Sun Apr 26, 2020, 08:43 PM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
Biden Accuser, Tara Reade, Allegedly Stole from Non-Profit Organization - The MediumLast edited Sun Apr 26, 2020, 10:36 PM - Edit history (1) Since Alexandra Tara Reade’s sexual assault allegations against former Vice President Joe Biden have come to light, careful examination of her account unveils more questions than answers.
Three weeks ago, we reported on the many contradictions in Reade’s account, as well as the extreme changes in her attitude toward the former vice president. She has evolved from a woman who repeatedly praised Joe Biden for work he’s done to help end sexual assault in America, in 2017, to someone who now says Biden sexually assaulted her in 1993. Now we’ve obtained new information concerning Tara Reade’s character, from a non-profit organization based in Watsonville, California, called Pregnant Mare Rescue (PMR). Lynn Hummer, Founder/President of the highly-rated horse sanctuary that’s committed to rescuing pregnant mares and orphan foals from abuse, tells us that Tara Reade (McCabe) volunteered at her rescue for a couple of years (from 2014–2016). During this time, Hummer alleges that Reade “stole from her nonprofit, lied, and created stories to obtain sympathy and money.” We’ve also obtained receipts and emails that back up many of Hummer’s claims. A very interesting read. More at: THE MEDIUM
|
84 replies, 10800 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | OP |
HarlanPepper | Apr 2020 | #1 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #2 | |
Sloumeau | Apr 2020 | #18 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #26 | |
Gothmog | Apr 2020 | #53 | |
brush | Apr 2020 | #3 | |
FloridaBlues | Apr 2020 | #4 | |
DURHAM D | Apr 2020 | #5 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #11 | |
Cha | Apr 2020 | #34 | |
Skittles | Apr 2020 | #6 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #8 | |
KWR65 | Apr 2020 | #7 | |
Skittles | Apr 2020 | #9 | |
Joinfortmill | Apr 2020 | #19 | |
Sloumeau | Apr 2020 | #21 | |
Cha | Apr 2020 | #32 | |
Demsrule86 | Apr 2020 | #51 | |
The Magistrate | Apr 2020 | #10 | |
SunSeeker | Apr 2020 | #12 | |
luvtheGWN | Apr 2020 | #13 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #15 | |
TomCADem | Apr 2020 | #16 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #24 | |
alp227 | Apr 2020 | #29 | |
TomCADem | Apr 2020 | #47 | |
JI7 | Apr 2020 | #20 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #25 | |
kairos12 | Apr 2020 | #14 | |
Joinfortmill | Apr 2020 | #17 | |
sarcasmo | Apr 2020 | #22 | |
George II | Apr 2020 | #23 | |
MustLoveBeagles | Apr 2020 | #27 | |
Gore1FL | Apr 2020 | #28 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #30 | |
Gore1FL | Apr 2020 | #35 | |
Blue_true | Apr 2020 | #31 | |
Gore1FL | Apr 2020 | #36 | |
Blue_true | Apr 2020 | #37 | |
Gore1FL | Apr 2020 | #39 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #48 | |
DURHAM D | Apr 2020 | #38 | |
Gore1FL | Apr 2020 | #40 | |
DURHAM D | Apr 2020 | #41 | |
Gore1FL | Apr 2020 | #42 | |
DURHAM D | Apr 2020 | #43 | |
Gore1FL | Apr 2020 | #45 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #49 | |
uponit7771 | Apr 2020 | #57 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #59 | |
Gore1FL | Apr 2020 | #61 | |
Demsrule86 | Apr 2020 | #52 | |
Gore1FL | Apr 2020 | #60 | |
Demsrule86 | Apr 2020 | #65 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #68 | |
OnDoutside | Apr 2020 | #69 | |
Gore1FL | Apr 2020 | #70 | |
Gore1FL | Apr 2020 | #71 | |
Demsrule86 | May 2020 | #79 | |
Gore1FL | May 2020 | #82 | |
Demsrule86 | May 2020 | #80 | |
Gore1FL | May 2020 | #81 | |
Demsrule86 | May 2020 | #83 | |
Gore1FL | May 2020 | #84 | |
smirkymonkey | May 2020 | #74 | |
Demsrule86 | May 2020 | #78 | |
The Magistrate | Apr 2020 | #64 | |
Gothmog | Apr 2020 | #54 | |
DenverJared | Apr 2020 | #33 | |
misanthrope | Apr 2020 | #44 | |
BGBD | Apr 2020 | #46 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #50 | |
crickets | Apr 2020 | #55 | |
Gothmog | Apr 2020 | #56 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #58 | |
Gothmog | Apr 2020 | #62 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #63 | |
Gothmog | Apr 2020 | #66 | |
mzmolly | Apr 2020 | #67 | |
mcar | Apr 2020 | #72 | |
meow2u3 | May 2020 | #73 | |
iwannaknow | May 2020 | #75 | |
mzmolly | May 2020 | #76 | |
dalton99a | May 2020 | #77 |
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 08:46 PM
HarlanPepper (2,042 posts)
1. She then converted it into rubles.
Response to HarlanPepper (Reply #1)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 08:48 PM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
2. LOL
Perhaps she's bilking Putin for $ as well?
|
Response to HarlanPepper (Reply #1)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:08 PM
Sloumeau (2,657 posts)
18. LOL.
When confronted, she said, "I stole for my two loves, Bernie Sanders and Vladimir Putin!".
![]() |
Response to HarlanPepper (Reply #1)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 12:42 PM
Gothmog (113,640 posts)
53. Russia and Putin are scared of Joe Biden
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 09:16 PM
brush (42,288 posts)
3. Anyone know of any sexual abuser/assaulter/rapist who stopped at one woman? Reade is lying.
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 09:22 PM
FloridaBlues (3,267 posts)
4. Her story just keeps getting more strange.
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 09:35 PM
DURHAM D (31,572 posts)
5. Interesting read.
Reade had nothing but good things to say about Biden and it appears that she only talked about working on Biden's campaign, not his senate staff.
She currently has a GoFundMe under a bogus name. Hey Tara...your shit is blowing up. |
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #5)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 12:04 AM
Cha (276,954 posts)
34. Wow.. TR has a "GoFundMe" Under a Bogus Name?
So she needs $$$$.. why isn't brie brie & Sirota holding a fundraiser for her Lies, I wonder?
I just a saw a tweet by Ed Rollins humping this story under a trump tweet that retweeted himself. It had all the TR Talking points that have been blown apart. |
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 09:46 PM
Skittles (143,996 posts)
6. while even thieves can be sexually assaulted
Ms. Reade comes across as a very troubled woman
|
Response to Skittles (Reply #6)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 09:55 PM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
8. True. One who has contradicted herself
and may need money?
|
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 09:49 PM
KWR65 (1,098 posts)
7. #metoo #believewomen n/t
Response to KWR65 (Reply #7)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 10:02 PM
Skittles (143,996 posts)
9. metoo does NOT mean just believe anyone
Response to KWR65 (Reply #7)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:09 PM
Joinfortmill (6,883 posts)
19. I'm Me Too
Her story was discredited by the NYT
|
Response to KWR65 (Reply #7)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:10 PM
Sloumeau (2,657 posts)
21. Do you think that #believewomen means "Believe women, no matter what" ? nt
Response to KWR65 (Reply #7)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:58 PM
Cha (276,954 posts)
32. The accusation has been Discredited.. you need to stop trying to smear
our Democratic nominee, Joe Biden, with this false attack.
Link to tweet Link to tweet Link to tweet The Rwing Liars are all over this shite from Reade. Tara Reade's public incident report does not mention Joe Biden by name. Examining Tara Reade’s Sexual Assault Allegation Against Joe Biden
On Thursday, Ms. Reade filed a report with the Washington, D.C., police, saying she was the victim of a sexual assault in 1993; the public incident report, provided to The Times by Ms. Reade and the police, does not mention Mr. Biden by name, but she said the complaint was about him. Ms. Reade said she filed the report to give herself an additional degree of safety from potential threats. Filing a false police report may be punishable by a fine and imprisonment. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/04/12/us/politics/joe-biden-tara-reade-sexual-assault-complaint.html ![]() |
Response to KWR65 (Reply #7)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 11:18 AM
Demsrule86 (60,347 posts)
51. Sorry as a woman who survived sexual assualt, women like Tara Reade make me sick. Women like her
cause women like me not to be believed. Women can and do lie and to deny this is ridiculous.
|
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 10:15 PM
The Magistrate (92,727 posts)
10. A Thief As Well As a Liar, Ma'am
Not a credible witness.
|
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 10:42 PM
SunSeeker (47,072 posts)
12. Not shocked. Seems par the course with her. nt
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 10:47 PM
luvtheGWN (1,308 posts)
13. In case anyone is wondering why
the organization didn't report the alleged theft, it's because the last thing a non-profit needs is bad publicity. If donors feel their donations aren't secure, then they will likely stop giving.
This woman is obviously being paid off by -- probably -- the GOP, or by a Trump-supporting superpac. She's obviously in need of $$$. |
Response to luvtheGWN (Reply #13)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:00 PM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
15. Good
points!
|
Response to luvtheGWN (Reply #13)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:02 PM
TomCADem (17,160 posts)
16. The gay guy who claimed he had sex with Obama is running for mayor of a Florida town
Tara Reade is this year's Larry Sinclair.
https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2018/11/gay-guy-claimed-sex-obama-running-mayor-florida-town/ Convicted felon Larry Sinclair is running to be the next mayor of Cocoa, Florida. Strangely enough, the gay man’s ridiculous claims that he had sex with former-President Barack Obama and the national ridicule he endured hasn’t been an issue in the race.
Sinclair is running against two Democrats in the nonpartisan race and neither of his opponents have purposefully ignored Sinclair’s criminal past or fantastical claim of “outing” the former president. “I do believe that the voters are smarter than the candidates give them credit for,” one of the opposing candidates, Cocoa City Council member Clarence Whipple Jr., told Florida Today. “But I’m not going to send stuff out on it. I’m not questioning his rehabilitation.” * * * Sinclair became infamous after he held a press conference at the National Press Club to claim he had smoked crack with Obama and had sex with him twice in 1999. Sinclair’s outrageous claims without any proof made him a national laughing stock, but spurred even more far right conspiracy theories after being picked up by outlets like Alex Jones’ InfoWars. |
Response to TomCADem (Reply #16)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:15 PM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
24. Oh good grief.
The similarities struck me as well.
I remember when Sinclair said he had a terminal brain tumor and collected $ from the gullible. ... Those were the days. 🤡 |
Response to TomCADem (Reply #16)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:45 PM
alp227 (31,387 posts)
29. When it comes to consent, there's a difference
Sinclair was peddling his fake story to exploit homophobia among Republicans.
|
Response to alp227 (Reply #29)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 02:32 AM
TomCADem (17,160 posts)
47. I Don't Think The Issue Is That Larry Sinclair Had Consenual Sex
The issue was how Larry Sinclair has made a living selling made up stories that people want to believe for political ends.
|
Response to luvtheGWN (Reply #13)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:09 PM
JI7 (86,642 posts)
20. I say it's connected to all the shit that is connected with Putin
Response to JI7 (Reply #20)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:17 PM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
25. Yes.
Fawning over Putin is another curious element to the story.
|
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 10:57 PM
kairos12 (11,295 posts)
14. Putin boot licker she is
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:06 PM
Joinfortmill (6,883 posts)
17. Never believed it. It's not Joe's way.
And the story itself was ludicrous. NYT found no veracity to her allegations.
|
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:10 PM
sarcasmo (21,996 posts)
22. Comrade Reade and her deleted Russian loving blog.
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:15 PM
George II (67,782 posts)
23. She has a highly questionable history, including ever-changing stories about the "assault".
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:27 PM
MustLoveBeagles (10,406 posts)
27. K&R
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:37 PM
Gore1FL (19,689 posts)
28. I don't believe her
This is unrelated to her claims; it's possible she is a scoundrel and telling the truth. I don't think she is telling the truth, but this isn't evidence.
|
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #28)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:46 PM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
30. It's related to her
integrity and her claims.
|
Response to mzmolly (Reply #30)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 12:25 AM
Gore1FL (19,689 posts)
35. Point.
I suspect her Biden claims can be kaboshed on their own merit, however.
|
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #28)
Sun Apr 26, 2020, 11:56 PM
Blue_true (31,259 posts)
31. The information points to her tendency to lie and make stuff up for sympathy or personal gain. nt
Response to Blue_true (Reply #31)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 12:27 AM
Gore1FL (19,689 posts)
36. I get that.
I just prefer a direct debunking. Her character certainly comes into play, but I hate that her character is a primary target, if that makes sense.
|
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #36)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 12:30 AM
Blue_true (31,259 posts)
37. In my experience, people that lie about critical issues always have had character
issues, so studying their past issues better informs how to deal with their current claims.
|
Response to Blue_true (Reply #37)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 01:15 AM
Gore1FL (19,689 posts)
39. Fair.
Personally, I would prefer to attack her claims than her character.
|
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #39)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 11:13 AM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
48. Her character is relevant to her claims,
which have been addressed in several stories by the NYT, The Nation, The Medium and others.
The writers who reported on the story above, were approached by one of her victims. |
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #28)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 12:55 AM
DURHAM D (31,572 posts)
38. Let me make it easy for you.
She is just a grifter and obviously not a skilled one. Well, maybe her fake GoFundMe account is bringing some success but probably not for much longer. I have been trying to recall how grifters used to grift before social media. I guess they just hung out in bars.
Oh, I just remembered something. My mother worked in a church office in the 60s and 70s that was open regular office hours five days a week. They had a lot of grifters stop by, particularly on Mondays because they knew the Sunday offering was being counted. It was a large church and several of the members were police and sheriff department employees. Those uniformed officers spent a lot of time just hanging out around the church and not because they needed to pray or practice the organ. Boy did they have a lot of stories abut the "stories" they heard. jftr - If anyone had legitimate needs they were addressed. It was a very generous church group. |
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #38)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 01:17 AM
Gore1FL (19,689 posts)
40. I'll make it easy for you
Attack her claims, not her.
Alleged victims are not free game. Their claims are. This is not up for debate. |
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #40)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 01:19 AM
DURHAM D (31,572 posts)
41. Her claims against Biden have already been debunked.
Why don't you tell me your take away from her grifting.
|
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #41)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 01:21 AM
Gore1FL (19,689 posts)
42. Don't attack women for making a claim. Attack the claim.
We aren't Trump; at least I didn't think we were.
|
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #42)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 01:24 AM
DURHAM D (31,572 posts)
43. I can attack men or women who
lie, particularly when it is for money.
|
Response to DURHAM D (Reply #43)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 01:28 AM
Gore1FL (19,689 posts)
45. I think all claims should be taken seriously.
It's weird that this is a controversy on a liberal site.
I refuse to attack anyone who claims to be a victim for any other reason than that the specific claim was debunked. You mileage may vary, but I think it is important to take such claims seriously. Rather than attack the claimaint, it's best to attack the claim. Forgive me for being consistent. |
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #45)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 11:16 AM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
49. The claim has been addressed. In part,
the fact that she's changed her story and those who reportedly knew her told reporters she was attention seeking and lacked credibility. This story bolsters the notion that she's not a credible individual.
|
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #45)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 07:09 PM
uponit7771 (86,033 posts)
57. Taking a claim seriously does NOT mean the accused is guilty
Response to uponit7771 (Reply #57)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 07:31 PM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
59. Exactly.
Her claim has been examined.
|
Response to uponit7771 (Reply #57)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 08:43 PM
Gore1FL (19,689 posts)
61. Whomever said it did?
I am saying we should take it seriously and not dismiss it out of hand especially because of unrelated events. We are better than that.
|
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #40)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 11:24 AM
Demsrule86 (60,347 posts)
52. Anyone can claim to be a victim. There is no reason to believe her...none.
Sorry, me too has to stop allowing women to use sexual assault or harassment as a political weapon or they will lose all credibility and such women make women less believable. Tara Reade is a habitual liar.
|
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #52)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 08:42 PM
Gore1FL (19,689 posts)
60. Take all claims seriously.
It's the same position I take with all people making such claims. It's the standard that we should all adhere to.
|
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #60)
Tue Apr 28, 2020, 02:02 PM
Demsrule86 (60,347 posts)
65. No, that cost us Franken. I will not take claims from those who have real credibility issues
seriously when they are clearly political in nature. And not only do I not take Reade seriously, I condemn her as she causes those who are telling the truth not to be believed. Republicans have weaponized Me Too and used it against Democrats. It must end. I doubt Me Too can not survive this and that is a shame.
|
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #65)
Tue Apr 28, 2020, 06:16 PM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
68. Well
said. Thank you!
|
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #65)
Tue Apr 28, 2020, 06:17 PM
OnDoutside (19,160 posts)
69. I agree.
![]() |
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #65)
Tue Apr 28, 2020, 08:04 PM
Gore1FL (19,689 posts)
70. You are confusing taking all claims seriously to over-reacting to all claims. nt
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #65)
Tue Apr 28, 2020, 08:08 PM
Gore1FL (19,689 posts)
71. Also, the right felt the same way about Kavanaugh.
Consistency is key. I am not sure what you are afraid of. I think Biden is innocent and this is made up. There is no reason to bypass the process and leave questions.
Also, Biden agrees with me: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/joe-biden-when-a-woman-alleges-sexual-assault-presume-she-is-telling-the-truth/2018/09/17/7718c532-badd-11e8-a8aa-860695e7f3fc_story.html |
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #71)
Sat May 2, 2020, 10:18 PM
Demsrule86 (60,347 posts)
79. Bullshit. Biden is running for office ...he is not being confirmed. There is no process period.
We will not allow those who want to make Sanders the nominee invent a process (Sanders has nothing to do with this) for an allegation from an obvious liar and grifter...the record is clear. No need to pretend there is even a chance she is telling the truth...
|
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #79)
Sat May 2, 2020, 10:26 PM
Gore1FL (19,689 posts)
82. This hit home so much you responded twice.
Biden agrees with me. Simmer down.
|
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #71)
Sat May 2, 2020, 10:20 PM
Demsrule86 (60,347 posts)
80. That was completely different and she never change her story and has no history of suing and
attacking people.
|
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #80)
Sat May 2, 2020, 10:24 PM
Gore1FL (19,689 posts)
81. The point is you are dismissing this inconsistently
I don't know what it is about you and short-cutting processes. Fortunately, our presumptive nominee agrees with me.
He's going to be cleared in all of this. Quit playing chicken-little with Biden. He's a grown up and can handle it. |
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #81)
Sun May 3, 2020, 12:33 AM
Demsrule86 (60,347 posts)
83. It is not inconsistent. people have looked into Reade and she is not credible. Women do lie you know
She is a politically motivated liar. You can't make it so anytime there is an accusation particularly a political one and assume it to be true with no investigation or vetting...that is madness. Since Kavanagh was being confirmed and the stature of limitation had not expired, an FBI investigation was reasonable...of course it was a bullshit investigation. Biden is running for president...not the same thing.
|
Response to Demsrule86 (Reply #83)
Sun May 3, 2020, 12:40 AM
Gore1FL (19,689 posts)
84. Exactly. Let it play out stop the pearl clutching. Stop falling for this crap.
It's divisive.
What part of "Biden agrees with me" eludes you? |
Response to smirkymonkey (Reply #74)
Sat May 2, 2020, 10:15 PM
Demsrule86 (60,347 posts)
78. Thank you.
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #40)
Tue Apr 28, 2020, 01:39 PM
The Magistrate (92,727 posts)
64. A Difference Without A Distinction, Sir
When the credibility and truth of a charge is at issue, the character of the person laying the charge must be assessed. In taking stock of a person's character, that person's whole past is relevant. A record of thieving and lying is quite proper to bring forward, and is ample reason to disregard any charge a person makes.
You are correct this is not up for debate, it is just that you are on the wrong side of the settled issue. "Defeat of a dangerous enemy is something to be for." |
Response to Gore1FL (Reply #28)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 12:48 PM
Gothmog (113,640 posts)
54. It is hard to take this claim seriously due to the changing stories
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 12:04 AM
DenverJared (457 posts)
33. Tara Reade is a fraud
and this story proves it
|
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 01:25 AM
misanthrope (6,992 posts)
44. Four years on now and some don't fully realize
how quickly the right learned to weaponize MeToo. It sucks because women should be believed when they make these claims yet these type operations only serve to undercut legitimate allegations.
|
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 02:17 AM
BGBD (3,282 posts)
46. #MeToo
has absolutely been weaponized. We've seen multiple attempts to use it against prominent men on the left, or just perceived enemies of Trump.
I think that Reade was likely fired, or just not retained from her internship with Bidens office. It was in August, so wouldn't that be about the time an internship would be ending? I think she was upset that she wasn't offered an acutal job and started back the making up stories of why it happened. Initially it was that there were "problems' in his office and she was being treated unfairly by the staff. That's what she told her mother who then called into a Larry King show that about about Senate staff issues. Then over time it morphed. When other women started saying Biden made them uncomfortable she jumped in and said that's why she was fired. Then when that didn't hurt him she dialed it up some to the current story. Her story keeps changing because she keeps changing it. Why does she have multiple twitter accounts? Why is she deleting articles from Medium? What's up with all of the information on lawsuits and legal problems that are coming up about her? Why are there multiple stories about why she moved from Washington? The only people who buy this story are the people who REALLY want it to be true. That's the Rose Twitter crowd and the far right. |
Response to BGBD (Reply #46)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 11:17 AM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
50. Exactly! I prefer that we not "Franken" another
good public servant.
Good questions! |
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 12:55 PM
crickets (21,558 posts)
55. K&R for visibility.
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 07:00 PM
Gothmog (113,640 posts)
56. Again, this story is not credible
Response to Gothmog (Reply #56)
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 07:30 PM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
58. Agree.
I tried to be fair to Reade. I read her accusations and the information she claims support her accusations. I don't find her credible.
|
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Tue Apr 28, 2020, 01:40 AM
Gothmog (113,640 posts)
62. Reade's complaint moved to inactive status
Response to Gothmog (Reply #62)
Tue Apr 28, 2020, 01:07 PM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
63. Interesting
info. Thanks!
|
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Tue Apr 28, 2020, 06:12 PM
Gothmog (113,640 posts)
66. Speaker Pelosi and Senator Klobuchar are satisfied with Joe Biden's denial
Response to Gothmog (Reply #66)
Tue Apr 28, 2020, 06:14 PM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
67. I too am satisifed
with his answer, under the circumstances.
Thanks for sharing. ![]() |
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sat May 2, 2020, 02:07 PM
meow2u3 (24,535 posts)
73. K&R for exposure of the fraud and liar
Response to mzmolly (Original post)
Sat May 2, 2020, 03:16 PM
iwannaknow (210 posts)
75. Tara Reade Inventory
Admirable Traits
- Donated 2 years of her valuable time to help out a charity she believed in - Told the truth about her ex-husband's abusive behavior - Wanted to save her horse's life - Money was clearly NOT her primary focus - Told the truth about having worked for Biden. (The notion that she would have said something about the abuse if it had happened is completely unfounded.) - Her resume seems accurate Inadmirable Traits - Was unwilling to pay the price for being so focused on ideals and not enough on financial stability - Was willing to place unauthorized charges to get her horse taken care of. This could never have worked out well - Possibly did something shady to get a prize she wanted (although we haven't heard her side of this story). - Behaved as if PMR owed her something, even though she had willingly volunteered to help them By all accounts, Tara's character is far from perfect. But is she the one who is 'on trial' here? Is she the one who is interviewing for the job of President of the United States? The focus on this article (although the author appears to have a legitimate gripe) is consistent with the character assassination a woman faces when she dares speak out about sexual assault or rape. It does not prove a thing, except perhaps that she is someone with imperfect behavior. |
Response to iwannaknow (Reply #75)
Sat May 2, 2020, 04:10 PM
mzmolly (49,969 posts)
76. Do you know her? She's not on trial. Her ever changing story is under examination.
Please add
- lied about experiences with a politician, without regard for the impact on the nation, the politician, or his family to the In-admirable traits category. And, read the story about her 'valuable time' donation as linked above. I don't care if she filed for bankruptcy, didn't have much money, was or was not assaulted by her X husband. I do care about her integrity as it relates to the ever changing story she's telling regarding Joe Biden. Link to tweet |