Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1054 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Adam Schiff was right. Part Infinity. (Original Post)
Bleacher Creature
Apr 2020
OP
What the hell does "Part Infinity" mean or have to do with any of this? Tweet does not explain it.
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2020
#2
Could be, I suppose. An infinite part implies an infinite extent. Just guessing though. . . . nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Apr 2020
#6
Botany
(70,497 posts)1. Straight up mob talk.
"If we do that we're going to have to get something for it."
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,999 posts)2. What the hell does "Part Infinity" mean or have to do with any of this? Tweet does not explain it.
A Google search references Avengers and calculus.
mr_lebowski
(33,643 posts)3. Maybe was meant to be "times infinity?" nt
NewJeffCT
(56,828 posts)4. that means he's always been right
and this is just another example of him being right again.
billh58
(6,635 posts)5. I believe that it
means a Part in a series (Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, etc.) and continuing to infinity, because Schiff is almost always correct.
Bernardo de La Paz
(48,999 posts)6. Could be, I suppose. An infinite part implies an infinite extent. Just guessing though. . . . nt