Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,891 posts)
Sat Apr 18, 2020, 07:47 AM Apr 2020

Judge: Tennessee can't prevent abortions during coronavirus

Source: Associated Press

Judge: Tennessee can’t prevent abortions during coronavirus

By TRAVIS LOLLER
April 18, 2020

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A federal judge Friday night ruled that Tennessee has to continue allowing abortions amid a temporary ban on nonessential medical procedures that’s aimed at slowing the spread of COVID-19.

U.S. District Judge Bernard Friedman said the defendants didn’t show that any appreciable amount of personal protective equipment, or PPE, would be saved if the ban is applied to abortions.

In a hearing by phone Friday, attorneys representing several state abortion clinics argued that Tennessee women will face immediate harm if the ban on abortions is not lifted.

Alex Rieger, arguing for the Tennessee attorney general’s office, said abortions are not being singled out but treated like any other procedure that is not necessary to prevent death or serious bodily injury. Gov. Bill Lee issued an emergency order on April 8 banning those procedures for three weeks.

-snip-


Read more: https://apnews.com/00673bc8506133c7a7056c055f001f48
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge: Tennessee can't prevent abortions during coronavirus (Original Post) Eugene Apr 2020 OP
Thank you Judge Bernard Friedman spanone Apr 2020 #1
Tucker Carlson is making hay out of this Shermann Apr 2020 #2

Shermann

(7,413 posts)
2. Tucker Carlson is making hay out of this
Sat Apr 18, 2020, 09:45 AM
Apr 2020

He's contrasting it with joint replacement surgery which is currently deemed non-essential.

So giving people their mobility is non-essential but killing babies is, or so the argument goes.

I think the key difference he's glossing over is how joint replacement surgery ties up hospital staff and ICU beds.

Details details.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judge: Tennessee can't pr...