I swear to God, NYT

[Recursion]

sometimes...

Link to tweet

[dalton99a]

1. NYT: All the Bothsiderism That's Fit to Print.

Access to power is their real motto

[uponit7771]

2. +1, there should NOT be any attempt to stay neutral with Trump by any media outlet.

[dalton99a]

5. I'd like to know the experts they consulted who said it was ok to inject bleach.

Dirty apologists and lazy editors

[Chainfire]

7. In the construction industry

we always defined "Experts" as "Assholes from out of town."

I read an article on where Trump may have gotten his idea. It seems that some cult "Expert" is selling a watered down form of bleach to his faithful as a treatment for everything from Aids to Zika Virus. That has to be the Expert that agrees with trump.

[Ferrets are Cool]

3. I remember when the NYT's was a real news source.

[NRaleighLiberal]

4. did you see Bret Stephens Op Ed? Yikes. The stupid...it burns

[dalton99a]

6. +1. Same paper that catapulted the propaganda for Iraq and the Hillary emails

[NRaleighLiberal]

8. I guess the need to sell papers means normalization - bothsideserism - more important than we are

clearly.

[lark]

9. Boo, this is why I cancelled my subscription and switched to WaPo.

Got sick of their administration fluffing BS. I loved reading the readers comments to editorials, but too many of the eds and articles were just fluffy pieces for drumpf so I quit them.

[dalton99a]

12. +1. Not a fan of Bezos, but WP is a far better newspaper and deserves it reputation.

Bezos is pretty much leaving it alone - he knows its reputational value

[stillcool]

10. isn't that what they should do?

they corrected 'some experts'...to there is no debate on the danger.

[Recursion]

13. Certainly retracting it is better than not retracting it

The editorial instinct that made them say it in the first place is what infuriates me.

[Takket]

11. at least they fixed the mistake... the first headline was absurd.