Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,492 posts)
Mon Apr 20, 2020, 05:18 PM Apr 2020

Columnist systematically dismantles Dan Crenshaw's viral defense of Trump

Columnist systematically dismantles Dan Crenshaw’s viral defense of Trump

on April 20, 2020

By Matthew Chapman at Raw Story

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/04/columnist-systematically-dismantles-dan-crenshaws-viral-defense-of-trump/
.
"SNIP......

On Monday, writing for The Washington Post‘s “The Fix,” Aaron Blake broke down the false claims in the viral video President Donald Trump tweeted of Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) defending his response to the coronavirus pandemic.

“Jan. 31: Crenshaw says Trump implements China travel restrictions ‘even though things like the World Health Organization were saying ‘no need to limit trade and movement,’ and they largely criticized President Trump’s travel restrictions,'” wrote Blake. “This is an incorrect summary of the WHO’s comments on travel bans. … In the story [Crenshaw cites], the WHO’s head, Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, doesn’t say there is ‘no need’ for travel bans at all; he instead says there was no need to ‘unnecessarily interfere with international travel and trade.’ He is quoted saying, ‘We call on all countries to implement decisions that are evidence-based and consistent.’ That’s not saying there should be no bans but instead that countries should be judicious with them. Crenshaw also repeated Trump’s claim that the WHO ‘largely criticized’ Trump’s travel restrictions; STAT News has found no evidence to bolster that claim.”

“Crenshaw adds it was the ‘same day, Jan. 31, that Nancy Pelosi proposed the NO BAN Act, which would actually stop President Trump implementing the lifesaving travel restrictions that he did implement,'” continued Blake. “Pelosi didn’t propose the NO BAN Act on Jan. 31. The bill had been introduced by another member a year ago … What’s more, the NO BAN Act wouldn’t ‘stop President Trump implementing the lifesaving travel restrictions.’ In fact, while the act requires more significant and documented justification for travel bans, it affirms a president’s authority in such cases.”

“Feb. 4: ‘Let’s not forget that President Trump did talk about the coronavirus in the State of the Union on Feb. 4. What happened to that State of the Union? That happened.’ (Video plays of Pelosi ripping up her copy of the speech after Trump finished.)” wrote Blake. “Crenshaw notably doesn’t relay what Trump actually said about the virus in his State of the Union. In the speech, Trump said, ‘We are coordinating with the Chinese government and working closely together on the coronavirus outbreak in China. My administration will take all necessary steps to safeguard our citizens from this threat.’ It was among comments around that time in which Trump played up the coordination between the two countries, even as figures within his administration were privately bemoaning the lack of cooperation from China.”

“‘Fast forward a couple weeks when the president actually asked Congress for supplemental funding to combat the virus. What did Nancy Pelosi do? Instead of putting that money on the House floor to be voted on, she put a bill to ban flavored tobacco,'” wrote Blake. “As PolitiFact has noted, there were ongoing negotiations about the package until early March. The Trump administration also asked for the funding on Feb. 24, when the bill on flavored tobacco and vaping products already was on the agenda. The GOP-controlled Senate at the time was taking up antiabortion rights bills.”


......SNIP"

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Columnist systematically dismantles Dan Crenshaw's viral defense of Trump (Original Post) applegrove Apr 2020 OP
K&R UTUSN Apr 2020 #1
Saw him on Real Time. Reminds me of Bannon. nt applegrove Apr 2020 #2
He's dangerous because he's not stupid. We haven't seen the last of him, unfortunately. UTUSN Apr 2020 #3
Maher interviews right wingers and if he doesn't destroy them, and Maher is applegrove Apr 2020 #4

UTUSN

(70,645 posts)
3. He's dangerous because he's not stupid. We haven't seen the last of him, unfortunately.
Mon Apr 20, 2020, 06:27 PM
Apr 2020

I saw MAHER putting up a good fight against him, but other DUers didn't see it that way. Others don't like it that MAHER hosts wingnuts, which I see as a strength for challenging them. What I don't like about him and Libertarians in general is that they are with us 90% or so but it's that 10% that rankles.













applegrove

(118,492 posts)
4. Maher interviews right wingers and if he doesn't destroy them, and Maher is
Mon Apr 20, 2020, 06:32 PM
Apr 2020

not a propagandist so he is bound by discernable reality unlike the GOP, then they get destroyed the next week or two by democrats or the press. Shows we are in fact working together, organically perhaps, to fight that huge gish gallop that is the GOP.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Columnist systematically ...