General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOff-duty cop shoots teenager in head when startled by light. Sheriffs treat cop as victim.No arrest.
https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2020/4/23/1939827/--Shouldn-t-have-been-out-Louisiana-sheriff-blames-unarmed-teen-when-cop-shoots-him-over-cell...
Its never a good call when you get a call that your child has been shot, Lopinto said. And that being said, all that can be prevented if we can keep our children home especially at that time of night.
...
Lopinto didnt stop his defense of the officer at the time of the incident either. "He was not in uniform. He was woken up with no shirt on and shorts on and exited his house as a regular homeowner, Lopinto said. We are treating him as obviously a victim and a suspect at this time."
According to the Sheriff's department, no crime was commited against the officer. So why is he being treated by the Sheriff's department as the victim of this situation? Victim of what?
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Nothing to see here. Never mind that perceiving a phone flashing as a gunshot when it was not immediately followed by the normal audible report of a gunshot is pretty much a FCUKING RIDICULOUS excuse ...
Kinda curious as to the ethnicity of the parties involved in this shooting.
writes3000
(4,734 posts)I hate shoot first stories like this.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)cops are EXACTLY the ones who should be trained to not make a mistake like this.
for the teen and his/her family. May they make a full recovery.
unblock
(52,196 posts)somehow, random kids with no training in police-encounter situations are supposed to know to instantly turn off their cell phone to avoid having their cell phone light flash, lest they get shot by police?
meanwhile, a trained police officer is completely allowed to mistake any random flash of light, presumably accompanied by *no gunshot sound*, for an actual gunshot, and "return" fire?
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)Karadeniz
(22,506 posts)Newest Reality
(12,712 posts)I see no reason that the off-duty officer was in danger in his home.
You mean, it didn't occur to him, when he suspected something going afoul to CALL THE POLICE?
Yeah, I know, that could have had a bad outcome as well, but we are talking about a suspect and NOT a victim of anything. He chose to enter the situation, was armed and had no reason or right to try to detain them in that situation since nobody was in danger until he acted.