Supreme Court orders more arguments in case over Trump's financial records

[yortsed snacilbuper]

The Supreme Court on Monday asked the Trump administration and the House to further brief justices on whether the case over the president's financial records can be decided by the courts.

The court will hear oral arguments by phone conference on May 12.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/supreme-court-orders-more-arguments-in-case-over-trumps-financial-records/ar-BB13gA6q?ocid=spartanntp

[Thomas Hurt]

1. What the con justices couldn't find a good enough argument....

to deny the House seeing the Pig's finances?

[Hermit-The-Prog]

2. Piss on the Supine Court. While Beer-Bong Weenie Waver sits on it, it's illegitimate.

[MyOwnPeace]

3. Unfortunately,

that does not make his vote "disqualified" - it is yet another hurdle that we must get around to get justice.

[Midnight Writer]

4. There needs to be a way to fast track the Courts on these urgent issues.

It will not serve the public interest to stretch this process out until after the election.

It's a simple case that should have been resolved quickly.

[gratuitous]

5. Gotta string it out . . .

Can't be ruling against the emperor and his bogus legal argument that Congress can't carry out its constitutional duties unless Needy Amin says it's okay.