Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWH changes transcript of Birx exchange w/ Trump re: light as a treatment
Link to tweet
Shannon Pettypiece ✔@spettypi
White House corrects transcript of Birx exchange with Trump on light to kill coronavirus virus. Changing from that is a treatment to not as a treatment


7:59 AM - Apr 24, 2020
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
WH changes transcript of Birx exchange w/ Trump re: light as a treatment (Original Post)
Dennis Donovan
Apr 2020
OP
The Magistrate
(96,043 posts)1. This Is Stalin-League Stuff, sir
There is tape....
"Defeat of a hated enemy is something to be for."
Dennis Donovan
(31,059 posts)3. There sure is, my friend
2naSalit
(100,980 posts)6. Oh lordy...
as someone once said.
dalton99a
(92,843 posts)8. +1
gordianot
(15,757 posts)2. Doesn't UV light treatment turn your skin orange?
With pronounced white areas around your eyes from protective goggles. You can always compensate by staring into a solar eclipse.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)4. It's on video . . . .
I still think of "Jim Jones" when it comes to t-rump's cult.
2naSalit
(100,980 posts)7. That's what the "J" is for, Jonestown.
onenote
(46,056 posts)5. I heard it as "not as a treatment"
I think the correction was in order in this instance.
lostnfound
(17,440 posts)9. So the scandal is that they corrected their error/attempted lie? She said "not as a treatment" nt
crickets
(26,168 posts)10. Question: does this fall under the purview of the Presidential Records Act?
Seems like it counts as destruction or falsification of an official transcript to me.
