he is claiming they are tagging every body in the morgue as cv. i told him they are finding bodies now, and will keep finding them all summer.

60,000 is a number we will shake our heads at 6 mos from now.

Wounded Bear

(58,605 posts)
13. My, my, aren't we testy?
Mon Apr 13, 2020, 02:04 PM
Apr 2020

many of the early models were based on various stages of preventive measures. The worst preditions were based on unfettered spread of the virus.

Most places have put measures in place to slow the pandemic. They're working, though we aren't anywhere near where we need to get there.

Predicting natural events is difficult, especially when dealing with human behaviors. All predictions are at best estimates. Frankly, I'm glad that predicted levels of damage are dropping.

Only idiots like the Presidump are predicting some magic return to normal in June.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»All the models, predictio...