Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
One of the leaders of the ReOpen NC group says that she tested positive for COVID-19 (Original Post) sunonmars Apr 2020 OP
NOW she is complaining about the quantine--says it violates her civil rights!.........SELFISH SOB! riversedge Apr 2020 #1
It's a good thing we are not using 1930's quarantine rules. Delmette2.0 Apr 2020 #6
Just imagine if someone with active Tuberculosis that was ordered to isolate tulipsandroses Apr 2020 #2
She has my thoughts and prayers. nt doc03 Apr 2020 #3
Bless her heart LeftInTX Apr 2020 #4
typhoid Audrey stillcool Apr 2020 #5
Another "founder" is heavily anti-vax unc70 Apr 2020 #7

riversedge

(70,095 posts)
1. NOW she is complaining about the quantine--says it violates her civil rights!.........SELFISH SOB!
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 04:55 PM
Apr 2020



.......“As an asymptomatic COVID19 positive patient (quarantine ends 4/26),” Whitlock posted on Sunday, “another concern I have is the treatment of COVID patients as it relates to other communicable diseases. I have been forced to quarantine in my home for 2 weeks.”

Attempts to reach Whitlock for comment Sunday and Monday were unsuccessful. The News & Observer’s news partner, ABC-11, reported that Whitlock confirmed she tested positive but refused comment when asked whether she attended ReOpen NC’s protests in downtown Raleigh the last two Tuesdays.

In the information Whitlock posted on ReOpen NC’s private Facebook page, she complained that the quarantine violated her civil rights.

“I have been told not to participate in public or private accommodations as requested by the government, and therefore denied my 1st amendment right of freedom of religion,” Whitlock wrote. “If I were an essential employee, I would be denied access to my job by my employer and the government, though compensated, those with other communicable diseases are afforded the right to work. It has been insinuated by others that if I go out, I could be arrested for denying a quarantine order. However, the Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination by employers, places of public accommodation, and state and local government entities. . Where do we draw the line?”


Read more here: https://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/article242317346.html#storylink=cpy

Delmette2.0

(4,158 posts)
6. It's a good thing we are not using 1930's quarantine rules.
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 06:48 PM
Apr 2020

The local health department would be putting a large red sign on her door that says "this house is under quarantine"
My Mother told me about those signs from her childhood. People would know from a distance something bad was happening in n the family that could affect you and your family.

tulipsandroses

(5,122 posts)
2. Just imagine if someone with active Tuberculosis that was ordered to isolate
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 05:06 PM
Apr 2020

was ranting and raving about their rights being taken away.
I'm so sick of these idiots.

stillcool

(32,626 posts)
5. typhoid Audrey
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 06:08 PM
Apr 2020

although she is right about one thing...testing doesn't work, when you don't do testing. But, she got tested for anti-bodies? Is that readily available, unlike the covid-19 testing?

unc70

(6,109 posts)
7. Another "founder" is heavily anti-vax
Mon Apr 27, 2020, 07:11 PM
Apr 2020

One of the other three "founders" is a militant anti-vaxer homeschooler.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One of the leaders of the...