Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump adm asks intel agencies to find out whether China, WHO hid info on coronavirus pandemic
Blame anyone but don trump....
WASHINGTON The White House has ordered intelligence agencies to comb through communications intercepts, human source reporting, satellite imagery and other data to establish whether China and the World Health Organization initially hid what they knew about the emerging coronavirus pandemic, current and former U.S. officials familiar with the matter told NBC News.
A specific "tasking" seeking information about the outbreak's early days was sent last week to the National Security Agency and the Defense Intelligence Agency, which includes the National Center for Medical Intelligence, an official directly familiar with the matter said. The CIA has received similar instructions, according to current and former officials familiar with the matter.
President Donald Trump appeared to refer to the request at his news conference Monday. "We're doing very serious investigations," Trump said. "We are not happy with that whole situation, because we believe it could have been stopped at the source, it could have been stopped quickly, and it wouldn't have spread all over the world."
As part of the tasking, intelligence agencies were asked to determine what the WHO knew about two research labs studying coronaviruses in the Chinese province of Wuhan, where the virus was first observed. NBC News has previously reported that the spy agencies have been investigating the possibility that the virus escaped accidentally from one of the labs, although many experts believe that is unlikely.
A specific "tasking" seeking information about the outbreak's early days was sent last week to the National Security Agency and the Defense Intelligence Agency, which includes the National Center for Medical Intelligence, an official directly familiar with the matter said. The CIA has received similar instructions, according to current and former officials familiar with the matter.
President Donald Trump appeared to refer to the request at his news conference Monday. "We're doing very serious investigations," Trump said. "We are not happy with that whole situation, because we believe it could have been stopped at the source, it could have been stopped quickly, and it wouldn't have spread all over the world."
As part of the tasking, intelligence agencies were asked to determine what the WHO knew about two research labs studying coronaviruses in the Chinese province of Wuhan, where the virus was first observed. NBC News has previously reported that the spy agencies have been investigating the possibility that the virus escaped accidentally from one of the labs, although many experts believe that is unlikely.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/national-security/trump-administration-asks-intelligence-agencies-find-out-whether-china-who-n1194451
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
11 replies, 626 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
11 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Trump adm asks intel agencies to find out whether China, WHO hid info on coronavirus pandemic (Original Post)
spanone
Apr 2020
OP
Squinch
(50,949 posts)1. Assholes.
orwell
(7,771 posts)2. They "hid" the information...
...in the Presidential Daily Briefs that you failed to read.
There...I just saved the administration a lot of time and effort...
pwb
(11,261 posts)5. The hid it because they used words?
Trump is not good with his words yet.
kentuck
(111,089 posts)3. He's pulling the old "OJ trick" again.
He's going to find the real murderer.
Like he did with Russia.
(Nobody doubts that China hid info. But Intel told him about what was happening in the real world and he ignored it.)
spanone
(135,830 posts)7. I thought he didn't trust the intel agencies?
Trumps Politicization of U.S. Intelligence Agencies Could End in Disaster
The 1986 Chernobyl nuclear accident occurred because the work of Soviet nuclear engineerstrained to analyze complex systems based on inferences drawn from objective factswas politicized. Instead of speaking the truth as they saw it, they were intimidated by their government to conceal the true dimensions of the catastrophe unfolding before them. The result was the worst nuclear disaster in history.
Last week, U.S. Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, published an op-ed in the Washington Post outlining his growing concern about the politicization of the intelligence community. Warner wrote: Efforts by this president to intimidate U.S. intelligence services may be politically advantageous in the short term, but over time the consequences for our country will be disastrous.
We share Warners concerns.
Analytical objectivityintelligence officials writing and saying what they believe to be the truth without consideration for policy or politicsis fundamental to U.S. national security. Simply put, good policy decisions require fact-based, objective, and rigorous analysis.
Politicized intelligence, by contrast, simply reinforces preexisting beliefs, depriving leaders of a foundation for developing sound policy. That is why intelligence analysts are trained, from the very outset of their careers, in presenting objective analysis, and why the intelligence community has institutional safeguards, including ombudsmen and inspectors general, to push back against pressure that leads to bias and politicization of intelligence analysis.
Last week, U.S. Sen. Mark Warner, the top Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, published an op-ed in the Washington Post outlining his growing concern about the politicization of the intelligence community. Warner wrote: Efforts by this president to intimidate U.S. intelligence services may be politically advantageous in the short term, but over time the consequences for our country will be disastrous.
We share Warners concerns.
Analytical objectivityintelligence officials writing and saying what they believe to be the truth without consideration for policy or politicsis fundamental to U.S. national security. Simply put, good policy decisions require fact-based, objective, and rigorous analysis.
Politicized intelligence, by contrast, simply reinforces preexisting beliefs, depriving leaders of a foundation for developing sound policy. That is why intelligence analysts are trained, from the very outset of their careers, in presenting objective analysis, and why the intelligence community has institutional safeguards, including ombudsmen and inspectors general, to push back against pressure that leads to bias and politicization of intelligence analysis.
https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/04/28/trump-cia-intimidation-politicization-us-intelligence-agencies-could-end-in-disaster/
pwb
(11,261 posts)4. Trump shit on the whole world.
I wouldn't help us either if I was the world.
mucifer
(23,539 posts)6. trump kicked Obama's investigative team out of China. Obama had people monitoring for pandemics
PSPS
(13,593 posts)8. ... alomng with anything they might have on Hunter Biden too.
The Magistrate
(95,247 posts)9. With Political Cronies Installed At the Head Of these Agencies, Sir
No report emerging which aligns with the nonesense the cheap thug is spouting can be regarded as a credible assessment.
"Defeat of a dangerous enemy is something to be for."
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
(107,956 posts)11. Trump 2016 - Only I can fix it
Trump 2020 - I'm not responsible.